Epidemiology of time-loss injuries in English community-level rugby union

Simon P. Roberts, Grant Trewartha, Mike England, Gavin Shaddick, Keith A. Stokes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)
113 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives: Using a prospective cohort study design, to establish the incidence and nature of time-loss injuries in English community rugby and to assess the differences between different playing levels. Setting: English community rugby clubs. Participants: Injury information for 4635 matches was collected during seasons 2009/2010 (46 clubs), 2010/2011(67 clubs) and 2011/2012 (76 clubs). Clubs were subdivided into groups A (semiprofessional), B (amateur) and C (recreational) for analysis. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Any injury resulting in 8 days or greater absence frommatch play was reported by injury management staff at the clubs. The primary outcome measure was injury incidence (per 1000 player match-hours) and the secondary outcome measure was severity (ie, days absence). Results: Overall match injury incidence was 16.9 injuries per 1000 player match-hours. Incidence was higher for group A (21.7; 95% CI 19.8 to 23.6) compared with group B (16.6; 95% CI 15.2 to 17.9) and C (14.2; 95% CI 13.0 to 15.5, both p<0.001). The mean time-loss was 7.6 weeks absence, with knee and shoulder injuries the most severe with mean absences of 11.6 and 9.3 weeks, respectively. Half of all injuries occurred to the lower limb, with knee and ankle joint/ ligament injuries the most common diagnoses. Shoulder joint/ligament injuries were the most common and severe upper limb injuries. Contact events accounted for 80% of all injuries and tackles accounted for 50%. Running was the most common non-contact injury event, of which 56% were hamstring injuries. Conclusions: More time-loss injuries occur at higher levels of community rugby. Injury prevention strategies should focus on good technique in the tackle and conditioning exercises for the knee, ankle, hamstrings and shoulder.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere003998
JournalBMJ Open
Volume3
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Football
Epidemiology
Wounds and Injuries
Incidence
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Ligaments
Knee Injuries
Shoulder Joint
Ankle Joint
Knee Joint
Ankle
Upper Extremity
Running

Cite this

Epidemiology of time-loss injuries in English community-level rugby union. / Roberts, Simon P.; Trewartha, Grant; England, Mike; Shaddick, Gavin; Stokes, Keith A.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 3, No. 11, e003998, 15.11.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ec7f045d8e02484aa5dc328c2f8ad4a6,
title = "Epidemiology of time-loss injuries in English community-level rugby union",
abstract = "Objectives: Using a prospective cohort study design, to establish the incidence and nature of time-loss injuries in English community rugby and to assess the differences between different playing levels. Setting: English community rugby clubs. Participants: Injury information for 4635 matches was collected during seasons 2009/2010 (46 clubs), 2010/2011(67 clubs) and 2011/2012 (76 clubs). Clubs were subdivided into groups A (semiprofessional), B (amateur) and C (recreational) for analysis. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Any injury resulting in 8 days or greater absence frommatch play was reported by injury management staff at the clubs. The primary outcome measure was injury incidence (per 1000 player match-hours) and the secondary outcome measure was severity (ie, days absence). Results: Overall match injury incidence was 16.9 injuries per 1000 player match-hours. Incidence was higher for group A (21.7; 95{\%} CI 19.8 to 23.6) compared with group B (16.6; 95{\%} CI 15.2 to 17.9) and C (14.2; 95{\%} CI 13.0 to 15.5, both p<0.001). The mean time-loss was 7.6 weeks absence, with knee and shoulder injuries the most severe with mean absences of 11.6 and 9.3 weeks, respectively. Half of all injuries occurred to the lower limb, with knee and ankle joint/ ligament injuries the most common diagnoses. Shoulder joint/ligament injuries were the most common and severe upper limb injuries. Contact events accounted for 80{\%} of all injuries and tackles accounted for 50{\%}. Running was the most common non-contact injury event, of which 56{\%} were hamstring injuries. Conclusions: More time-loss injuries occur at higher levels of community rugby. Injury prevention strategies should focus on good technique in the tackle and conditioning exercises for the knee, ankle, hamstrings and shoulder.",
author = "Roberts, {Simon P.} and Grant Trewartha and Mike England and Gavin Shaddick and Stokes, {Keith A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003998",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epidemiology of time-loss injuries in English community-level rugby union

AU - Roberts, Simon P.

AU - Trewartha, Grant

AU - England, Mike

AU - Shaddick, Gavin

AU - Stokes, Keith A.

PY - 2013/11/15

Y1 - 2013/11/15

N2 - Objectives: Using a prospective cohort study design, to establish the incidence and nature of time-loss injuries in English community rugby and to assess the differences between different playing levels. Setting: English community rugby clubs. Participants: Injury information for 4635 matches was collected during seasons 2009/2010 (46 clubs), 2010/2011(67 clubs) and 2011/2012 (76 clubs). Clubs were subdivided into groups A (semiprofessional), B (amateur) and C (recreational) for analysis. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Any injury resulting in 8 days or greater absence frommatch play was reported by injury management staff at the clubs. The primary outcome measure was injury incidence (per 1000 player match-hours) and the secondary outcome measure was severity (ie, days absence). Results: Overall match injury incidence was 16.9 injuries per 1000 player match-hours. Incidence was higher for group A (21.7; 95% CI 19.8 to 23.6) compared with group B (16.6; 95% CI 15.2 to 17.9) and C (14.2; 95% CI 13.0 to 15.5, both p<0.001). The mean time-loss was 7.6 weeks absence, with knee and shoulder injuries the most severe with mean absences of 11.6 and 9.3 weeks, respectively. Half of all injuries occurred to the lower limb, with knee and ankle joint/ ligament injuries the most common diagnoses. Shoulder joint/ligament injuries were the most common and severe upper limb injuries. Contact events accounted for 80% of all injuries and tackles accounted for 50%. Running was the most common non-contact injury event, of which 56% were hamstring injuries. Conclusions: More time-loss injuries occur at higher levels of community rugby. Injury prevention strategies should focus on good technique in the tackle and conditioning exercises for the knee, ankle, hamstrings and shoulder.

AB - Objectives: Using a prospective cohort study design, to establish the incidence and nature of time-loss injuries in English community rugby and to assess the differences between different playing levels. Setting: English community rugby clubs. Participants: Injury information for 4635 matches was collected during seasons 2009/2010 (46 clubs), 2010/2011(67 clubs) and 2011/2012 (76 clubs). Clubs were subdivided into groups A (semiprofessional), B (amateur) and C (recreational) for analysis. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Any injury resulting in 8 days or greater absence frommatch play was reported by injury management staff at the clubs. The primary outcome measure was injury incidence (per 1000 player match-hours) and the secondary outcome measure was severity (ie, days absence). Results: Overall match injury incidence was 16.9 injuries per 1000 player match-hours. Incidence was higher for group A (21.7; 95% CI 19.8 to 23.6) compared with group B (16.6; 95% CI 15.2 to 17.9) and C (14.2; 95% CI 13.0 to 15.5, both p<0.001). The mean time-loss was 7.6 weeks absence, with knee and shoulder injuries the most severe with mean absences of 11.6 and 9.3 weeks, respectively. Half of all injuries occurred to the lower limb, with knee and ankle joint/ ligament injuries the most common diagnoses. Shoulder joint/ligament injuries were the most common and severe upper limb injuries. Contact events accounted for 80% of all injuries and tackles accounted for 50%. Running was the most common non-contact injury event, of which 56% were hamstring injuries. Conclusions: More time-loss injuries occur at higher levels of community rugby. Injury prevention strategies should focus on good technique in the tackle and conditioning exercises for the knee, ankle, hamstrings and shoulder.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890324456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003998

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003998

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003998

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 11

M1 - e003998

ER -