EPIDEMIOLOGY OF INJURIES IN ENGLISH COMMUNITY LEVEL RUGBY UNION USING SMS PLAYER SELF-REPORTED DATA

Simon Roberts, Grant Trewartha, Mike England, Matthew Attwood, Keith Stokes

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting abstract

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract Background The reporting of non-time loss injuries in community sport can be challenging due to infrequent contact between players and team medical staff. Text messaging or short messaging service (SMS) is a possible option for players to self-report these injuries. Objective Assess the incidence, site and inciting event of self-reported match injuries using SMS in men's community rugby union players. Design Using a cohort study design, consenting English community rugby players were contacted by SMS every Monday morning over a 33-week season with a follow-up on Tuesday for non-responders. Questions ascertained whether they played on the previous Saturday, whether they sustained an injury which ‘inhibited or stopped them playing’, the injured body site and if the injury event was contact or non-contact related. Setting English community rugby union during season 2015/16. Participants A total of 2990 players from 81 clubs were invited to participate. Mobile telephone numbers were provided by 1178 players (39%) from 41 clubs. The weekly mean response rate of players reporting whether or not they played was 61±2%. Independent variables Player match exposure, playing position. Main Outcome Measurements Injury incidence. Results Players reported 860 injuries over 9025 matches (71.5 injuries per 1000 player-match hours; 95% CI: 66.7–76.2). Contact events accounted for 84% of injuries. The head was the most commonly injured site (11.1; 95% CI: 9.2–12.9). Injury incidence was similar in forwards (68.7 95% CI 61.8–75.6) and backs (71.7 95% CI 64.1–79.6) but forwards reported a higher incidence of shoulder injuries than backs (9.8 95% CI: 7.2–12.4 versus 5.4 95% CI: 3.3–7.5; P=0.014) and backs reported a higher incidence of thigh injuries (3.3 95% CI: 1.8–4.8 versus 10.6 95% CI: 7.6–13.6; P<0.001). Conclusions SMS is a useful tool for recording self-reported injuries in large cohorts of community team sport players and may provide additional insight into injuries which may not result in missed matches.

Cite this

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF INJURIES IN ENGLISH COMMUNITY LEVEL RUGBY UNION USING SMS PLAYER SELF-REPORTED DATA. / Roberts, Simon; Trewartha, Grant; England, Mike; Attwood, Matthew; Stokes, Keith.

In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 51, No. 4, 01.02.2017, p. 379-379.

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting abstract

@article{a116ee97d0cb4ee08a8a65a076092f0a,
title = "EPIDEMIOLOGY OF INJURIES IN ENGLISH COMMUNITY LEVEL RUGBY UNION USING SMS PLAYER SELF-REPORTED DATA",
abstract = "Abstract Background The reporting of non-time loss injuries in community sport can be challenging due to infrequent contact between players and team medical staff. Text messaging or short messaging service (SMS) is a possible option for players to self-report these injuries. Objective Assess the incidence, site and inciting event of self-reported match injuries using SMS in men's community rugby union players. Design Using a cohort study design, consenting English community rugby players were contacted by SMS every Monday morning over a 33-week season with a follow-up on Tuesday for non-responders. Questions ascertained whether they played on the previous Saturday, whether they sustained an injury which ‘inhibited or stopped them playing’, the injured body site and if the injury event was contact or non-contact related. Setting English community rugby union during season 2015/16. Participants A total of 2990 players from 81 clubs were invited to participate. Mobile telephone numbers were provided by 1178 players (39{\%}) from 41 clubs. The weekly mean response rate of players reporting whether or not they played was 61±2{\%}. Independent variables Player match exposure, playing position. Main Outcome Measurements Injury incidence. Results Players reported 860 injuries over 9025 matches (71.5 injuries per 1000 player-match hours; 95{\%} CI: 66.7–76.2). Contact events accounted for 84{\%} of injuries. The head was the most commonly injured site (11.1; 95{\%} CI: 9.2–12.9). Injury incidence was similar in forwards (68.7 95{\%} CI 61.8–75.6) and backs (71.7 95{\%} CI 64.1–79.6) but forwards reported a higher incidence of shoulder injuries than backs (9.8 95{\%} CI: 7.2–12.4 versus 5.4 95{\%} CI: 3.3–7.5; P=0.014) and backs reported a higher incidence of thigh injuries (3.3 95{\%} CI: 1.8–4.8 versus 10.6 95{\%} CI: 7.6–13.6; P<0.001). Conclusions SMS is a useful tool for recording self-reported injuries in large cohorts of community team sport players and may provide additional insight into injuries which may not result in missed matches.",
author = "Simon Roberts and Grant Trewartha and Mike England and Matthew Attwood and Keith Stokes",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bjsports-2016-097372.242",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "379--379",
journal = "British Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0306-3674",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - EPIDEMIOLOGY OF INJURIES IN ENGLISH COMMUNITY LEVEL RUGBY UNION USING SMS PLAYER SELF-REPORTED DATA

AU - Roberts, Simon

AU - Trewartha, Grant

AU - England, Mike

AU - Attwood, Matthew

AU - Stokes, Keith

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Abstract Background The reporting of non-time loss injuries in community sport can be challenging due to infrequent contact between players and team medical staff. Text messaging or short messaging service (SMS) is a possible option for players to self-report these injuries. Objective Assess the incidence, site and inciting event of self-reported match injuries using SMS in men's community rugby union players. Design Using a cohort study design, consenting English community rugby players were contacted by SMS every Monday morning over a 33-week season with a follow-up on Tuesday for non-responders. Questions ascertained whether they played on the previous Saturday, whether they sustained an injury which ‘inhibited or stopped them playing’, the injured body site and if the injury event was contact or non-contact related. Setting English community rugby union during season 2015/16. Participants A total of 2990 players from 81 clubs were invited to participate. Mobile telephone numbers were provided by 1178 players (39%) from 41 clubs. The weekly mean response rate of players reporting whether or not they played was 61±2%. Independent variables Player match exposure, playing position. Main Outcome Measurements Injury incidence. Results Players reported 860 injuries over 9025 matches (71.5 injuries per 1000 player-match hours; 95% CI: 66.7–76.2). Contact events accounted for 84% of injuries. The head was the most commonly injured site (11.1; 95% CI: 9.2–12.9). Injury incidence was similar in forwards (68.7 95% CI 61.8–75.6) and backs (71.7 95% CI 64.1–79.6) but forwards reported a higher incidence of shoulder injuries than backs (9.8 95% CI: 7.2–12.4 versus 5.4 95% CI: 3.3–7.5; P=0.014) and backs reported a higher incidence of thigh injuries (3.3 95% CI: 1.8–4.8 versus 10.6 95% CI: 7.6–13.6; P<0.001). Conclusions SMS is a useful tool for recording self-reported injuries in large cohorts of community team sport players and may provide additional insight into injuries which may not result in missed matches.

AB - Abstract Background The reporting of non-time loss injuries in community sport can be challenging due to infrequent contact between players and team medical staff. Text messaging or short messaging service (SMS) is a possible option for players to self-report these injuries. Objective Assess the incidence, site and inciting event of self-reported match injuries using SMS in men's community rugby union players. Design Using a cohort study design, consenting English community rugby players were contacted by SMS every Monday morning over a 33-week season with a follow-up on Tuesday for non-responders. Questions ascertained whether they played on the previous Saturday, whether they sustained an injury which ‘inhibited or stopped them playing’, the injured body site and if the injury event was contact or non-contact related. Setting English community rugby union during season 2015/16. Participants A total of 2990 players from 81 clubs were invited to participate. Mobile telephone numbers were provided by 1178 players (39%) from 41 clubs. The weekly mean response rate of players reporting whether or not they played was 61±2%. Independent variables Player match exposure, playing position. Main Outcome Measurements Injury incidence. Results Players reported 860 injuries over 9025 matches (71.5 injuries per 1000 player-match hours; 95% CI: 66.7–76.2). Contact events accounted for 84% of injuries. The head was the most commonly injured site (11.1; 95% CI: 9.2–12.9). Injury incidence was similar in forwards (68.7 95% CI 61.8–75.6) and backs (71.7 95% CI 64.1–79.6) but forwards reported a higher incidence of shoulder injuries than backs (9.8 95% CI: 7.2–12.4 versus 5.4 95% CI: 3.3–7.5; P=0.014) and backs reported a higher incidence of thigh injuries (3.3 95% CI: 1.8–4.8 versus 10.6 95% CI: 7.6–13.6; P<0.001). Conclusions SMS is a useful tool for recording self-reported injuries in large cohorts of community team sport players and may provide additional insight into injuries which may not result in missed matches.

U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097372.242

DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097372.242

M3 - Meeting abstract

VL - 51

SP - 379

EP - 379

JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine

T2 - British Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0306-3674

IS - 4

ER -