Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Environmental crime and punishment: Empirical evidence from the German penal code

  • Christian Almer
  • , Timo Goeschl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

87   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

U.S. and E.U. environmental policy employ criminal sanctions to enforce compliance. Recent moves toward revising their use are based on little empirical evidence as to their effectiveness. This paper exploits a unique dataset to study the deterrent effect of criminal enforcement. The dynamic panel data analysis leads to three findings. First, criminal sanctions do provide the intended deterrent effects. Second, standing trial provides one of the most significant deterrents, rather than the probability of conviction or the magnitude of fines. Third, public preferences regarding environmental quality and political economy variables affect reported environmental crime.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)707-726
JournalLand Economics
Volume86
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2010

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental crime and punishment: Empirical evidence from the German penal code'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this