Environmental and nutrition impact of achieving new School Food Plan recommendations in the primary school meals sector in England

Kremlin Wickramasinghe, Mike Rayner, Michael Goldacre, Nick Townsend, Peter Scarborough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this modelling study was to estimate the expected changes in the nutritional quality and greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) of primary school meals due to the adoption of new mandatory food-based standards for school meals.

SETTING: Nationally representative random sample of 136 primary schools in England was selected for the Primary School Food Survey (PSFS) with 50% response rate.

PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 6690 primary students from PSFS who consumed school meals.

OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary School Food Plan (SFP) nutritional impact was assessed using both macronutrient and micronutrient quality. The environmental impact was measured by GHGEs.

METHODS: The scenario tested was one in which every meal served in schools met more than half of the food-based standards mentioned in the SFP (SFP scenario). We used findings from a systematic review to assign GHGE values for each food item in the data set. The GHGE value and nutritional quality of SFP scenario meals was compared with the average primary school meal in the total PSFS data set (pre-SFP scenario). Prior to introduction of the SFP (pre-SFP scenario), the primary school meals had mandatory nutrient-based guidelines.

RESULTS: The percentage of meals that met the protein standard increased in the SFP scenario and the proportion of meals that met the standards for important micronutrients (eg, iron, calcium, vitamin A and C) also increased. However, the SFP scenario did not improve the salt, saturated fat and free sugar levels. The mean GHGE value of meals which met the SFP standards was 0.79 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.81) kgCO2e compared with a mean value of 0.72 (0.71 to 0.74) kgCO2e for all meals. Adopting the SFP would increase the total emissions associated with primary school meals by 22 000 000 kgCO2e per year.

CONCLUSIONS: The universal adoption of the new food-based standards, without reformulation would result in an increase in the GHGEs of school meals and improve some aspects of the nutritional quality, but it would not improve the average salt, sugar and saturated fat content levels.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere013840
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ Open
Volume7
Issue number4
Early online date5 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

England
Meals
Food
Gases
Nutritive Value
Micronutrients
Salts
Fats

Keywords

  • Dietary Fats
  • Dietary Proteins
  • Dietary Sugars
  • England
  • Environment
  • Fatty Acids
  • Food Quality
  • Greenhouse Gases
  • Humans
  • Nutrition Policy
  • Schools
  • Sodium Chloride, Dietary

Cite this

Environmental and nutrition impact of achieving new School Food Plan recommendations in the primary school meals sector in England. / Wickramasinghe, Kremlin; Rayner, Mike; Goldacre, Michael; Townsend, Nick; Scarborough, Peter.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 7, No. 4, e013840, 05.04.2017, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wickramasinghe, Kremlin ; Rayner, Mike ; Goldacre, Michael ; Townsend, Nick ; Scarborough, Peter. / Environmental and nutrition impact of achieving new School Food Plan recommendations in the primary school meals sector in England. In: BMJ Open. 2017 ; Vol. 7, No. 4. pp. 1-7.
@article{c099974a9f4d456eb868d7b7588085c9,
title = "Environmental and nutrition impact of achieving new School Food Plan recommendations in the primary school meals sector in England",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The aim of this modelling study was to estimate the expected changes in the nutritional quality and greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) of primary school meals due to the adoption of new mandatory food-based standards for school meals.SETTING: Nationally representative random sample of 136 primary schools in England was selected for the Primary School Food Survey (PSFS) with 50{\%} response rate.PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 6690 primary students from PSFS who consumed school meals.OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary School Food Plan (SFP) nutritional impact was assessed using both macronutrient and micronutrient quality. The environmental impact was measured by GHGEs.METHODS: The scenario tested was one in which every meal served in schools met more than half of the food-based standards mentioned in the SFP (SFP scenario). We used findings from a systematic review to assign GHGE values for each food item in the data set. The GHGE value and nutritional quality of SFP scenario meals was compared with the average primary school meal in the total PSFS data set (pre-SFP scenario). Prior to introduction of the SFP (pre-SFP scenario), the primary school meals had mandatory nutrient-based guidelines.RESULTS: The percentage of meals that met the protein standard increased in the SFP scenario and the proportion of meals that met the standards for important micronutrients (eg, iron, calcium, vitamin A and C) also increased. However, the SFP scenario did not improve the salt, saturated fat and free sugar levels. The mean GHGE value of meals which met the SFP standards was 0.79 (95{\%} CI 0.77 to 0.81) kgCO2e compared with a mean value of 0.72 (0.71 to 0.74) kgCO2e for all meals. Adopting the SFP would increase the total emissions associated with primary school meals by 22 000 000 kgCO2e per year.CONCLUSIONS: The universal adoption of the new food-based standards, without reformulation would result in an increase in the GHGEs of school meals and improve some aspects of the nutritional quality, but it would not improve the average salt, sugar and saturated fat content levels.",
keywords = "Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Dietary Sugars, England, Environment, Fatty Acids, Food Quality, Greenhouse Gases, Humans, Nutrition Policy, Schools, Sodium Chloride, Dietary",
author = "Kremlin Wickramasinghe and Mike Rayner and Michael Goldacre and Nick Townsend and Peter Scarborough",
note = "Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013840",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental and nutrition impact of achieving new School Food Plan recommendations in the primary school meals sector in England

AU - Wickramasinghe, Kremlin

AU - Rayner, Mike

AU - Goldacre, Michael

AU - Townsend, Nick

AU - Scarborough, Peter

N1 - Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

PY - 2017/4/5

Y1 - 2017/4/5

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The aim of this modelling study was to estimate the expected changes in the nutritional quality and greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) of primary school meals due to the adoption of new mandatory food-based standards for school meals.SETTING: Nationally representative random sample of 136 primary schools in England was selected for the Primary School Food Survey (PSFS) with 50% response rate.PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 6690 primary students from PSFS who consumed school meals.OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary School Food Plan (SFP) nutritional impact was assessed using both macronutrient and micronutrient quality. The environmental impact was measured by GHGEs.METHODS: The scenario tested was one in which every meal served in schools met more than half of the food-based standards mentioned in the SFP (SFP scenario). We used findings from a systematic review to assign GHGE values for each food item in the data set. The GHGE value and nutritional quality of SFP scenario meals was compared with the average primary school meal in the total PSFS data set (pre-SFP scenario). Prior to introduction of the SFP (pre-SFP scenario), the primary school meals had mandatory nutrient-based guidelines.RESULTS: The percentage of meals that met the protein standard increased in the SFP scenario and the proportion of meals that met the standards for important micronutrients (eg, iron, calcium, vitamin A and C) also increased. However, the SFP scenario did not improve the salt, saturated fat and free sugar levels. The mean GHGE value of meals which met the SFP standards was 0.79 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.81) kgCO2e compared with a mean value of 0.72 (0.71 to 0.74) kgCO2e for all meals. Adopting the SFP would increase the total emissions associated with primary school meals by 22 000 000 kgCO2e per year.CONCLUSIONS: The universal adoption of the new food-based standards, without reformulation would result in an increase in the GHGEs of school meals and improve some aspects of the nutritional quality, but it would not improve the average salt, sugar and saturated fat content levels.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The aim of this modelling study was to estimate the expected changes in the nutritional quality and greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) of primary school meals due to the adoption of new mandatory food-based standards for school meals.SETTING: Nationally representative random sample of 136 primary schools in England was selected for the Primary School Food Survey (PSFS) with 50% response rate.PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 6690 primary students from PSFS who consumed school meals.OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary School Food Plan (SFP) nutritional impact was assessed using both macronutrient and micronutrient quality. The environmental impact was measured by GHGEs.METHODS: The scenario tested was one in which every meal served in schools met more than half of the food-based standards mentioned in the SFP (SFP scenario). We used findings from a systematic review to assign GHGE values for each food item in the data set. The GHGE value and nutritional quality of SFP scenario meals was compared with the average primary school meal in the total PSFS data set (pre-SFP scenario). Prior to introduction of the SFP (pre-SFP scenario), the primary school meals had mandatory nutrient-based guidelines.RESULTS: The percentage of meals that met the protein standard increased in the SFP scenario and the proportion of meals that met the standards for important micronutrients (eg, iron, calcium, vitamin A and C) also increased. However, the SFP scenario did not improve the salt, saturated fat and free sugar levels. The mean GHGE value of meals which met the SFP standards was 0.79 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.81) kgCO2e compared with a mean value of 0.72 (0.71 to 0.74) kgCO2e for all meals. Adopting the SFP would increase the total emissions associated with primary school meals by 22 000 000 kgCO2e per year.CONCLUSIONS: The universal adoption of the new food-based standards, without reformulation would result in an increase in the GHGEs of school meals and improve some aspects of the nutritional quality, but it would not improve the average salt, sugar and saturated fat content levels.

KW - Dietary Fats

KW - Dietary Proteins

KW - Dietary Sugars

KW - England

KW - Environment

KW - Fatty Acids

KW - Food Quality

KW - Greenhouse Gases

KW - Humans

KW - Nutrition Policy

KW - Schools

KW - Sodium Chloride, Dietary

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013840

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013840

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 4

M1 - e013840

ER -