Abstract
Low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening (LCS) in high-risk patients has shown potential in reducing lung cancer mortality. In 2019, the UK National Health Service announced rollout of the Targeted Lung Health Check programme (TLHC) following a successful pilot offering individuals between 55 and 74 years of age who have ever smoked an appointment with a health professional, which may lead to a LDCT referral depending on their risk of developing lung cancer from modelling. In view of expansion of LCS with LDCT, it is paramount that radiologists who participant in screening are adequately qualified and properly trained. To ensure the radiology reporting for an expanding programme remains clinically and cost effective, reporters must engage with nationally-set quality assurance policies. This review article aims to summarise the current individual performance against set thresholds for referral rates for actionable lung nodules and incidental findings, the current process for national external quality assurance and provides suggestions for how these facets can be merged with near-real time double-read quality assurance. We summarise processes to identify reporting outliers and provide targeted feedback to improve reporter-level performance to ensure robustness of a national lung screening programme.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | tqag158 |
| Number of pages | 41 |
| Journal | British Journal of Radiology |
| Early online date | 29 Jun 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 29 Jun 2026 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Funding
No funding was obtained for this review.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ensuring radiology reporting quality across a national lung cancer screening programme'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS