Engineering aspects of FlowNMR spectroscopy setups for online analysis of solution-phase processes

Asad Saib; Alejandro Bara-Estaún; Owen J. Harper; Daniel B.G. Berry; Isabel A. Thomlinson; Rachael Broomfield-Tagg; John P. Lowe; Catherine L. Lyall; Ulrich Hintermair

doi:10.1039/d1re00217a

Engineering aspects of FlowNMR spectroscopy setups for online analysis of solution-phase processes

Asad Saib, Alejandro Bara-Estaún, Owen J. Harper, Daniel B.G. Berry, Isabel A. Thomlinson, Rachael Broomfield-Tagg, John P. Lowe, Catherine L. Lyall, Ulrich Hintermair

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

19 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Online analysis and monitoring of solution phase chemistry by way of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy on a recirculating sample from an external reaction vessel (FlowNMR) has proven to be a valuable tool for understanding the dynamic behaviour of complex solution-phase systems in real time. A variety of flow cells and setups have been used at both low and high magnetic field strengths for various applications, and the choice of materials, dimensions and components can have a profound impact on the quality and relevance of the data obtained. Here we review some fundamental engineering aspects of FlowNMR setups to help avoid common pitfalls and work towards establishing good practice quality guidelines (GxP) for FlowNMR investigations in academia and industry. This journal is

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1548-1573
Number of pages	26
Journal	Reaction Chemistry and Engineering
Volume	6
Issue number	9
Early online date	2 Aug 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1039/d1re00217a
Publication status	Published - 24 Aug 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Royal Society (Fellowship UF160458), the EPSRC (Dynamic Reaction Monitoring Facility EP/P001475/1, Centre for Doctoral Training in Catalysis EP/ L016443, Centre for Doctoral Training in Sustainable Chemical Technologies EP/L016354/1) and the University of Bath. We thank all of our industrial partners for their support (AstraZeneca, Bruker, CatSci, DSM, Johnson-Matthey, S-PACT and Syngenta) and particularly acknowledge the help of Anna Codina, Ian Clegg, Matteo Pennestri and Martin Hofmann (Bruker), Ted King (TgK Scientific) and Carsten Damerau (HNP Mikrosysteme). We also thank Pawel Plucinski and Jonathan Barnard for helpful discussions regarding heat transfer, and Vsevolod Zozin for assistance with data fitting and modelling. Our international colleagues David Foley (Pfizer, USA) and Michael Maiwald (BAM, Berlin) are acknowledged for many stimulating discussions and sharing of their FlowNMR experience.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Catalysis
Chemistry (miscellaneous)
Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous)
Process Chemistry and Technology
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes

Access to Document

10.1039/d1re00217aLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{f89cbb5e53d1430a938787a8c9283bcf,

title = "Engineering aspects of FlowNMR spectroscopy setups for online analysis of solution-phase processes",

abstract = "Online analysis and monitoring of solution phase chemistry by way of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy on a recirculating sample from an external reaction vessel (FlowNMR) has proven to be a valuable tool for understanding the dynamic behaviour of complex solution-phase systems in real time. A variety of flow cells and setups have been used at both low and high magnetic field strengths for various applications, and the choice of materials, dimensions and components can have a profound impact on the quality and relevance of the data obtained. Here we review some fundamental engineering aspects of FlowNMR setups to help avoid common pitfalls and work towards establishing good practice quality guidelines (GxP) for FlowNMR investigations in academia and industry. This journal is ",

author = "Asad Saib and Alejandro Bara-Esta{\'u}n and Harper, {Owen J.} and Berry, {Daniel B.G.} and Thomlinson, {Isabel A.} and Rachael Broomfield-Tagg and Lowe, {John P.} and Lyall, {Catherine L.} and Ulrich Hintermair",

note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by the Royal Society (Fellowship UF160458), the EPSRC (Dynamic Reaction Monitoring Facility EP/P001475/1, Centre for Doctoral Training in Catalysis EP/ L016443, Centre for Doctoral Training in Sustainable Chemical Technologies EP/L016354/1) and the University of Bath. We thank all of our industrial partners for their support (AstraZeneca, Bruker, CatSci, DSM, Johnson-Matthey, S-PACT and Syngenta) and particularly acknowledge the help of Anna Codina, Ian Clegg, Matteo Pennestri and Martin Hofmann (Bruker), Ted King (TgK Scientific) and Carsten Damerau (HNP Mikrosysteme). We also thank Pawel Plucinski and Jonathan Barnard for helpful discussions regarding heat transfer, and Vsevolod Zozin for assistance with data fitting and modelling. Our international colleagues David Foley (Pfizer, USA) and Michael Maiwald (BAM, Berlin) are acknowledged for many stimulating discussions and sharing of their FlowNMR experience. ",

year = "2021",

month = aug,

day = "24",

doi = "10.1039/d1re00217a",

language = "English",

volume = "6",

pages = "1548--1573",

journal = "Reaction Chemistry and Engineering",

issn = "2058-9883",

publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Engineering aspects of FlowNMR spectroscopy setups for online analysis of solution-phase processes

AU - Saib, Asad

AU - Bara-Estaún, Alejandro

AU - Harper, Owen J.

AU - Berry, Daniel B.G.

AU - Thomlinson, Isabel A.

AU - Broomfield-Tagg, Rachael

AU - Lowe, John P.

AU - Lyall, Catherine L.

AU - Hintermair, Ulrich

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the Royal Society (Fellowship UF160458), the EPSRC (Dynamic Reaction Monitoring Facility EP/P001475/1, Centre for Doctoral Training in Catalysis EP/ L016443, Centre for Doctoral Training in Sustainable Chemical Technologies EP/L016354/1) and the University of Bath. We thank all of our industrial partners for their support (AstraZeneca, Bruker, CatSci, DSM, Johnson-Matthey, S-PACT and Syngenta) and particularly acknowledge the help of Anna Codina, Ian Clegg, Matteo Pennestri and Martin Hofmann (Bruker), Ted King (TgK Scientific) and Carsten Damerau (HNP Mikrosysteme). We also thank Pawel Plucinski and Jonathan Barnard for helpful discussions regarding heat transfer, and Vsevolod Zozin for assistance with data fitting and modelling. Our international colleagues David Foley (Pfizer, USA) and Michael Maiwald (BAM, Berlin) are acknowledged for many stimulating discussions and sharing of their FlowNMR experience.

PY - 2021/8/24

Y1 - 2021/8/24

N2 - Online analysis and monitoring of solution phase chemistry by way of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy on a recirculating sample from an external reaction vessel (FlowNMR) has proven to be a valuable tool for understanding the dynamic behaviour of complex solution-phase systems in real time. A variety of flow cells and setups have been used at both low and high magnetic field strengths for various applications, and the choice of materials, dimensions and components can have a profound impact on the quality and relevance of the data obtained. Here we review some fundamental engineering aspects of FlowNMR setups to help avoid common pitfalls and work towards establishing good practice quality guidelines (GxP) for FlowNMR investigations in academia and industry. This journal is

AB - Online analysis and monitoring of solution phase chemistry by way of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy on a recirculating sample from an external reaction vessel (FlowNMR) has proven to be a valuable tool for understanding the dynamic behaviour of complex solution-phase systems in real time. A variety of flow cells and setups have been used at both low and high magnetic field strengths for various applications, and the choice of materials, dimensions and components can have a profound impact on the quality and relevance of the data obtained. Here we review some fundamental engineering aspects of FlowNMR setups to help avoid common pitfalls and work towards establishing good practice quality guidelines (GxP) for FlowNMR investigations in academia and industry. This journal is

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114014542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1039/d1re00217a

DO - 10.1039/d1re00217a

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85114014542

SN - 2058-9883

VL - 6

SP - 1548

EP - 1573

JO - Reaction Chemistry and Engineering

JF - Reaction Chemistry and Engineering

IS - 9

ER -

Engineering aspects of FlowNMR spectroscopy setups for online analysis of solution-phase processes

Abstract

Bibliographical note

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

An Integrated, Multi-Dimensional In-Operando Reaction Monitoring Facility for Homogenous Catalysis Research

Heat Transfer Calculations for "Engineering aspects of FlowNMR spectroscopy setups for online analysis of solution-phase processes"

Cite this

Engineering aspects of FlowNMR spectroscopy setups for online analysis of solution-phase processes

Abstract

Bibliographical note

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Projects

An Integrated, Multi-Dimensional In-Operando Reaction Monitoring Facility for Homogenous Catalysis Research

Datasets

Heat Transfer Calculations for "Engineering aspects of FlowNMR spectroscopy setups for online analysis of solution-phase processes"

Cite this