Abstract

One aim of zero carbon, or zero energy, buildings is to help slow climate change. However, regulatory definitions frequently miss substantial emissions, for example ones associated with the materials the building is constructed from, thereby compromising this goal. Unfortunately, including such emissions might restrict the design space, reduce architectural freedom or greatly increase costs. This work presents a new framework for examining the problem. The zero carbon/energy design and regulatory space forms a sub-space of the hyper-volume enclosing all possible designs and regulatory frameworks. A new mathematical/software environment was developed which allows the size and shape of this sub-space to be investigated for the first time. Twenty-four million building design/regulatory standard combinations were modelled and assessed using a tree classification approach. It was found that a worldwide zero standard that includes embodied emissions is possible and is easier to achieve if a carbon rather than an energy metric is adopted, with the design space twice the size for a carbon metric. This result is important for the development of more encompassing regulations, and the novel methods developed applicable to other aspects of construction controlled by regulation where there is the desire to examine the impact of new regulations prior to legislation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-339
Number of pages21
JournalBuilding Services Engineering Research & Technology
Volume40
Issue number3
Early online date27 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Cite this

Energy or carbon? Exploring the relative size of universal zero carbon and zero energy design spaces. / Parkin, Anna; Herrera, Manuel; Coley, David.

In: Building Services Engineering Research & Technology, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.05.2019, p. 319-339.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{75c97dfb89ca4a9fa6a4a2c83807ed2d,
title = "Energy or carbon? Exploring the relative size of universal zero carbon and zero energy design spaces",
abstract = "One aim of zero carbon, or zero energy, buildings is to help slow climate change. However, regulatory definitions frequently miss substantial emissions, for example ones associated with the materials the building is constructed from, thereby compromising this goal. Unfortunately, including such emissions might restrict the design space, reduce architectural freedom or greatly increase costs. This work presents a new framework for examining the problem. The zero carbon/energy design and regulatory space forms a sub-space of the hyper-volume enclosing all possible designs and regulatory frameworks. A new mathematical/software environment was developed which allows the size and shape of this sub-space to be investigated for the first time. Twenty-four million building design/regulatory standard combinations were modelled and assessed using a tree classification approach. It was found that a worldwide zero standard that includes embodied emissions is possible and is easier to achieve if a carbon rather than an energy metric is adopted, with the design space twice the size for a carbon metric. This result is important for the development of more encompassing regulations, and the novel methods developed applicable to other aspects of construction controlled by regulation where there is the desire to examine the impact of new regulations prior to legislation.",
author = "Anna Parkin and Manuel Herrera and David Coley",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0143624418815780",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "319--339",
journal = "Building Services Engineering Research and Technology",
issn = "0143-6244",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy or carbon? Exploring the relative size of universal zero carbon and zero energy design spaces

AU - Parkin, Anna

AU - Herrera, Manuel

AU - Coley, David

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - One aim of zero carbon, or zero energy, buildings is to help slow climate change. However, regulatory definitions frequently miss substantial emissions, for example ones associated with the materials the building is constructed from, thereby compromising this goal. Unfortunately, including such emissions might restrict the design space, reduce architectural freedom or greatly increase costs. This work presents a new framework for examining the problem. The zero carbon/energy design and regulatory space forms a sub-space of the hyper-volume enclosing all possible designs and regulatory frameworks. A new mathematical/software environment was developed which allows the size and shape of this sub-space to be investigated for the first time. Twenty-four million building design/regulatory standard combinations were modelled and assessed using a tree classification approach. It was found that a worldwide zero standard that includes embodied emissions is possible and is easier to achieve if a carbon rather than an energy metric is adopted, with the design space twice the size for a carbon metric. This result is important for the development of more encompassing regulations, and the novel methods developed applicable to other aspects of construction controlled by regulation where there is the desire to examine the impact of new regulations prior to legislation.

AB - One aim of zero carbon, or zero energy, buildings is to help slow climate change. However, regulatory definitions frequently miss substantial emissions, for example ones associated with the materials the building is constructed from, thereby compromising this goal. Unfortunately, including such emissions might restrict the design space, reduce architectural freedom or greatly increase costs. This work presents a new framework for examining the problem. The zero carbon/energy design and regulatory space forms a sub-space of the hyper-volume enclosing all possible designs and regulatory frameworks. A new mathematical/software environment was developed which allows the size and shape of this sub-space to be investigated for the first time. Twenty-four million building design/regulatory standard combinations were modelled and assessed using a tree classification approach. It was found that a worldwide zero standard that includes embodied emissions is possible and is easier to achieve if a carbon rather than an energy metric is adopted, with the design space twice the size for a carbon metric. This result is important for the development of more encompassing regulations, and the novel methods developed applicable to other aspects of construction controlled by regulation where there is the desire to examine the impact of new regulations prior to legislation.

U2 - 10.1177/0143624418815780

DO - 10.1177/0143624418815780

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 319

EP - 339

JO - Building Services Engineering Research and Technology

JF - Building Services Engineering Research and Technology

SN - 0143-6244

IS - 3

ER -