Encouraging undergraduates’ academic writing development in e-learning contexts that students access independently or in subject-based groups

Trevor Day, Linda Humphreys, Bridgette Duncombe

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

E-learning approaches employed in a variety of contexts, from instructional to collaborative and contested, currently support academic writing development (e.g. Goodfellow, 2005; Peretz, 2005; Brown et al., 2008). This paper is an early report on progress in developing a suite of six instructional e-learning modules on aspects of critical reading and writing at a research-intensive, science- and engineering-strong university. At this university, non-remedial academic writing development is supported by subject teaching staff, Royal Literary Fund Fellows, the English Language Centre and through information skills courses run by the Library. The current project seeks to complement the existing provision by providing undergraduates with guidance through e-learning modules that engage the students in learning tasks that can be completed independently or under the guidance of teaching staff in subject disciplines (shifting between more instructional to more cognitive-constructivist and social-constructivist approaches; Mayes and de Freitas, 2004). Strengths of the e-learning project include collaboration between staff from widely different backgrounds, including a professional writer and academic writing facilitator, a faculty librarian, and a teaching fellow. In addition, detailed feedback on each module’s learning efficacy and ease-of-use is being gathered systematically from students both during the module’s development and after its launch. In designing the e-modules, the researchers and developers have been driven by pedagogical imperatives (Mayes and de Freitas, 2004; Beetham and Sharpe, 2007; Biggs and Tang, 2007; Race, 2007) rather than wishing to be led or overly constrained by perceived limitations of online technologies. Among the challenges have been how to design online activities that facilitate deep learning (Marton and Säljö, 1976; Biggs, 1987) and how to create experiences that are relevant to students from a variety of disciplines. The paper will consider the extent to which such aspirations have been met.

Conference

ConferenceWriting Development in Higher Education (WDHE) Conference 2010
CityLondon
Period28/06/1030/06/10

Fingerprint

electronic learning
learning
Group
student
university
English language
librarian
writer
engineering
staff
Teaching
science
experience

Keywords

  • instructional
  • surface learning
  • strategic learning
  • deep learning
  • e-learning
  • online

Cite this

Day, T., Humphreys, L., & Duncombe, B. (2010). Encouraging undergraduates’ academic writing development in e-learning contexts that students access independently or in subject-based groups. Paper presented at Writing Development in Higher Education (WDHE) Conference 2010, London, .

Encouraging undergraduates’ academic writing development in e-learning contexts that students access independently or in subject-based groups. / Day, Trevor; Humphreys, Linda; Duncombe, Bridgette.

2010. Paper presented at Writing Development in Higher Education (WDHE) Conference 2010, London, .

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Day, T, Humphreys, L & Duncombe, B 2010, 'Encouraging undergraduates’ academic writing development in e-learning contexts that students access independently or in subject-based groups' Paper presented at Writing Development in Higher Education (WDHE) Conference 2010, London, 28/06/10 - 30/06/10, .
Day T, Humphreys L, Duncombe B. Encouraging undergraduates’ academic writing development in e-learning contexts that students access independently or in subject-based groups. 2010. Paper presented at Writing Development in Higher Education (WDHE) Conference 2010, London, .
Day, Trevor ; Humphreys, Linda ; Duncombe, Bridgette. / Encouraging undergraduates’ academic writing development in e-learning contexts that students access independently or in subject-based groups. Paper presented at Writing Development in Higher Education (WDHE) Conference 2010, London, .
@conference{98d44fb65c854a8b907f6d53619a9635,
title = "Encouraging undergraduates’ academic writing development in e-learning contexts that students access independently or in subject-based groups",
abstract = "E-learning approaches employed in a variety of contexts, from instructional to collaborative and contested, currently support academic writing development (e.g. Goodfellow, 2005; Peretz, 2005; Brown et al., 2008). This paper is an early report on progress in developing a suite of six instructional e-learning modules on aspects of critical reading and writing at a research-intensive, science- and engineering-strong university. At this university, non-remedial academic writing development is supported by subject teaching staff, Royal Literary Fund Fellows, the English Language Centre and through information skills courses run by the Library. The current project seeks to complement the existing provision by providing undergraduates with guidance through e-learning modules that engage the students in learning tasks that can be completed independently or under the guidance of teaching staff in subject disciplines (shifting between more instructional to more cognitive-constructivist and social-constructivist approaches; Mayes and de Freitas, 2004). Strengths of the e-learning project include collaboration between staff from widely different backgrounds, including a professional writer and academic writing facilitator, a faculty librarian, and a teaching fellow. In addition, detailed feedback on each module’s learning efficacy and ease-of-use is being gathered systematically from students both during the module’s development and after its launch. In designing the e-modules, the researchers and developers have been driven by pedagogical imperatives (Mayes and de Freitas, 2004; Beetham and Sharpe, 2007; Biggs and Tang, 2007; Race, 2007) rather than wishing to be led or overly constrained by perceived limitations of online technologies. Among the challenges have been how to design online activities that facilitate deep learning (Marton and S{\"a}lj{\"o}, 1976; Biggs, 1987) and how to create experiences that are relevant to students from a variety of disciplines. The paper will consider the extent to which such aspirations have been met.",
keywords = "instructional, surface learning, strategic learning, deep learning, e-learning, online",
author = "Trevor Day and Linda Humphreys and Bridgette Duncombe",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "29",
language = "English",
note = "Writing Development in Higher Education (WDHE) Conference 2010 ; Conference date: 28-06-2010 Through 30-06-2010",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Encouraging undergraduates’ academic writing development in e-learning contexts that students access independently or in subject-based groups

AU - Day, Trevor

AU - Humphreys, Linda

AU - Duncombe, Bridgette

PY - 2010/6/29

Y1 - 2010/6/29

N2 - E-learning approaches employed in a variety of contexts, from instructional to collaborative and contested, currently support academic writing development (e.g. Goodfellow, 2005; Peretz, 2005; Brown et al., 2008). This paper is an early report on progress in developing a suite of six instructional e-learning modules on aspects of critical reading and writing at a research-intensive, science- and engineering-strong university. At this university, non-remedial academic writing development is supported by subject teaching staff, Royal Literary Fund Fellows, the English Language Centre and through information skills courses run by the Library. The current project seeks to complement the existing provision by providing undergraduates with guidance through e-learning modules that engage the students in learning tasks that can be completed independently or under the guidance of teaching staff in subject disciplines (shifting between more instructional to more cognitive-constructivist and social-constructivist approaches; Mayes and de Freitas, 2004). Strengths of the e-learning project include collaboration between staff from widely different backgrounds, including a professional writer and academic writing facilitator, a faculty librarian, and a teaching fellow. In addition, detailed feedback on each module’s learning efficacy and ease-of-use is being gathered systematically from students both during the module’s development and after its launch. In designing the e-modules, the researchers and developers have been driven by pedagogical imperatives (Mayes and de Freitas, 2004; Beetham and Sharpe, 2007; Biggs and Tang, 2007; Race, 2007) rather than wishing to be led or overly constrained by perceived limitations of online technologies. Among the challenges have been how to design online activities that facilitate deep learning (Marton and Säljö, 1976; Biggs, 1987) and how to create experiences that are relevant to students from a variety of disciplines. The paper will consider the extent to which such aspirations have been met.

AB - E-learning approaches employed in a variety of contexts, from instructional to collaborative and contested, currently support academic writing development (e.g. Goodfellow, 2005; Peretz, 2005; Brown et al., 2008). This paper is an early report on progress in developing a suite of six instructional e-learning modules on aspects of critical reading and writing at a research-intensive, science- and engineering-strong university. At this university, non-remedial academic writing development is supported by subject teaching staff, Royal Literary Fund Fellows, the English Language Centre and through information skills courses run by the Library. The current project seeks to complement the existing provision by providing undergraduates with guidance through e-learning modules that engage the students in learning tasks that can be completed independently or under the guidance of teaching staff in subject disciplines (shifting between more instructional to more cognitive-constructivist and social-constructivist approaches; Mayes and de Freitas, 2004). Strengths of the e-learning project include collaboration between staff from widely different backgrounds, including a professional writer and academic writing facilitator, a faculty librarian, and a teaching fellow. In addition, detailed feedback on each module’s learning efficacy and ease-of-use is being gathered systematically from students both during the module’s development and after its launch. In designing the e-modules, the researchers and developers have been driven by pedagogical imperatives (Mayes and de Freitas, 2004; Beetham and Sharpe, 2007; Biggs and Tang, 2007; Race, 2007) rather than wishing to be led or overly constrained by perceived limitations of online technologies. Among the challenges have been how to design online activities that facilitate deep learning (Marton and Säljö, 1976; Biggs, 1987) and how to create experiences that are relevant to students from a variety of disciplines. The paper will consider the extent to which such aspirations have been met.

KW - instructional

KW - surface learning

KW - strategic learning

KW - deep learning

KW - e-learning

KW - online

M3 - Paper

ER -