Empowering interventions to promote sustainable lifestyles

testing the habit discontinuity hypothesis in a field experiment

Bas Verplanken, Deborah Roy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)
74 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study tested the habit discontinuity hypothesis, which states that behaviour change interventions are more effective when delivered in the context of life course changes. The assumption is that when habits are (temporarily) disturbed, people are more sensitive to new information and adopt a mind-set that is conducive to behaviour change. A field experiment was conducted among 800 participants, who received an intervention promoting sustainable behaviours, or were in a no-intervention control condition. In both conditions half of the households had recently relocated, and were matched with households which had not relocated. Self-reported frequencies of twenty-five environment-related behaviours were assessed at baseline and eight weeks later. While controlling for past behaviour, habit strength, intentions, perceived control, biospheric values, personal norms, and personal involvement, the intervention was more effective among recently relocated participants. The results also suggested that the duration of the ‘window of opportunity’ was three months after relocation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-134
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Environmental Psychology
Volume45
Early online date7 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

Habits
Life Style

Cite this

@article{84bf48f83631434fa6b0daf80a69ccff,
title = "Empowering interventions to promote sustainable lifestyles: testing the habit discontinuity hypothesis in a field experiment",
abstract = "This study tested the habit discontinuity hypothesis, which states that behaviour change interventions are more effective when delivered in the context of life course changes. The assumption is that when habits are (temporarily) disturbed, people are more sensitive to new information and adopt a mind-set that is conducive to behaviour change. A field experiment was conducted among 800 participants, who received an intervention promoting sustainable behaviours, or were in a no-intervention control condition. In both conditions half of the households had recently relocated, and were matched with households which had not relocated. Self-reported frequencies of twenty-five environment-related behaviours were assessed at baseline and eight weeks later. While controlling for past behaviour, habit strength, intentions, perceived control, biospheric values, personal norms, and personal involvement, the intervention was more effective among recently relocated participants. The results also suggested that the duration of the ‘window of opportunity’ was three months after relocation.",
author = "Bas Verplanken and Deborah Roy",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.008",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "127--134",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Psychology",
issn = "0272-4944",
publisher = "Elsevier Academic Press Inc",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empowering interventions to promote sustainable lifestyles

T2 - testing the habit discontinuity hypothesis in a field experiment

AU - Verplanken, Bas

AU - Roy, Deborah

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - This study tested the habit discontinuity hypothesis, which states that behaviour change interventions are more effective when delivered in the context of life course changes. The assumption is that when habits are (temporarily) disturbed, people are more sensitive to new information and adopt a mind-set that is conducive to behaviour change. A field experiment was conducted among 800 participants, who received an intervention promoting sustainable behaviours, or were in a no-intervention control condition. In both conditions half of the households had recently relocated, and were matched with households which had not relocated. Self-reported frequencies of twenty-five environment-related behaviours were assessed at baseline and eight weeks later. While controlling for past behaviour, habit strength, intentions, perceived control, biospheric values, personal norms, and personal involvement, the intervention was more effective among recently relocated participants. The results also suggested that the duration of the ‘window of opportunity’ was three months after relocation.

AB - This study tested the habit discontinuity hypothesis, which states that behaviour change interventions are more effective when delivered in the context of life course changes. The assumption is that when habits are (temporarily) disturbed, people are more sensitive to new information and adopt a mind-set that is conducive to behaviour change. A field experiment was conducted among 800 participants, who received an intervention promoting sustainable behaviours, or were in a no-intervention control condition. In both conditions half of the households had recently relocated, and were matched with households which had not relocated. Self-reported frequencies of twenty-five environment-related behaviours were assessed at baseline and eight weeks later. While controlling for past behaviour, habit strength, intentions, perceived control, biospheric values, personal norms, and personal involvement, the intervention was more effective among recently relocated participants. The results also suggested that the duration of the ‘window of opportunity’ was three months after relocation.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.008

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 127

EP - 134

JO - Journal of Environmental Psychology

JF - Journal of Environmental Psychology

SN - 0272-4944

ER -