Empirical support for radiographic review

a follow-up study of total hip arthroplasty

Lindsay K Smith, Fiona Cramp, Shea Palmer, Nikki Coghill, Robert F Spencer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Routine post surgery surveillance of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is widely recommended to identify asymptomatic failure but inclusion of an x-ray adds to service costs. Evidence is needed to support orthopaedic opinion in order to identify what should be included in surveillance. An investigation was conducted to establish whether an x-ray is needed in addition to patient reported outcome measures. One hundred and fifty-four THA had been assessed at 3 years and were reviewed again at 6 to 9 years (mid-term) when radiographic signs of deterioration commonly appear. Data were explored for associations between radiographic changes and changes in the participants’ Oxford Hip Score, age, EuroQol 5-D score or comorbidities. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed that the number of radiographic changes could not be predicted by any of the other variables. This supports the inclusion of an x-ray in THA surveillance and suggests that the state of the THA cannot be determined by the use of patient reported outcome measures alone. This has implications for future arthroplasty surveillance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-86
JournalHip International
Volume23
Issue number1
Early online date20 Nov 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Hip
X-Rays
Orthopedics
Comorbidity
Regression Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Cite this

Empirical support for radiographic review : a follow-up study of total hip arthroplasty. / Smith, Lindsay K; Cramp, Fiona; Palmer, Shea; Coghill, Nikki; Spencer, Robert F.

In: Hip International, Vol. 23, No. 1, 21.02.2013, p. 80-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Lindsay K ; Cramp, Fiona ; Palmer, Shea ; Coghill, Nikki ; Spencer, Robert F. / Empirical support for radiographic review : a follow-up study of total hip arthroplasty. In: Hip International. 2013 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 80-86.
@article{9c69774a3b674dc1a30498f72299ea59,
title = "Empirical support for radiographic review: a follow-up study of total hip arthroplasty",
abstract = "Routine post surgery surveillance of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is widely recommended to identify asymptomatic failure but inclusion of an x-ray adds to service costs. Evidence is needed to support orthopaedic opinion in order to identify what should be included in surveillance. An investigation was conducted to establish whether an x-ray is needed in addition to patient reported outcome measures. One hundred and fifty-four THA had been assessed at 3 years and were reviewed again at 6 to 9 years (mid-term) when radiographic signs of deterioration commonly appear. Data were explored for associations between radiographic changes and changes in the participants’ Oxford Hip Score, age, EuroQol 5-D score or comorbidities. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed that the number of radiographic changes could not be predicted by any of the other variables. This supports the inclusion of an x-ray in THA surveillance and suggests that the state of the THA cannot be determined by the use of patient reported outcome measures alone. This has implications for future arthroplasty surveillance.",
author = "Smith, {Lindsay K} and Fiona Cramp and Shea Palmer and Nikki Coghill and Spencer, {Robert F}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "21",
doi = "10.5301/HIP.2012.9912",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "80--86",
journal = "Hip International",
issn = "1724-6067",
publisher = "Wichtig Publishing",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empirical support for radiographic review

T2 - a follow-up study of total hip arthroplasty

AU - Smith, Lindsay K

AU - Cramp, Fiona

AU - Palmer, Shea

AU - Coghill, Nikki

AU - Spencer, Robert F

PY - 2013/2/21

Y1 - 2013/2/21

N2 - Routine post surgery surveillance of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is widely recommended to identify asymptomatic failure but inclusion of an x-ray adds to service costs. Evidence is needed to support orthopaedic opinion in order to identify what should be included in surveillance. An investigation was conducted to establish whether an x-ray is needed in addition to patient reported outcome measures. One hundred and fifty-four THA had been assessed at 3 years and were reviewed again at 6 to 9 years (mid-term) when radiographic signs of deterioration commonly appear. Data were explored for associations between radiographic changes and changes in the participants’ Oxford Hip Score, age, EuroQol 5-D score or comorbidities. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed that the number of radiographic changes could not be predicted by any of the other variables. This supports the inclusion of an x-ray in THA surveillance and suggests that the state of the THA cannot be determined by the use of patient reported outcome measures alone. This has implications for future arthroplasty surveillance.

AB - Routine post surgery surveillance of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is widely recommended to identify asymptomatic failure but inclusion of an x-ray adds to service costs. Evidence is needed to support orthopaedic opinion in order to identify what should be included in surveillance. An investigation was conducted to establish whether an x-ray is needed in addition to patient reported outcome measures. One hundred and fifty-four THA had been assessed at 3 years and were reviewed again at 6 to 9 years (mid-term) when radiographic signs of deterioration commonly appear. Data were explored for associations between radiographic changes and changes in the participants’ Oxford Hip Score, age, EuroQol 5-D score or comorbidities. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed that the number of radiographic changes could not be predicted by any of the other variables. This supports the inclusion of an x-ray in THA surveillance and suggests that the state of the THA cannot be determined by the use of patient reported outcome measures alone. This has implications for future arthroplasty surveillance.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/HIP.2012.9912

U2 - 10.5301/HIP.2012.9912

DO - 10.5301/HIP.2012.9912

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 80

EP - 86

JO - Hip International

JF - Hip International

SN - 1724-6067

IS - 1

ER -