Embodiment vs. Memetics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The term embodiment identifies a theory that meaning and semantics cannot be captured by abstract, logical systems, but are dependent on an agent’s experience derived from being situated in an environment. This theory has recently received a great deal of support in the cognitive science literature and is having significant impact in artificial intelligence. Memetics refers to the theory that knowledge and ideas can evolve more or less independently of their human-agent substrates. While humans provide the medium for this evolution, memetics holds that ideas can be developed without human comprehension or deliberate interference. Both theories have profound implications for the study of language—its potential use by machines, its acquisition by children and of particular relevance to this special issue, its evolution. This article links the theory of memetics to the established literature on semantic space, then examines the extent to which these memetic mechanisms might account for language independently of embodiment. It then seeks to explain the evolution of language through uniquely human cognitive capacities which facilitate memetic evolution.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-94
Number of pages18
JournalMind & Society
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

language
artificial intelligence
interference
comprehension
semantics
science
literature

Cite this

Embodiment vs. Memetics. / Bryson, Joanna J.

In: Mind & Society, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2008, p. 77-94.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bryson, Joanna J. / Embodiment vs. Memetics. In: Mind & Society. 2008 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 77-94.
@article{1b78a10a6c864e6e84cf7a8bfc8732b1,
title = "Embodiment vs. Memetics",
abstract = "The term embodiment identifies a theory that meaning and semantics cannot be captured by abstract, logical systems, but are dependent on an agent’s experience derived from being situated in an environment. This theory has recently received a great deal of support in the cognitive science literature and is having significant impact in artificial intelligence. Memetics refers to the theory that knowledge and ideas can evolve more or less independently of their human-agent substrates. While humans provide the medium for this evolution, memetics holds that ideas can be developed without human comprehension or deliberate interference. Both theories have profound implications for the study of language—its potential use by machines, its acquisition by children and of particular relevance to this special issue, its evolution. This article links the theory of memetics to the established literature on semantic space, then examines the extent to which these memetic mechanisms might account for language independently of embodiment. It then seeks to explain the evolution of language through uniquely human cognitive capacities which facilitate memetic evolution.",
author = "Bryson, {Joanna J}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1007/s11299-007-0044-4",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "77--94",
journal = "Mind & Society",
issn = "1860-1839",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embodiment vs. Memetics

AU - Bryson, Joanna J

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The term embodiment identifies a theory that meaning and semantics cannot be captured by abstract, logical systems, but are dependent on an agent’s experience derived from being situated in an environment. This theory has recently received a great deal of support in the cognitive science literature and is having significant impact in artificial intelligence. Memetics refers to the theory that knowledge and ideas can evolve more or less independently of their human-agent substrates. While humans provide the medium for this evolution, memetics holds that ideas can be developed without human comprehension or deliberate interference. Both theories have profound implications for the study of language—its potential use by machines, its acquisition by children and of particular relevance to this special issue, its evolution. This article links the theory of memetics to the established literature on semantic space, then examines the extent to which these memetic mechanisms might account for language independently of embodiment. It then seeks to explain the evolution of language through uniquely human cognitive capacities which facilitate memetic evolution.

AB - The term embodiment identifies a theory that meaning and semantics cannot be captured by abstract, logical systems, but are dependent on an agent’s experience derived from being situated in an environment. This theory has recently received a great deal of support in the cognitive science literature and is having significant impact in artificial intelligence. Memetics refers to the theory that knowledge and ideas can evolve more or less independently of their human-agent substrates. While humans provide the medium for this evolution, memetics holds that ideas can be developed without human comprehension or deliberate interference. Both theories have profound implications for the study of language—its potential use by machines, its acquisition by children and of particular relevance to this special issue, its evolution. This article links the theory of memetics to the established literature on semantic space, then examines the extent to which these memetic mechanisms might account for language independently of embodiment. It then seeks to explain the evolution of language through uniquely human cognitive capacities which facilitate memetic evolution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43949094488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11299-007-0044-4

U2 - 10.1007/s11299-007-0044-4

DO - 10.1007/s11299-007-0044-4

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 77

EP - 94

JO - Mind & Society

JF - Mind & Society

SN - 1860-1839

IS - 1

ER -