Embedding artificial intelligence in society: looking beyond the EU AI master plan using the culture cycle

Simone Borsci, Ville V. Lehtola, Francesco Nex, Michael Ying Yang, Ellen Wien Augustijn, Leila Bagheriye, Christoph Brune, Ourania Kounadi, Jamy Li, Joao Moreira, Joanne Van Der Nagel, Bernard Veldkamp, Duc V. Le, Mingshu Wang, Fons Wijnhoven, Jelmer M. Wolterink, Raul Zurita-Milla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

The European Union (EU) Commission’s whitepaper on Artificial Intelligence (AI) proposes shaping the emerging AI market so that it better reflects common European values. It is a master plan that builds upon the EU AI High-Level Expert Group guidelines. This article reviews the masterplan, from a culture cycle perspective, to reflect on its potential clashes with current societal, technical, and methodological constraints. We identify two main obstacles in the implementation of this plan: (i) the lack of a coherent EU vision to drive future decision-making processes at state and local levels and (ii) the lack of methods to support a sustainable diffusion of AI in our society. The lack of a coherent vision stems from not considering societal differences across the EU member states. We suggest that these differences may lead to a fractured market and an AI crisis in which different members of the EU will adopt nation-centric strategies to exploit AI, thus preventing the development of a frictionless market as envisaged by the EU. Moreover, the Commission aims at changing the AI development culture proposing a human-centred and safety-first perspective that is not supported by methodological advancements, thus taking the risks of unforeseen social and societal impacts of AI. We discuss potential societal, technical, and methodological gaps that should be filled to avoid the risks of developing AI systems at the expense of society. Our analysis results in the recommendation that the EU regulators and policymakers consider how to complement the EC programme with rules and compensatory mechanisms to avoid market fragmentation due to local and global ambitions. Moreover, regulators should go beyond the human-centred approach establishing a research agenda seeking answers to the technical and methodological open questions regarding the development and assessment of human-AI co-action aiming for a sustainable AI diffusion in the society.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1465-1484
Number of pages20
JournalAI and Society
Volume38
Issue number4
Early online date22 Jan 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).

Funding

The support from the Digital Society Institute (DSI) of the University of Twente is acknowledged. Also, we would like to credit Dr Birna van Riemsdijk who contributed in terms of conceptualization of the present work, and the formalization of the original draft; Stephanie Hessing who contributed in terms of conceptualization and by reviewing and editing the final draft. We received no funding for this work, but we were supported by the Digital Society Institute of our University (University of Twente) and this institute is going to pay for the Open Access publication. We acknowledge the support of the Digital Society Institute in the acknowledgement section.

FundersFunder number
University of Edinburgh
Digital Society Institute of our University
University of Twente

    Keywords

    • AI Policies
    • Artificial intelligence
    • Human artificial intelligence interaction
    • Societal impact
    • Symbiosis of AI and Humans
    • Trust

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Philosophy
    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Artificial Intelligence

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Embedding artificial intelligence in society: looking beyond the EU AI master plan using the culture cycle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this