Efficacy of a movement control injury prevention programme in adult men’s community rugby union: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Matthew Attwood, Simon Roberts, Grant Trewartha, Mike England, Keith Stokes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exercise programmes aimed at reducing injury have been shown to be efficacious for some non-collision sports, but evidence in adult men's collision sports such as rugby union is lacking.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a movement control injury prevention exercise programme for reducing match injuries in adult men's community rugby union players.

METHODS: 856 clubs were invited to participate in this prospective cluster randomised (single-blind) controlled trial where clubs were the unit of randomisation. 81 volunteered and were randomly assigned (intervention/control). A 42-week exercise programme was followed throughout the season. The control programme reflected 'normal practice' exercises, whereas the intervention focused on proprioception, balance, cutting, landing and resistance exercises.Outcome measures were match injury incidence and burden for: (1) all ≥8 days time-loss injuries and (2) targeted (lower limb, shoulder, head and neck, excluding fractures and lacerations) ≥8 days time-loss injuries.

RESULTS: Poisson regression identified no clear effects on overall injury outcomes. A likely beneficial difference in targeted injury incidence (rate ratio (RR), 90% CI=0.6, 0.4 to 1.0) was identified, with a 40% reduction in lower-limb incidence (RR, 90% CI=0.6, 0.4 to 1.0) and a 60% reduction in concussion incidence (RR, 90% CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.7) in the intervention group. Comparison between arms for clubs with highest compliance (≥median compliance) demonstrated very likely beneficial 60% reductions in targeted injury incidence (RR, 90% CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.8) and targeted injury burden (RR, 90% CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS: The movement control injury prevention programme resulted in likely beneficial reductions in lower-limb injuries and concussion. Higher intervention compliance was associated with reduced targeted injury incidence and burden.

Original languageEnglish
Article number290
Pages (from-to)368-374
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume52
Issue number6
Early online date12 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Football
Randomized Controlled Trials
Wounds and Injuries
Exercise
Incidence
Compliance
Lower Extremity
Sports
Proprioception
Lacerations
Random Allocation
Arm
Neck

Keywords

  • concussion
  • injury prevention
  • lower limb
  • neuromuscular
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Prospective Studies
  • Athletic Injuries/prevention & control
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Brain Concussion/prevention & control
  • Incidence
  • Young Adult
  • Football/injuries
  • Adult
  • Physical Conditioning, Human/methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Efficacy of a movement control injury prevention programme in adult men’s community rugby union: a cluster randomised controlled trial. / Attwood, Matthew; Roberts, Simon; Trewartha, Grant; England, Mike; Stokes, Keith.

In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 52, No. 6, 290, 01.03.2018, p. 368-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9510aee3f018490b98e415f6d1efd83d,
title = "Efficacy of a movement control injury prevention programme in adult men’s community rugby union: a cluster randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Exercise programmes aimed at reducing injury have been shown to be efficacious for some non-collision sports, but evidence in adult men's collision sports such as rugby union is lacking.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a movement control injury prevention exercise programme for reducing match injuries in adult men's community rugby union players.METHODS: 856 clubs were invited to participate in this prospective cluster randomised (single-blind) controlled trial where clubs were the unit of randomisation. 81 volunteered and were randomly assigned (intervention/control). A 42-week exercise programme was followed throughout the season. The control programme reflected 'normal practice' exercises, whereas the intervention focused on proprioception, balance, cutting, landing and resistance exercises.Outcome measures were match injury incidence and burden for: (1) all ≥8 days time-loss injuries and (2) targeted (lower limb, shoulder, head and neck, excluding fractures and lacerations) ≥8 days time-loss injuries.RESULTS: Poisson regression identified no clear effects on overall injury outcomes. A likely beneficial difference in targeted injury incidence (rate ratio (RR), 90{\%} CI=0.6, 0.4 to 1.0) was identified, with a 40{\%} reduction in lower-limb incidence (RR, 90{\%} CI=0.6, 0.4 to 1.0) and a 60{\%} reduction in concussion incidence (RR, 90{\%} CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.7) in the intervention group. Comparison between arms for clubs with highest compliance (≥median compliance) demonstrated very likely beneficial 60{\%} reductions in targeted injury incidence (RR, 90{\%} CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.8) and targeted injury burden (RR, 90{\%} CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.7).CONCLUSIONS: The movement control injury prevention programme resulted in likely beneficial reductions in lower-limb injuries and concussion. Higher intervention compliance was associated with reduced targeted injury incidence and burden.",
keywords = "concussion, injury prevention, lower limb, neuromuscular, Single-Blind Method, Prospective Studies, Athletic Injuries/prevention & control, Humans, Male, Brain Concussion/prevention & control, Incidence, Young Adult, Football/injuries, Adult, Physical Conditioning, Human/methods",
author = "Matthew Attwood and Simon Roberts and Grant Trewartha and Mike England and Keith Stokes",
note = "{\circledC} Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bjsports-2017-098005",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "368--374",
journal = "British Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0306-3674",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of a movement control injury prevention programme in adult men’s community rugby union: a cluster randomised controlled trial

AU - Attwood, Matthew

AU - Roberts, Simon

AU - Trewartha, Grant

AU - England, Mike

AU - Stokes, Keith

N1 - © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Exercise programmes aimed at reducing injury have been shown to be efficacious for some non-collision sports, but evidence in adult men's collision sports such as rugby union is lacking.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a movement control injury prevention exercise programme for reducing match injuries in adult men's community rugby union players.METHODS: 856 clubs were invited to participate in this prospective cluster randomised (single-blind) controlled trial where clubs were the unit of randomisation. 81 volunteered and were randomly assigned (intervention/control). A 42-week exercise programme was followed throughout the season. The control programme reflected 'normal practice' exercises, whereas the intervention focused on proprioception, balance, cutting, landing and resistance exercises.Outcome measures were match injury incidence and burden for: (1) all ≥8 days time-loss injuries and (2) targeted (lower limb, shoulder, head and neck, excluding fractures and lacerations) ≥8 days time-loss injuries.RESULTS: Poisson regression identified no clear effects on overall injury outcomes. A likely beneficial difference in targeted injury incidence (rate ratio (RR), 90% CI=0.6, 0.4 to 1.0) was identified, with a 40% reduction in lower-limb incidence (RR, 90% CI=0.6, 0.4 to 1.0) and a 60% reduction in concussion incidence (RR, 90% CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.7) in the intervention group. Comparison between arms for clubs with highest compliance (≥median compliance) demonstrated very likely beneficial 60% reductions in targeted injury incidence (RR, 90% CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.8) and targeted injury burden (RR, 90% CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.7).CONCLUSIONS: The movement control injury prevention programme resulted in likely beneficial reductions in lower-limb injuries and concussion. Higher intervention compliance was associated with reduced targeted injury incidence and burden.

AB - BACKGROUND: Exercise programmes aimed at reducing injury have been shown to be efficacious for some non-collision sports, but evidence in adult men's collision sports such as rugby union is lacking.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a movement control injury prevention exercise programme for reducing match injuries in adult men's community rugby union players.METHODS: 856 clubs were invited to participate in this prospective cluster randomised (single-blind) controlled trial where clubs were the unit of randomisation. 81 volunteered and were randomly assigned (intervention/control). A 42-week exercise programme was followed throughout the season. The control programme reflected 'normal practice' exercises, whereas the intervention focused on proprioception, balance, cutting, landing and resistance exercises.Outcome measures were match injury incidence and burden for: (1) all ≥8 days time-loss injuries and (2) targeted (lower limb, shoulder, head and neck, excluding fractures and lacerations) ≥8 days time-loss injuries.RESULTS: Poisson regression identified no clear effects on overall injury outcomes. A likely beneficial difference in targeted injury incidence (rate ratio (RR), 90% CI=0.6, 0.4 to 1.0) was identified, with a 40% reduction in lower-limb incidence (RR, 90% CI=0.6, 0.4 to 1.0) and a 60% reduction in concussion incidence (RR, 90% CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.7) in the intervention group. Comparison between arms for clubs with highest compliance (≥median compliance) demonstrated very likely beneficial 60% reductions in targeted injury incidence (RR, 90% CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.8) and targeted injury burden (RR, 90% CI=0.4, 0.2 to 0.7).CONCLUSIONS: The movement control injury prevention programme resulted in likely beneficial reductions in lower-limb injuries and concussion. Higher intervention compliance was associated with reduced targeted injury incidence and burden.

KW - concussion

KW - injury prevention

KW - lower limb

KW - neuromuscular

KW - Single-Blind Method

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Athletic Injuries/prevention & control

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Brain Concussion/prevention & control

KW - Incidence

KW - Young Adult

KW - Football/injuries

KW - Adult

KW - Physical Conditioning, Human/methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044621442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098005

DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098005

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 368

EP - 374

JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0306-3674

IS - 6

M1 - 290

ER -