Effects of model choice, network structure and interaction strengths on knockout extinction models of ecological robustness

Miranda Bane, Michael Pocock, Richard James

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Analysis of ecological networks is a valuable approach to understanding the vulnerability of systems to disturbance. The tolerance of ecological networks to coextinctions, resulting from sequences of primary extinctions (here termed “knockout extinction models”, in contrast with other dynamic approaches), is a widely used tool for modeling network “robustness”. Currently, there is an emphasis to increase biological realism in these models, but less attention has been given to the effect of model choices and network structure on robustness measures. Here, we present a suite of knockout extinction models for bipartite ecological networks (specifically plant–pollinator networks) that can all be analyzed on the same terms, enabling us to test the effects of extinction rules, interaction weights, and network structure on robustness. We include two simple ecologically plausible models of propagating extinctions, one new and one adapted from existing models. All models can be used with weighted or binary interaction data. We found that the choice of extinction rules impacts robustness; our two propagating models produce opposing effects in all tests on observed plant–pollinator networks. Adding weights to the interactions tends to amplify the opposing effects and increase the variation in robustness. Variation in robustness is a key feature of these extinction models and is driven by the structural heterogeneity of nodes (specifically, the skewness of the plant degree distribution) in the network. Our analysis therefore reveals the mechanisms and fundamental network properties that drive observed trends in robustness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10794-10804
Number of pages11
JournalEcology & Evolution
Volume8
Issue number22
Early online date31 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Keywords

  • coextinction
  • ecological interactions
  • extinction models
  • mutualistic network
  • network
  • plant–pollinator communities
  • pollinators
  • robustness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Effects of model choice, network structure and interaction strengths on knockout extinction models of ecological robustness. / Bane, Miranda; Pocock, Michael; James, Richard.

In: Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 8, No. 22, 01.11.2018, p. 10794-10804.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Bane, M, Pocock, M & James, R 2018, 'Effects of model choice, network structure and interaction strengths on knockout extinction models of ecological robustness', Ecology & Evolution, vol. 8, no. 22, pp. 10794-10804. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4529
Bane M, Pocock M, James R. Effects of model choice, network structure and interaction strengths on knockout extinction models of ecological robustness. Ecology & Evolution. 2018 Nov 1;8(22):10794-10804. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4529
Bane, Miranda ; Pocock, Michael ; James, Richard. / Effects of model choice, network structure and interaction strengths on knockout extinction models of ecological robustness. In: Ecology & Evolution. 2018 ; Vol. 8, No. 22. pp. 10794-10804.
@article{d6cd7d67fb92442393e2d957fd95aaf8,
title = "Effects of model choice, network structure and interaction strengths on knockout extinction models of ecological robustness",
abstract = "Analysis of ecological networks is a valuable approach to understanding the vulnerability of systems to disturbance. The tolerance of ecological networks to coextinctions, resulting from sequences of primary extinctions (here termed “knockout extinction models”, in contrast with other dynamic approaches), is a widely used tool for modeling network “robustness”. Currently, there is an emphasis to increase biological realism in these models, but less attention has been given to the effect of model choices and network structure on robustness measures. Here, we present a suite of knockout extinction models for bipartite ecological networks (specifically plant–pollinator networks) that can all be analyzed on the same terms, enabling us to test the effects of extinction rules, interaction weights, and network structure on robustness. We include two simple ecologically plausible models of propagating extinctions, one new and one adapted from existing models. All models can be used with weighted or binary interaction data. We found that the choice of extinction rules impacts robustness; our two propagating models produce opposing effects in all tests on observed plant–pollinator networks. Adding weights to the interactions tends to amplify the opposing effects and increase the variation in robustness. Variation in robustness is a key feature of these extinction models and is driven by the structural heterogeneity of nodes (specifically, the skewness of the plant degree distribution) in the network. Our analysis therefore reveals the mechanisms and fundamental network properties that drive observed trends in robustness.",
keywords = "coextinction, ecological interactions, extinction models, mutualistic network, network, plant–pollinator communities, pollinators, robustness",
author = "Miranda Bane and Michael Pocock and Richard James",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ece3.4529",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "10794--10804",
journal = "Ecology & Evolution",
issn = "2045-7758",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of model choice, network structure and interaction strengths on knockout extinction models of ecological robustness

AU - Bane, Miranda

AU - Pocock, Michael

AU - James, Richard

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Analysis of ecological networks is a valuable approach to understanding the vulnerability of systems to disturbance. The tolerance of ecological networks to coextinctions, resulting from sequences of primary extinctions (here termed “knockout extinction models”, in contrast with other dynamic approaches), is a widely used tool for modeling network “robustness”. Currently, there is an emphasis to increase biological realism in these models, but less attention has been given to the effect of model choices and network structure on robustness measures. Here, we present a suite of knockout extinction models for bipartite ecological networks (specifically plant–pollinator networks) that can all be analyzed on the same terms, enabling us to test the effects of extinction rules, interaction weights, and network structure on robustness. We include two simple ecologically plausible models of propagating extinctions, one new and one adapted from existing models. All models can be used with weighted or binary interaction data. We found that the choice of extinction rules impacts robustness; our two propagating models produce opposing effects in all tests on observed plant–pollinator networks. Adding weights to the interactions tends to amplify the opposing effects and increase the variation in robustness. Variation in robustness is a key feature of these extinction models and is driven by the structural heterogeneity of nodes (specifically, the skewness of the plant degree distribution) in the network. Our analysis therefore reveals the mechanisms and fundamental network properties that drive observed trends in robustness.

AB - Analysis of ecological networks is a valuable approach to understanding the vulnerability of systems to disturbance. The tolerance of ecological networks to coextinctions, resulting from sequences of primary extinctions (here termed “knockout extinction models”, in contrast with other dynamic approaches), is a widely used tool for modeling network “robustness”. Currently, there is an emphasis to increase biological realism in these models, but less attention has been given to the effect of model choices and network structure on robustness measures. Here, we present a suite of knockout extinction models for bipartite ecological networks (specifically plant–pollinator networks) that can all be analyzed on the same terms, enabling us to test the effects of extinction rules, interaction weights, and network structure on robustness. We include two simple ecologically plausible models of propagating extinctions, one new and one adapted from existing models. All models can be used with weighted or binary interaction data. We found that the choice of extinction rules impacts robustness; our two propagating models produce opposing effects in all tests on observed plant–pollinator networks. Adding weights to the interactions tends to amplify the opposing effects and increase the variation in robustness. Variation in robustness is a key feature of these extinction models and is driven by the structural heterogeneity of nodes (specifically, the skewness of the plant degree distribution) in the network. Our analysis therefore reveals the mechanisms and fundamental network properties that drive observed trends in robustness.

KW - coextinction

KW - ecological interactions

KW - extinction models

KW - mutualistic network

KW - network

KW - plant–pollinator communities

KW - pollinators

KW - robustness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055875131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ece3.4529

DO - 10.1002/ece3.4529

M3 - Article

C2 - 30519407

VL - 8

SP - 10794

EP - 10804

JO - Ecology & Evolution

JF - Ecology & Evolution

SN - 2045-7758

IS - 22

ER -

Access to Document