Effects of 7.5% CO2 inhalation on allocation of spatial attention to facial cues of emotional expression

Robbie M. Cooper, Jayne E. Bailey, Alison Diaper, Rachel Stirland, Lynne E. Renton, Christopher P. Benton, Ian S. Penton-Voak, David J. Nutt, Marcus R. Munafò

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Increased vigilance to threat-related stimuli is thought to be a core cognitive feature of anxiety. We sought to investigate the cognitive impact of experimentally induced anxiety, by means of a 7.5% CO2 challenge, which acts as an unconditioned anxiogenic stimulus, on attentional bias for positive and negative facial cues of emotional expression in the dot-probe task. In two experiments we found robust physiological and infjective effects of the CO2 inhalation consistent with the claim that the procedure reliably induces anxiety. Data from the dot-probe task demonstrated an attentional bias to emotional facial expressions compared with neutral faces regardless of valence (happy, angry, and fearful). These attentional effects, however, were entirely inconsistent in terms of their relationship with induced anxiety. We conclude that the previously reported poor reliability of this task is the most parsimonious explanation for our conflicting findings and that future research should develop a more reliable paradigm for measuring attentional bias in this field.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)626-638
Number of pages13
JournalCognition and Emotion
Volume25
Issue number4
Early online date24 Jan 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2011

Keywords

  • 7.5% CO
  • Anxiety
  • Attentional bias
  • Emotion
  • Reliability
  • Visual probe

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of 7.5% CO2 inhalation on allocation of spatial attention to facial cues of emotional expression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this