Abstract
Aim: To examine whether government-funded tobacco control television advertising shown in England between 2002 and 2010 reduced adult smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption.
Design: Analysis of monthly cross-sectional surveys using generalised additive models. Setting: England.
Participants: More than 80000 adults aged 18 years or over living in England and interviewed in the Opinions and Lifestyle Survey.
Measurements: Current smoking status, smokers' daily cigarette consumption, tobacco control gross rating points (GRPs-a measure of per capita advertising exposure combining reach and frequency), cigarette costliness, tobacco control activity, socio-demographic variables.
Findings: After adjusting for other tobacco control policies, cigarette costliness and individual characteristics, we found that a 400-point increase in tobacco control GRPs per month, equivalent to all adults in the population seeing four advertisements per month (although actual individual-level exposure varies according to TV exposure), was associated with 3% lower odds of smoking 2months later [odds ratio (OR)=0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.95, 0.999] and accounted for 13.5% of the decline in smoking prevalence seen over this period. In smokers, a 400-point increase in GRPs was associated with a 1.80% (95%CI=0.47, 3.11) reduction in average cigarette consumption in the following month and accounted for 11.2% of the total decline in consumption over the period 2002-09.
Conclusion: Government-funded tobacco control television advertising shown in England between 2002 and 2010 was associated with reductions in smoking prevalence and smokers' cigarette consumption.
Design: Analysis of monthly cross-sectional surveys using generalised additive models. Setting: England.
Participants: More than 80000 adults aged 18 years or over living in England and interviewed in the Opinions and Lifestyle Survey.
Measurements: Current smoking status, smokers' daily cigarette consumption, tobacco control gross rating points (GRPs-a measure of per capita advertising exposure combining reach and frequency), cigarette costliness, tobacco control activity, socio-demographic variables.
Findings: After adjusting for other tobacco control policies, cigarette costliness and individual characteristics, we found that a 400-point increase in tobacco control GRPs per month, equivalent to all adults in the population seeing four advertisements per month (although actual individual-level exposure varies according to TV exposure), was associated with 3% lower odds of smoking 2months later [odds ratio (OR)=0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.95, 0.999] and accounted for 13.5% of the decline in smoking prevalence seen over this period. In smokers, a 400-point increase in GRPs was associated with a 1.80% (95%CI=0.47, 3.11) reduction in average cigarette consumption in the following month and accounted for 11.2% of the total decline in consumption over the period 2002-09.
Conclusion: Government-funded tobacco control television advertising shown in England between 2002 and 2010 was associated with reductions in smoking prevalence and smokers' cigarette consumption.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 986-994 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Addiction |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 28 Jan 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of tobacco control television advertising in changing tobacco use in England: a population-based cross-sectional study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Anna Gilmore
- Department for Health - Professor
- Tobacco Control Research Group (TCRG)
- Centre for 21st Century Public Health - Co-Director
- Centre for Governance, Regulation and Industrial Strategy
Person: Research & Teaching, Core staff
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS