Effectiveness of Nanolime as a Stone Consolidant: A 4-Year Study of Six Common UK Limestones

Stelios Tzavellos, Giovanni Pesce, Yu Wu, Alison Henry, Simon Robson, Richard Ball

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Protecting stone buildings from weathering and decay is a major challenge in the
conservation of built heritage. Most of the stone consolidants currently available are well suited to silicate stones, but are less compatible with limestone. In this paper we present for the first time the results over a 4-year period of various consolidation treatments carried out using nanolime on 6 of the most representative and significant stones used in historic buildings in the United Kingdom. Tests investigated the influence of stone type, environmental conditions and pre-treatments on the effectiveness of the consolidation treatment. A comprehensive and rigorous testing programme was carried out to evaluate the short (12 weeks) and longer-term (4 years) effects. Stone samples were characterised before and after treatment using light and electron microscopy, sorptivity tests and a novel methodology employing drilling resistance to interrogate the near surface effects. Results show that for some of the stones, such as Clunch and Bath Stone, the positive effect of the treatment with nanolime is noticeable after 4 years since application. However, results for other stones such as Portland and magnesian limestone showed that the initial beneficial effect of the treatment is reduced after 4 years. Nanolime treatment of Ham Stone produced an unnoticeable effect on the continuous natural reduction of the drilling resistance of the specimen over time. The results presented
are of immense value to conservators as they provide essential guidance on the most appropriate repair approach. Impact to the conservation industry will be to avoid the use of nanolime on stones where there is no perceivable benefit, reducing the risk of adverse effects, including potential damage to buildings. In additional costs will be saved which might otherwise have been spent on ineffective treatments.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2673
Number of pages17
JournalMaterials
Volume12
Issue number17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Aug 2019

Keywords

  • nanolime
  • consolidation
  • drilling resistance
  • stone

Cite this

Effectiveness of Nanolime as a Stone Consolidant: A 4-Year Study of Six Common UK Limestones. / Tzavellos, Stelios; Pesce, Giovanni; Wu, Yu; Henry, Alison; Robson, Simon; Ball, Richard.

In: Materials, Vol. 12, No. 17, 2673, 22.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tzavellos, Stelios ; Pesce, Giovanni ; Wu, Yu ; Henry, Alison ; Robson, Simon ; Ball, Richard. / Effectiveness of Nanolime as a Stone Consolidant: A 4-Year Study of Six Common UK Limestones. In: Materials. 2019 ; Vol. 12, No. 17.
@article{49f9c366b92f4572b176807b2e647818,
title = "Effectiveness of Nanolime as a Stone Consolidant: A 4-Year Study of Six Common UK Limestones",
abstract = "Protecting stone buildings from weathering and decay is a major challenge in theconservation of built heritage. Most of the stone consolidants currently available are well suited to silicate stones, but are less compatible with limestone. In this paper we present for the first time the results over a 4-year period of various consolidation treatments carried out using nanolime on 6 of the most representative and significant stones used in historic buildings in the United Kingdom. Tests investigated the influence of stone type, environmental conditions and pre-treatments on the effectiveness of the consolidation treatment. A comprehensive and rigorous testing programme was carried out to evaluate the short (12 weeks) and longer-term (4 years) effects. Stone samples were characterised before and after treatment using light and electron microscopy, sorptivity tests and a novel methodology employing drilling resistance to interrogate the near surface effects. Results show that for some of the stones, such as Clunch and Bath Stone, the positive effect of the treatment with nanolime is noticeable after 4 years since application. However, results for other stones such as Portland and magnesian limestone showed that the initial beneficial effect of the treatment is reduced after 4 years. Nanolime treatment of Ham Stone produced an unnoticeable effect on the continuous natural reduction of the drilling resistance of the specimen over time. The results presentedare of immense value to conservators as they provide essential guidance on the most appropriate repair approach. Impact to the conservation industry will be to avoid the use of nanolime on stones where there is no perceivable benefit, reducing the risk of adverse effects, including potential damage to buildings. In additional costs will be saved which might otherwise have been spent on ineffective treatments.",
keywords = "nanolime, consolidation, drilling resistance, stone",
author = "Stelios Tzavellos and Giovanni Pesce and Yu Wu and Alison Henry and Simon Robson and Richard Ball",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "22",
doi = "10.3390/ma12172673",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Materials",
issn = "1996-1944",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of Nanolime as a Stone Consolidant: A 4-Year Study of Six Common UK Limestones

AU - Tzavellos, Stelios

AU - Pesce, Giovanni

AU - Wu, Yu

AU - Henry, Alison

AU - Robson, Simon

AU - Ball, Richard

PY - 2019/8/22

Y1 - 2019/8/22

N2 - Protecting stone buildings from weathering and decay is a major challenge in theconservation of built heritage. Most of the stone consolidants currently available are well suited to silicate stones, but are less compatible with limestone. In this paper we present for the first time the results over a 4-year period of various consolidation treatments carried out using nanolime on 6 of the most representative and significant stones used in historic buildings in the United Kingdom. Tests investigated the influence of stone type, environmental conditions and pre-treatments on the effectiveness of the consolidation treatment. A comprehensive and rigorous testing programme was carried out to evaluate the short (12 weeks) and longer-term (4 years) effects. Stone samples were characterised before and after treatment using light and electron microscopy, sorptivity tests and a novel methodology employing drilling resistance to interrogate the near surface effects. Results show that for some of the stones, such as Clunch and Bath Stone, the positive effect of the treatment with nanolime is noticeable after 4 years since application. However, results for other stones such as Portland and magnesian limestone showed that the initial beneficial effect of the treatment is reduced after 4 years. Nanolime treatment of Ham Stone produced an unnoticeable effect on the continuous natural reduction of the drilling resistance of the specimen over time. The results presentedare of immense value to conservators as they provide essential guidance on the most appropriate repair approach. Impact to the conservation industry will be to avoid the use of nanolime on stones where there is no perceivable benefit, reducing the risk of adverse effects, including potential damage to buildings. In additional costs will be saved which might otherwise have been spent on ineffective treatments.

AB - Protecting stone buildings from weathering and decay is a major challenge in theconservation of built heritage. Most of the stone consolidants currently available are well suited to silicate stones, but are less compatible with limestone. In this paper we present for the first time the results over a 4-year period of various consolidation treatments carried out using nanolime on 6 of the most representative and significant stones used in historic buildings in the United Kingdom. Tests investigated the influence of stone type, environmental conditions and pre-treatments on the effectiveness of the consolidation treatment. A comprehensive and rigorous testing programme was carried out to evaluate the short (12 weeks) and longer-term (4 years) effects. Stone samples were characterised before and after treatment using light and electron microscopy, sorptivity tests and a novel methodology employing drilling resistance to interrogate the near surface effects. Results show that for some of the stones, such as Clunch and Bath Stone, the positive effect of the treatment with nanolime is noticeable after 4 years since application. However, results for other stones such as Portland and magnesian limestone showed that the initial beneficial effect of the treatment is reduced after 4 years. Nanolime treatment of Ham Stone produced an unnoticeable effect on the continuous natural reduction of the drilling resistance of the specimen over time. The results presentedare of immense value to conservators as they provide essential guidance on the most appropriate repair approach. Impact to the conservation industry will be to avoid the use of nanolime on stones where there is no perceivable benefit, reducing the risk of adverse effects, including potential damage to buildings. In additional costs will be saved which might otherwise have been spent on ineffective treatments.

KW - nanolime

KW - consolidation

KW - drilling resistance

KW - stone

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071870323&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ma12172673

DO - 10.3390/ma12172673

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - Materials

JF - Materials

SN - 1996-1944

IS - 17

M1 - 2673

ER -