Education hubs and talent development: policymaking and implementation challenges

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The discourse on the internationalization of higher education emphasizes revenue generation while neglecting other diverse rationales pursued by governments and institutions. For countries that are seeking to venture into a knowledge economy or accrue greater competitive advantages under globalization, many policymakers view cross-border higher education as a platform for developing human talent. In this pursuit, education hubs stand out as large-scale initiatives supported by extensive planning and investment. By comparing the developments of Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong as education hubs, three distinct objectives are apparent: to develop local talent, to attract foreign talent, and to repatriate diasporic talent. Despite the attention directed at the recruitment of international students, developing local talent remains a fundamental goal among education hubs. Talent development includes manpower planning as well as more inclusive provisions that support the diverse interests among local students. On the other hand, education hubs do not share the goals of attracting foreign and repatriating diasporic talent. Contextual factors such as distinct political economies and ethnic sensitivities mediate the recruitment of external talent. Comparing the policy rhetoric of talent development against the realities of implementation reveals sharp misalignment in some cases. More importantly, the political inertia in Singapore and Hong Kong exerts a gravitational pull that is increasingly turning sentiments against some foreign talent.

LanguageEnglish
Pages807-823
Number of pages17
JournalHigher Education
Volume68
Issue number6
Early online date20 Mar 2014
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1 Dec 2014

Fingerprint

education
Singapore
Hong Kong
planning
knowledge economy
manpower
internationalization
Malaysia
political economy
revenue
rhetoric
student
globalization
discourse

Keywords

  • Asia
  • Cross border education
  • Education hubs
  • Human capital
  • Internationalization
  • Talent development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Education hubs and talent development : policymaking and implementation challenges. / Lee, Jack T.

In: Higher Education, Vol. 68, No. 6, 01.12.2014, p. 807-823.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8c7cfae949844a4595b0d0e3be386204,
title = "Education hubs and talent development: policymaking and implementation challenges",
abstract = "The discourse on the internationalization of higher education emphasizes revenue generation while neglecting other diverse rationales pursued by governments and institutions. For countries that are seeking to venture into a knowledge economy or accrue greater competitive advantages under globalization, many policymakers view cross-border higher education as a platform for developing human talent. In this pursuit, education hubs stand out as large-scale initiatives supported by extensive planning and investment. By comparing the developments of Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong as education hubs, three distinct objectives are apparent: to develop local talent, to attract foreign talent, and to repatriate diasporic talent. Despite the attention directed at the recruitment of international students, developing local talent remains a fundamental goal among education hubs. Talent development includes manpower planning as well as more inclusive provisions that support the diverse interests among local students. On the other hand, education hubs do not share the goals of attracting foreign and repatriating diasporic talent. Contextual factors such as distinct political economies and ethnic sensitivities mediate the recruitment of external talent. Comparing the policy rhetoric of talent development against the realities of implementation reveals sharp misalignment in some cases. More importantly, the political inertia in Singapore and Hong Kong exerts a gravitational pull that is increasingly turning sentiments against some foreign talent.",
keywords = "Asia, Cross border education, Education hubs, Human capital, Internationalization, Talent development",
author = "Lee, {Jack T.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10734-014-9745-x",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "807--823",
journal = "Higher Education",
issn = "0018-1560",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Education hubs and talent development

T2 - Higher Education

AU - Lee, Jack T.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - The discourse on the internationalization of higher education emphasizes revenue generation while neglecting other diverse rationales pursued by governments and institutions. For countries that are seeking to venture into a knowledge economy or accrue greater competitive advantages under globalization, many policymakers view cross-border higher education as a platform for developing human talent. In this pursuit, education hubs stand out as large-scale initiatives supported by extensive planning and investment. By comparing the developments of Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong as education hubs, three distinct objectives are apparent: to develop local talent, to attract foreign talent, and to repatriate diasporic talent. Despite the attention directed at the recruitment of international students, developing local talent remains a fundamental goal among education hubs. Talent development includes manpower planning as well as more inclusive provisions that support the diverse interests among local students. On the other hand, education hubs do not share the goals of attracting foreign and repatriating diasporic talent. Contextual factors such as distinct political economies and ethnic sensitivities mediate the recruitment of external talent. Comparing the policy rhetoric of talent development against the realities of implementation reveals sharp misalignment in some cases. More importantly, the political inertia in Singapore and Hong Kong exerts a gravitational pull that is increasingly turning sentiments against some foreign talent.

AB - The discourse on the internationalization of higher education emphasizes revenue generation while neglecting other diverse rationales pursued by governments and institutions. For countries that are seeking to venture into a knowledge economy or accrue greater competitive advantages under globalization, many policymakers view cross-border higher education as a platform for developing human talent. In this pursuit, education hubs stand out as large-scale initiatives supported by extensive planning and investment. By comparing the developments of Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong as education hubs, three distinct objectives are apparent: to develop local talent, to attract foreign talent, and to repatriate diasporic talent. Despite the attention directed at the recruitment of international students, developing local talent remains a fundamental goal among education hubs. Talent development includes manpower planning as well as more inclusive provisions that support the diverse interests among local students. On the other hand, education hubs do not share the goals of attracting foreign and repatriating diasporic talent. Contextual factors such as distinct political economies and ethnic sensitivities mediate the recruitment of external talent. Comparing the policy rhetoric of talent development against the realities of implementation reveals sharp misalignment in some cases. More importantly, the political inertia in Singapore and Hong Kong exerts a gravitational pull that is increasingly turning sentiments against some foreign talent.

KW - Asia

KW - Cross border education

KW - Education hubs

KW - Human capital

KW - Internationalization

KW - Talent development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896416434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10734-014-9745-x

DO - 10.1007/s10734-014-9745-x

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 807

EP - 823

JO - Higher Education

JF - Higher Education

SN - 0018-1560

IS - 6

ER -