4 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

The educational solutions put forward in the 2019 Conservative Government's Levelling Up programme privileged higher-level skills training delivered through further education, sidelining traditional university degrees, reflective of broader critiques levelled at the higher education sector in terms of the value for money of some degrees. It goes without saying that further education provides crucial opportunities for many people and our analyses of Linked Educational Outcomes Data (LEO) presented here support previous research on the returns to further education study. However, it also underlines the way returns are contingent upon race, gender, socio-economic status, subject of study and, most importantly, geographic location of employment. This is reflective of the broader spatial division of labour that is the characteristic of the UK economy, which the educational components of Levelling Up did little to disrupt. We argue that the Levelling Up programme maintained the status quo with economically less prosperous localities seen as ‘places of labour’–serving the controllers of capital in existing prosperous places, where the degree educated must continue to flock to take up the strategic control functions of economic production.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)514-530
JournalContemporary Social Science
Volume19
Issue number4
Early online date24 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2024

Funding

This work was supported by Research England.

Keywords

  • Further education
  • Levelling Up
  • spatial inequality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Education and the spatial division of labour: further education and prospects for 'levelling up''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this