Abstract
This study elicited the willingness to pay (WTP) for measures to control the release of intentionally added microplastics. Although microplastics accumulate in the marine environment and are practically unrecoverable, there is considerable scientific uncertainty about their environmental and health effects. This study used both a Choice Experiment (CE) and Contingent Valuation (CV) to evaluate where it was more beneficial to target restrictions at source or emissions. The CE investigated source-control in evaluating how respondents accept a trade-off between the price and performance of cosmetic products when reformulated to reduce the use of microplastics. Two CV tasks then estimated the benefits of research to resolve the uncertainty, and the benefits of upgrading Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTP) to retain more microplastics. The difference in the annual CV WTP; £53.24 for research and £73.71 respectively, suggests that respondents are willing to pay a substantial premium for the precautionary abatement of microplastics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Bath, UK |
| Publisher | Department of Economics, University of Bath |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Dec 2021 |
Publication series
| Name | Bath Economics Research Papers |
|---|---|
| Publisher | University of Bath |
| No. | 81/21 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 14 Life Below Water
Keywords
- Uncertainty
- Marine litter
- Micro pollutants
- Cost-benefit Analysis
- Stated preference
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Economic valuation of benefits from the proposed REACH restriction of intentionally added microplastics.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS