Economic losers, protestors, islamophobes or xenophobes? Predicting public support for a counter-Jihad movement

Matthew J. Goodwin, David Cutts, Laurence Janta-Lipinski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 4 Citations

Abstract

In recent years several European states have seen the emergence of ‘counter-Jihad’ movements, which in contrast to the established populist radical right eschew electoral politics and put stronger emphasis on mobilising opposition to Islam and Muslims. Despite attracting attention, counter-Jihad movements and the predictors of their support are under-researched. Drawing on a new survey and sample of self-identified supporters, this article investigates the predictors of public support for the English Defence League (EDL), the inaugural ‘defence league’ in Europe. Contrary to accounts that stress unemployment, apathy or single issues, it is found that support is concentrated among male workers, citizens with school-level education, who read tabloid newspapers and vote for right-wing parties, but who are not more likely to be unemployed, in social housing, have no qualifications or be politically apathetic. Foremost, regression analysis confirms that the strongest predictor of their support is xenophobic hostility toward Muslims, and ethnic minorities more generally.
LanguageEnglish
Pages4-26
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume64
Issue number1
Early online date11 Dec 2015
DOIs
StatusPublished - Mar 2016

Fingerprint

public support
Muslim
apathy
social housing
national minority
qualification
Islam
economics
unemployment
voter
newspaper
regression analysis
opposition
citizen
worker
politics
school
education
jihad

Cite this

Economic losers, protestors, islamophobes or xenophobes? Predicting public support for a counter-Jihad movement. / Goodwin, Matthew J.; Cutts, David; Janta-Lipinski, Laurence.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 64, No. 1, 03.2016, p. 4-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goodwin, Matthew J. ; Cutts, David ; Janta-Lipinski, Laurence. / Economic losers, protestors, islamophobes or xenophobes? Predicting public support for a counter-Jihad movement. In: Political Studies. 2016 ; Vol. 64, No. 1. pp. 4-26.
@article{e62e42a501ef41e0acc0bb5a31e93561,
title = "Economic losers, protestors, islamophobes or xenophobes? Predicting public support for a counter-Jihad movement",
abstract = "In recent years several European states have seen the emergence of ‘counter-Jihad’ movements, which in contrast to the established populist radical right eschew electoral politics and put stronger emphasis on mobilising opposition to Islam and Muslims. Despite attracting attention, counter-Jihad movements and the predictors of their support are under-researched. Drawing on a new survey and sample of self-identified supporters, this article investigates the predictors of public support for the English Defence League (EDL), the inaugural ‘defence league’ in Europe. Contrary to accounts that stress unemployment, apathy or single issues, it is found that support is concentrated among male workers, citizens with school-level education, who read tabloid newspapers and vote for right-wing parties, but who are not more likely to be unemployed, in social housing, have no qualifications or be politically apathetic. Foremost, regression analysis confirms that the strongest predictor of their support is xenophobic hostility toward Muslims, and ethnic minorities more generally.",
author = "Goodwin, {Matthew J.} and David Cutts and Laurence Janta-Lipinski",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9248.12159",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "4--26",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic losers, protestors, islamophobes or xenophobes? Predicting public support for a counter-Jihad movement

AU - Goodwin, Matthew J.

AU - Cutts, David

AU - Janta-Lipinski, Laurence

PY - 2016/3

Y1 - 2016/3

N2 - In recent years several European states have seen the emergence of ‘counter-Jihad’ movements, which in contrast to the established populist radical right eschew electoral politics and put stronger emphasis on mobilising opposition to Islam and Muslims. Despite attracting attention, counter-Jihad movements and the predictors of their support are under-researched. Drawing on a new survey and sample of self-identified supporters, this article investigates the predictors of public support for the English Defence League (EDL), the inaugural ‘defence league’ in Europe. Contrary to accounts that stress unemployment, apathy or single issues, it is found that support is concentrated among male workers, citizens with school-level education, who read tabloid newspapers and vote for right-wing parties, but who are not more likely to be unemployed, in social housing, have no qualifications or be politically apathetic. Foremost, regression analysis confirms that the strongest predictor of their support is xenophobic hostility toward Muslims, and ethnic minorities more generally.

AB - In recent years several European states have seen the emergence of ‘counter-Jihad’ movements, which in contrast to the established populist radical right eschew electoral politics and put stronger emphasis on mobilising opposition to Islam and Muslims. Despite attracting attention, counter-Jihad movements and the predictors of their support are under-researched. Drawing on a new survey and sample of self-identified supporters, this article investigates the predictors of public support for the English Defence League (EDL), the inaugural ‘defence league’ in Europe. Contrary to accounts that stress unemployment, apathy or single issues, it is found that support is concentrated among male workers, citizens with school-level education, who read tabloid newspapers and vote for right-wing parties, but who are not more likely to be unemployed, in social housing, have no qualifications or be politically apathetic. Foremost, regression analysis confirms that the strongest predictor of their support is xenophobic hostility toward Muslims, and ethnic minorities more generally.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12159

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9248.12159

DO - 10.1111/1467-9248.12159

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 4

EP - 26

JO - Political Studies

T2 - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 1

ER -