Economic impact of reduced mortality due to increased cycling

H. Rutter, N. Cavill, F. Racioppi, H. Dinsdale, P. Oja, S. Kahlmeier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 18 Citations

Abstract

Increasing regular physical activity is a key public health goal. One strategy is to change the physical environment to encourage walking and cycling, requiring partnerships with the transport and urban planning sectors. Economic evaluation is an important factor in the decision to fund any new transport scheme, but techniques for assessing the economic value of the health benefits of cycling and walking have tended to be less sophisticated than the approaches used for assessing other benefits. This study aimed to produce a practical tool for estimating the economic impact of reduced mortality due to increased cycling. The tool was intended to be transparent, easy to use, reliable, and based on conservative assumptions and default values, which can be used in the absence of local data. It addressed the question: For a given volume of cycling within a defined population, what is the economic value of the health benefits? The authors used published estimates of relative risk of all-cause mortality among regular cyclists and applied these to levels of cycling defined by the user to produce an estimate of the number of deaths potentially averted because of regular cycling. The tool then calculates the economic value of the deaths averted using the "value of a statistical life." The outputs of the tool support decision making on cycle infrastructure or policies, or can be used as part of an integrated economic appraisal. The tool's unique contribution is that it takes a public health approach to a transport problem, addresses it in epidemiologic terms, and places the results back into the transport context. Examples of its use include its adoption by the English and Swedish departments of transport as the recommended methodologic approach for estimating the health impact of walking and cycling.
LanguageEnglish
Pages89-92
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatusPublished - 17 Dec 2012

Keywords

  • Bicycling/economics/*physiology Decision Making Humans *Models, Economic Mortality Motor Activity/*physiology Public Health/economics Public Policy Reproducibility of Results Risk Transportation/economics

Cite this

Economic impact of reduced mortality due to increased cycling. / Rutter, H.; Cavill, N.; Racioppi, F.; Dinsdale, H.; Oja, P.; Kahlmeier, S.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 44, No. 1, 17.12.2012, p. 89-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rutter, H. ; Cavill, N. ; Racioppi, F. ; Dinsdale, H. ; Oja, P. ; Kahlmeier, S. / Economic impact of reduced mortality due to increased cycling. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 89-92.
@article{17973747e3df45baba92da53be4b93d4,
title = "Economic impact of reduced mortality due to increased cycling",
abstract = "Increasing regular physical activity is a key public health goal. One strategy is to change the physical environment to encourage walking and cycling, requiring partnerships with the transport and urban planning sectors. Economic evaluation is an important factor in the decision to fund any new transport scheme, but techniques for assessing the economic value of the health benefits of cycling and walking have tended to be less sophisticated than the approaches used for assessing other benefits. This study aimed to produce a practical tool for estimating the economic impact of reduced mortality due to increased cycling. The tool was intended to be transparent, easy to use, reliable, and based on conservative assumptions and default values, which can be used in the absence of local data. It addressed the question: For a given volume of cycling within a defined population, what is the economic value of the health benefits? The authors used published estimates of relative risk of all-cause mortality among regular cyclists and applied these to levels of cycling defined by the user to produce an estimate of the number of deaths potentially averted because of regular cycling. The tool then calculates the economic value of the deaths averted using the {"}value of a statistical life.{"} The outputs of the tool support decision making on cycle infrastructure or policies, or can be used as part of an integrated economic appraisal. The tool's unique contribution is that it takes a public health approach to a transport problem, addresses it in epidemiologic terms, and places the results back into the transport context. Examples of its use include its adoption by the English and Swedish departments of transport as the recommended methodologic approach for estimating the health impact of walking and cycling.",
keywords = "Bicycling/economics/*physiology Decision Making Humans *Models, Economic Mortality Motor Activity/*physiology Public Health/economics Public Policy Reproducibility of Results Risk Transportation/economics",
author = "H. Rutter and N. Cavill and F. Racioppi and H. Dinsdale and P. Oja and S. Kahlmeier",
note = "Rutter, Harry Cavill, Nick Racioppi, Francesca Dinsdale, Hywell Oja, Pekka Kahlmeier, Sonja eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Netherlands 2012/12/21 06:00 Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jan;44(1):89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.053.",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.053",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "89--92",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic impact of reduced mortality due to increased cycling

AU - Rutter, H.

AU - Cavill, N.

AU - Racioppi, F.

AU - Dinsdale, H.

AU - Oja, P.

AU - Kahlmeier, S.

N1 - Rutter, Harry Cavill, Nick Racioppi, Francesca Dinsdale, Hywell Oja, Pekka Kahlmeier, Sonja eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Netherlands 2012/12/21 06:00 Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jan;44(1):89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.053.

PY - 2012/12/17

Y1 - 2012/12/17

N2 - Increasing regular physical activity is a key public health goal. One strategy is to change the physical environment to encourage walking and cycling, requiring partnerships with the transport and urban planning sectors. Economic evaluation is an important factor in the decision to fund any new transport scheme, but techniques for assessing the economic value of the health benefits of cycling and walking have tended to be less sophisticated than the approaches used for assessing other benefits. This study aimed to produce a practical tool for estimating the economic impact of reduced mortality due to increased cycling. The tool was intended to be transparent, easy to use, reliable, and based on conservative assumptions and default values, which can be used in the absence of local data. It addressed the question: For a given volume of cycling within a defined population, what is the economic value of the health benefits? The authors used published estimates of relative risk of all-cause mortality among regular cyclists and applied these to levels of cycling defined by the user to produce an estimate of the number of deaths potentially averted because of regular cycling. The tool then calculates the economic value of the deaths averted using the "value of a statistical life." The outputs of the tool support decision making on cycle infrastructure or policies, or can be used as part of an integrated economic appraisal. The tool's unique contribution is that it takes a public health approach to a transport problem, addresses it in epidemiologic terms, and places the results back into the transport context. Examples of its use include its adoption by the English and Swedish departments of transport as the recommended methodologic approach for estimating the health impact of walking and cycling.

AB - Increasing regular physical activity is a key public health goal. One strategy is to change the physical environment to encourage walking and cycling, requiring partnerships with the transport and urban planning sectors. Economic evaluation is an important factor in the decision to fund any new transport scheme, but techniques for assessing the economic value of the health benefits of cycling and walking have tended to be less sophisticated than the approaches used for assessing other benefits. This study aimed to produce a practical tool for estimating the economic impact of reduced mortality due to increased cycling. The tool was intended to be transparent, easy to use, reliable, and based on conservative assumptions and default values, which can be used in the absence of local data. It addressed the question: For a given volume of cycling within a defined population, what is the economic value of the health benefits? The authors used published estimates of relative risk of all-cause mortality among regular cyclists and applied these to levels of cycling defined by the user to produce an estimate of the number of deaths potentially averted because of regular cycling. The tool then calculates the economic value of the deaths averted using the "value of a statistical life." The outputs of the tool support decision making on cycle infrastructure or policies, or can be used as part of an integrated economic appraisal. The tool's unique contribution is that it takes a public health approach to a transport problem, addresses it in epidemiologic terms, and places the results back into the transport context. Examples of its use include its adoption by the English and Swedish departments of transport as the recommended methodologic approach for estimating the health impact of walking and cycling.

KW - Bicycling/economics/physiology Decision Making Humans Models, Economic Mortality Motor Activity/physiology Public Health/economics Public Policy Reproducibility of Results Risk Transportation/economics

U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.053

DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.053

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 89

EP - 92

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

T2 - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 1

ER -