Earnings management, audit adjustments, and the financing of corporate acquisitions: Evidence from China

Clive Lennox, Zi-Tian Wang, Xi Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Acquirers are motivated to overstate earnings prior to stock-financed acquisitions. We hypothesize that audits help to detect and correct such overstatements. We test this using a difference-in-differences design, which compares audit adjustments to earnings for stock-financed and cash-financed acquirers before versus after the acquisitions. Consistent with our hypothesis, we find larger downward adjustments in the audits immediately before stock-financed acquisitions. Further analysis of regulatory sanctions suggests the downward adjustments are in fact warranted, rather than auditors being overly conservative. Moreover, modifications in audit reports suggest that downward adjustments do not correct all of the reporting irregularities in audited financial statements.

LanguageEnglish
Pages21-40
JournalJournal of Accounting and Economics
Early online date20 Nov 2017
DOIs
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Audit adjustments
China
Corporate acquisitions
Financing
Earnings management
Audit
Cash
Audit reports
Sanctions
Financial statements
Difference-in-differences
Auditors

Keywords

  • Adjustments
  • Audit
  • Earnings management
  • Stock-financed acquisitions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Earnings management, audit adjustments, and the financing of corporate acquisitions : Evidence from China. / Lennox, Clive; Wang, Zi-Tian; Wu, Xi.

In: Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20.11.2017, p. 21-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{626c47bf3fdc42b290ddfb65e4d9892b,
title = "Earnings management, audit adjustments, and the financing of corporate acquisitions: Evidence from China",
abstract = "Acquirers are motivated to overstate earnings prior to stock-financed acquisitions. We hypothesize that audits help to detect and correct such overstatements. We test this using a difference-in-differences design, which compares audit adjustments to earnings for stock-financed and cash-financed acquirers before versus after the acquisitions. Consistent with our hypothesis, we find larger downward adjustments in the audits immediately before stock-financed acquisitions. Further analysis of regulatory sanctions suggests the downward adjustments are in fact warranted, rather than auditors being overly conservative. Moreover, modifications in audit reports suggest that downward adjustments do not correct all of the reporting irregularities in audited financial statements.",
keywords = "Adjustments, Audit, Earnings management, Stock-financed acquisitions",
author = "Clive Lennox and Zi-Tian Wang and Xi Wu",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.11.011",
language = "English",
pages = "21--40",
journal = "Journal of Accounting and Economics",
issn = "0165-4101",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Earnings management, audit adjustments, and the financing of corporate acquisitions

T2 - Journal of Accounting and Economics

AU - Lennox,Clive

AU - Wang,Zi-Tian

AU - Wu,Xi

PY - 2017/11/20

Y1 - 2017/11/20

N2 - Acquirers are motivated to overstate earnings prior to stock-financed acquisitions. We hypothesize that audits help to detect and correct such overstatements. We test this using a difference-in-differences design, which compares audit adjustments to earnings for stock-financed and cash-financed acquirers before versus after the acquisitions. Consistent with our hypothesis, we find larger downward adjustments in the audits immediately before stock-financed acquisitions. Further analysis of regulatory sanctions suggests the downward adjustments are in fact warranted, rather than auditors being overly conservative. Moreover, modifications in audit reports suggest that downward adjustments do not correct all of the reporting irregularities in audited financial statements.

AB - Acquirers are motivated to overstate earnings prior to stock-financed acquisitions. We hypothesize that audits help to detect and correct such overstatements. We test this using a difference-in-differences design, which compares audit adjustments to earnings for stock-financed and cash-financed acquirers before versus after the acquisitions. Consistent with our hypothesis, we find larger downward adjustments in the audits immediately before stock-financed acquisitions. Further analysis of regulatory sanctions suggests the downward adjustments are in fact warranted, rather than auditors being overly conservative. Moreover, modifications in audit reports suggest that downward adjustments do not correct all of the reporting irregularities in audited financial statements.

KW - Adjustments

KW - Audit

KW - Earnings management

KW - Stock-financed acquisitions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034826172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.11.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.11.011

M3 - Article

SP - 21

EP - 40

JO - Journal of Accounting and Economics

JF - Journal of Accounting and Economics

SN - 0165-4101

ER -