Does size matter in predicting SMEs failure?

Jairaj Gupta, Mariachiara Barzotto, Amir Khorasgani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study acknowledges the diversity between micro, small, and medium‐sized firms while predicting bankruptcy and financial distress of the United States small and medium‐sized enterprises. Empirical findings suggest that survival (failure) probability increases (decreases) with increasing firm size and firms in different size categories have varying determinants of bankruptcy, whereas factors affecting their financial distress are mostly invariant. Magnitude of significant covariates changes across the size categories of both bankrupt and financially distressed firms. Further, operating cash flow information does not add any marginal increment in prediction performance of multivariate hazard models above baseline models developed using information from income statements and balance sheets. This result holds for failure likelihood of small and medium‐sized enterprises and their respective size categories.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)571-605
Number of pages35
JournalInternational Journal of Finance and Economics
Volume23
Issue number4
Early online date15 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

Cite this

Does size matter in predicting SMEs failure? / Gupta, Jairaj; Barzotto, Mariachiara; Khorasgani, Amir.

In: International Journal of Finance and Economics, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.10.2018, p. 571-605.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gupta, Jairaj ; Barzotto, Mariachiara ; Khorasgani, Amir. / Does size matter in predicting SMEs failure?. In: International Journal of Finance and Economics. 2018 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 571-605.
@article{6131df9d7825475680d3381d1d6155fb,
title = "Does size matter in predicting SMEs failure?",
abstract = "This study acknowledges the diversity between micro, small, and medium‐sized firms while predicting bankruptcy and financial distress of the United States small and medium‐sized enterprises. Empirical findings suggest that survival (failure) probability increases (decreases) with increasing firm size and firms in different size categories have varying determinants of bankruptcy, whereas factors affecting their financial distress are mostly invariant. Magnitude of significant covariates changes across the size categories of both bankrupt and financially distressed firms. Further, operating cash flow information does not add any marginal increment in prediction performance of multivariate hazard models above baseline models developed using information from income statements and balance sheets. This result holds for failure likelihood of small and medium‐sized enterprises and their respective size categories.",
author = "Jairaj Gupta and Mariachiara Barzotto and Amir Khorasgani",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ijfe.1638",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "571--605",
journal = "International Journal of Finance and Economics",
issn = "1076-9307",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does size matter in predicting SMEs failure?

AU - Gupta, Jairaj

AU - Barzotto, Mariachiara

AU - Khorasgani, Amir

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - This study acknowledges the diversity between micro, small, and medium‐sized firms while predicting bankruptcy and financial distress of the United States small and medium‐sized enterprises. Empirical findings suggest that survival (failure) probability increases (decreases) with increasing firm size and firms in different size categories have varying determinants of bankruptcy, whereas factors affecting their financial distress are mostly invariant. Magnitude of significant covariates changes across the size categories of both bankrupt and financially distressed firms. Further, operating cash flow information does not add any marginal increment in prediction performance of multivariate hazard models above baseline models developed using information from income statements and balance sheets. This result holds for failure likelihood of small and medium‐sized enterprises and their respective size categories.

AB - This study acknowledges the diversity between micro, small, and medium‐sized firms while predicting bankruptcy and financial distress of the United States small and medium‐sized enterprises. Empirical findings suggest that survival (failure) probability increases (decreases) with increasing firm size and firms in different size categories have varying determinants of bankruptcy, whereas factors affecting their financial distress are mostly invariant. Magnitude of significant covariates changes across the size categories of both bankrupt and financially distressed firms. Further, operating cash flow information does not add any marginal increment in prediction performance of multivariate hazard models above baseline models developed using information from income statements and balance sheets. This result holds for failure likelihood of small and medium‐sized enterprises and their respective size categories.

U2 - 10.1002/ijfe.1638

DO - 10.1002/ijfe.1638

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 571

EP - 605

JO - International Journal of Finance and Economics

JF - International Journal of Finance and Economics

SN - 1076-9307

IS - 4

ER -