@techreport{fa57d9a273d642689843bf49199ef266,
title = "Does Patient Health Behaviour respond to Doctor{\textquoteright}s Effort?",
abstract = "Incentive pay systems have been introduced in public sectors such as education and healthcare. In these organisations where the outcome (health or education) is a joint product between different agents, it is unclear what the effects of these incentives are onto the behaviour of untargeted agents. We focus on patient health as a joint product of patient effort, through lifestyle and behaviour, and doctor effort, through diagnosis and treatment. Patient response to doctor effort is a priori ambiguous and depends on the degree of complementarity or substitution between doctor and patient effort. We use data on the physical activity, drinking and smoking behaviours of over 2,000 patients aged over 50 with cardiovascular diseases in England. Through a new data linkage and an instrumental variable approach, we test whether changes in doctors{\textquoteright} treatment efforts triggered by changes in their payment system between 2004 and 2006 had an impact on patient behaviour. Doctors working in primary care practices increased the proportion of patients with controlled disease from 76% to 83% in response to the payment change. Patients responded by reducing the frequency of drinking alcohol and their cigarette consumption. This suggests that patient efforts are complements to doctor effort. The results have implications for the effectiveness of pay-for-performance schemes which encourage higher doctor effort, and the design of such incentive schemes.",
author = "Eleonora Fichera and James Banks and Luigi Siciliani and Matt Sutton",
note = "Working Paper no. 62/17",
year = "2017",
month = mar,
day = "7",
language = "English",
series = "Bath Economics Research Working Papers",
publisher = "Department of Economics, University of Bath",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Economics, University of Bath",
}