Does parental support moderate the effect of children’s motivation and self-efficacy on physical activity and sedentary behaviour?

Fiona Gillison, Martyn Standage, Sean Cumming, Julia Zakrzewski-Fruer, Peter Rouse, Peter T Katzmarzyk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives: 1) To test whether parental support moderates the direct effects of children’s motivation and self-efficacy on objectively measured moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time. 2) To explore differences in the relationships between boys and girls.
Design: Cross-sectional observational study.
Method: Data were collected from 430 9-11 year old UK children and their parents; parents self-reported on the support they provided to their children to be active (through providing transport, encouragement, watching, or taking part with their child), and children self-reported their motivation and self-efficacy towards exercise. MVPA and sedentary time were measured using accelerometers.
Results: Both parent- and child-level factors were largely positively associated with children’s MVPA and negatively related to sedentary time. There was no evidence of a moderation effect of parental support on MVPA or sedentary time in boys. Parental provision of transport moderated the effect of girls’ motivation on week-day MVPA; more motivated girls were less active when transport was provided. Transport and exercising with one’s child moderated the effect of motivation and self-efficacy on girls’ sedentary time at weekends; more motivated girls, and those with higher self-efficacy were less sedentary when parents provided more frequent transportation or took part in physical activity with them.
Conclusions: The results largely supported a model of the independent effects of parent and child determinants for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, but there was evidence that some types of parent support can moderate sedentary time in girls. Further research is needed to explore the causal pathways between the observed cross-sectional results.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-161
JournalPsychology of Sport and Exercise
Volume32
Early online date13 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Self Efficacy
Motivation
Exercise
Parents
Active Biological Transport
Observational Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Research

Cite this

@article{804741aa47db46d7b40fa9bf95628564,
title = "Does parental support moderate the effect of children’s motivation and self-efficacy on physical activity and sedentary behaviour?",
abstract = "Objectives: 1) To test whether parental support moderates the direct effects of children’s motivation and self-efficacy on objectively measured moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time. 2) To explore differences in the relationships between boys and girls.Design: Cross-sectional observational study.Method: Data were collected from 430 9-11 year old UK children and their parents; parents self-reported on the support they provided to their children to be active (through providing transport, encouragement, watching, or taking part with their child), and children self-reported their motivation and self-efficacy towards exercise. MVPA and sedentary time were measured using accelerometers.Results: Both parent- and child-level factors were largely positively associated with children’s MVPA and negatively related to sedentary time. There was no evidence of a moderation effect of parental support on MVPA or sedentary time in boys. Parental provision of transport moderated the effect of girls’ motivation on week-day MVPA; more motivated girls were less active when transport was provided. Transport and exercising with one’s child moderated the effect of motivation and self-efficacy on girls’ sedentary time at weekends; more motivated girls, and those with higher self-efficacy were less sedentary when parents provided more frequent transportation or took part in physical activity with them.Conclusions: The results largely supported a model of the independent effects of parent and child determinants for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, but there was evidence that some types of parent support can moderate sedentary time in girls. Further research is needed to explore the causal pathways between the observed cross-sectional results.",
author = "Fiona Gillison and Martyn Standage and Sean Cumming and Julia Zakrzewski-Fruer and Peter Rouse and Katzmarzyk, {Peter T}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.07.004",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "153--161",
journal = "Psychology of Sport and Exercise",
issn = "1469-0292",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does parental support moderate the effect of children’s motivation and self-efficacy on physical activity and sedentary behaviour?

AU - Gillison, Fiona

AU - Standage, Martyn

AU - Cumming, Sean

AU - Zakrzewski-Fruer, Julia

AU - Rouse, Peter

AU - Katzmarzyk, Peter T

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - Objectives: 1) To test whether parental support moderates the direct effects of children’s motivation and self-efficacy on objectively measured moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time. 2) To explore differences in the relationships between boys and girls.Design: Cross-sectional observational study.Method: Data were collected from 430 9-11 year old UK children and their parents; parents self-reported on the support they provided to their children to be active (through providing transport, encouragement, watching, or taking part with their child), and children self-reported their motivation and self-efficacy towards exercise. MVPA and sedentary time were measured using accelerometers.Results: Both parent- and child-level factors were largely positively associated with children’s MVPA and negatively related to sedentary time. There was no evidence of a moderation effect of parental support on MVPA or sedentary time in boys. Parental provision of transport moderated the effect of girls’ motivation on week-day MVPA; more motivated girls were less active when transport was provided. Transport and exercising with one’s child moderated the effect of motivation and self-efficacy on girls’ sedentary time at weekends; more motivated girls, and those with higher self-efficacy were less sedentary when parents provided more frequent transportation or took part in physical activity with them.Conclusions: The results largely supported a model of the independent effects of parent and child determinants for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, but there was evidence that some types of parent support can moderate sedentary time in girls. Further research is needed to explore the causal pathways between the observed cross-sectional results.

AB - Objectives: 1) To test whether parental support moderates the direct effects of children’s motivation and self-efficacy on objectively measured moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time. 2) To explore differences in the relationships between boys and girls.Design: Cross-sectional observational study.Method: Data were collected from 430 9-11 year old UK children and their parents; parents self-reported on the support they provided to their children to be active (through providing transport, encouragement, watching, or taking part with their child), and children self-reported their motivation and self-efficacy towards exercise. MVPA and sedentary time were measured using accelerometers.Results: Both parent- and child-level factors were largely positively associated with children’s MVPA and negatively related to sedentary time. There was no evidence of a moderation effect of parental support on MVPA or sedentary time in boys. Parental provision of transport moderated the effect of girls’ motivation on week-day MVPA; more motivated girls were less active when transport was provided. Transport and exercising with one’s child moderated the effect of motivation and self-efficacy on girls’ sedentary time at weekends; more motivated girls, and those with higher self-efficacy were less sedentary when parents provided more frequent transportation or took part in physical activity with them.Conclusions: The results largely supported a model of the independent effects of parent and child determinants for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, but there was evidence that some types of parent support can moderate sedentary time in girls. Further research is needed to explore the causal pathways between the observed cross-sectional results.

UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.07.004

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.07.004

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 153

EP - 161

JO - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

JF - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

SN - 1469-0292

ER -