Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tobacco corporation Philip Morris International launched the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World (FSFW), a purportedly independent scientific organisation, in 2017. We aimed to systematically investigate FSFW's activities and outputs, comparing these with previous industry attempts to influence science, as identified in the recently developed typology of corporate influence on science, the Science for Profit Model (SPM).
DESIGN: We prospectively collected data on FSFW over a 4-year period, 2017-2021, and used document analysis to assess whether FSFW's activities mirror practices tobacco and other industries have historically used to shape science in their own interests. We used the SPM as an analytical framework, working deductively to search for use of the strategies it identifies, and inductively to search for any additional strategies.
RESULTS: Marked similarities between FSFW's practices and previous corporate attempts to influence science were observed, including: producing tobacco industry-friendly research and opinion; obscuring industry involvement in science; funding third parties which denigrate science and scientists that may threaten industry profitability; and promoting tobacco industry credibility.
CONCLUSIONS: Our paper identifies FSFW as a new vehicle for agnogenesis, indicating that, over 70 years since the tobacco industry began to manipulate science, efforts to protect science from its interference remain inadequate. This, combined with growing evidence that other industries are engaging in similar practices, illustrates the urgent need to develop more robust systems to protect scientific integrity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 525-534 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Tobacco Control |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 3 May 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 20 Jun 2024 |
Data Availability Statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplemental information.Acknowledgements
We thank other members of the Tobacco Control Research Group at the University of Bath, the STOP team and the wider tobacco control community for sharing data with us. We are also grateful for the constructive feedback provided by the four reviewers.Keywords
- Surveillance and monitoring
- Tobacco industry
- Tobacco industry documents
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science)
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health