Do natural experiments of changes in neighborhood built environment impact physical activity and diet? A systematic review

Freya Macmillan, Emma S. George, Xiaoqi Feng, Dafna Merom, Andrew Bennie, Amelia Cook, Taren Sanders, Genevieve Dwyer, Bonnie Pang, Justin M. Guagliano, Gregory S. Kolt, Thomas Astell-Burt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

62 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Physical activity and diet are major modifiable risk factors for chronic disease and have been shown to be associated with neighborhood built environment. Systematic review evidence from longitudinal studies on the impact of changing the built environment on physical activity and diet is currently lacking. A systematic review of natural experiments of neighborhood built environment was conducted. The aims of this systematic review were to summarize study characteristics, study quality, and impact of changes in neighborhood built environment on physical activity and diet outcomes among residents. Natural experiments of neighborhood built environment change, exploring longitudinal impacts on physical activity and/or diet in residents, were included. From five electronic databases, 2084 references were identified. A narrative synthesis was conducted, considering results in relation to study quality. Nineteen papers, reporting on 15 different exposures met inclusion criteria. Four studies included a comparison group and 11 were pre-post/longitudinal studies without a comparison group. Studies reported on the impact of redeveloping or introducing cycle and/or walking trails (n = 5), rail stops/lines (n = 4), supermarkets and farmers’ markets (n = 4) and park and green space (n = 2). Eight/15 studies reported at least one beneficial change in physical activity, diet or another associated health outcome. Due to limitations in study design and reporting, as well as the wide array of outcome measures reported, drawing conclusions to inform policy was challenging. Future research should consider a consistent approach to measure the same outcomes (e.g., using measurement methods that collect comparable physical activity and diet outcome data), to allow for pooled analyses. Additionally, including comparison groups wherever possible and ensuring high quality reporting is essential.

Original languageEnglish
Article number217
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jan 2018

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgments: We thank Andrew Page, Brendon Hyndman, Mel Dunshea and Fran Moran for providing assistance with the initial screening of a sub-set of titles and abstracts and/or rating of risk of bias in a sub-set of included studies. Thomas Astell-Burt is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Boosting Dementia Research Leadership Fellowship (#1140317). Xiaoqi Feng is supported by a National Heart Foundation of Australia Fellowship (#100948). Thomas Astell-Burt and Xiaoqi Feng are also jointly supported by an NHMRC Project Grant (#1101065) and Hort Innovation Limited with co-investment from the University of Wollongong (UOW) Faculty of Social Sciences, the UOW Global Challenges initiative and the Australian Government (project number #GC15005).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Built environment
  • Diet
  • Longitudinal
  • Natural experiment
  • Neighborhood
  • Physical activity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do natural experiments of changes in neighborhood built environment impact physical activity and diet? A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this