Do high technology acquirers become more innovative?

Panos Desyllas, Alan Hughes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing on organizational, managerial and financial theories, we explore whether acquirers become more innovative and the factors that can enhance their absorptive and financial capacity to benefit from acquisition. Over a 3-year post-acquisition window, our sample of 2624 high technology US acquisitions records early reverses followed by positive R&D-intensity changes and insignificant R&D productivity changes. Controlling for acquisition endogeneity and deal-specific effects, significant acquirer characteristic effects emerge. In related acquisitions, a large knowledge base tends to increase R&D productivity, consistent with an enhanced capacity to select and absorb targets. In unrelated acquisitions, however, this relationship becomes increasingly negative as knowledge base concentration increases, consistent with arguments for an impaired peripheral vision and core rigidities. High leverage levels raise R&D productivity gains, consistent with enhanced monitoring induced efficiency. However, high leverage growth reduces R&D-intensity, consistent with increased financial constraints and short-termism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1105-1121
Number of pages17
JournalResearch Policy
Volume39
Issue number8
Early online date17 Jun 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Productivity
Rigidity
Monitoring
High technology
Leverage
Knowledge base

Cite this

Do high technology acquirers become more innovative? / Desyllas, Panos; Hughes, Alan.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 39, No. 8, 10.2010, p. 1105-1121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Desyllas, Panos ; Hughes, Alan. / Do high technology acquirers become more innovative?. In: Research Policy. 2010 ; Vol. 39, No. 8. pp. 1105-1121.
@article{b9bdc1e62d964733b677fb9fb2a61627,
title = "Do high technology acquirers become more innovative?",
abstract = "Drawing on organizational, managerial and financial theories, we explore whether acquirers become more innovative and the factors that can enhance their absorptive and financial capacity to benefit from acquisition. Over a 3-year post-acquisition window, our sample of 2624 high technology US acquisitions records early reverses followed by positive R&D-intensity changes and insignificant R&D productivity changes. Controlling for acquisition endogeneity and deal-specific effects, significant acquirer characteristic effects emerge. In related acquisitions, a large knowledge base tends to increase R&D productivity, consistent with an enhanced capacity to select and absorb targets. In unrelated acquisitions, however, this relationship becomes increasingly negative as knowledge base concentration increases, consistent with arguments for an impaired peripheral vision and core rigidities. High leverage levels raise R&D productivity gains, consistent with enhanced monitoring induced efficiency. However, high leverage growth reduces R&D-intensity, consistent with increased financial constraints and short-termism.",
author = "Panos Desyllas and Alan Hughes",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.005",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1105--1121",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do high technology acquirers become more innovative?

AU - Desyllas, Panos

AU - Hughes, Alan

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Drawing on organizational, managerial and financial theories, we explore whether acquirers become more innovative and the factors that can enhance their absorptive and financial capacity to benefit from acquisition. Over a 3-year post-acquisition window, our sample of 2624 high technology US acquisitions records early reverses followed by positive R&D-intensity changes and insignificant R&D productivity changes. Controlling for acquisition endogeneity and deal-specific effects, significant acquirer characteristic effects emerge. In related acquisitions, a large knowledge base tends to increase R&D productivity, consistent with an enhanced capacity to select and absorb targets. In unrelated acquisitions, however, this relationship becomes increasingly negative as knowledge base concentration increases, consistent with arguments for an impaired peripheral vision and core rigidities. High leverage levels raise R&D productivity gains, consistent with enhanced monitoring induced efficiency. However, high leverage growth reduces R&D-intensity, consistent with increased financial constraints and short-termism.

AB - Drawing on organizational, managerial and financial theories, we explore whether acquirers become more innovative and the factors that can enhance their absorptive and financial capacity to benefit from acquisition. Over a 3-year post-acquisition window, our sample of 2624 high technology US acquisitions records early reverses followed by positive R&D-intensity changes and insignificant R&D productivity changes. Controlling for acquisition endogeneity and deal-specific effects, significant acquirer characteristic effects emerge. In related acquisitions, a large knowledge base tends to increase R&D productivity, consistent with an enhanced capacity to select and absorb targets. In unrelated acquisitions, however, this relationship becomes increasingly negative as knowledge base concentration increases, consistent with arguments for an impaired peripheral vision and core rigidities. High leverage levels raise R&D productivity gains, consistent with enhanced monitoring induced efficiency. However, high leverage growth reduces R&D-intensity, consistent with increased financial constraints and short-termism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955414963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.005

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.005

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 1105

EP - 1121

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 8

ER -