Do climate change policies promote or conflict with subjective wellbeing

A case study of Suzhou, China

Miaomiao Liu, Yining Huang, Rosemary Hiscock, Qin Li, Jun Bi, Patrick L. Kinney, Clive E. Sabel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

As public expectations for health rise, health measurements broaden from a focus on death, disease, and disability to wellbeing. However, wellbeing hasn’t been incorporated into the framework of climate change policy decision-making in Chinese cities. Based on survey data (n = 763) from Suzhou, this study used Generalized Estimation Equation approach to model external conditions associated with wellbeing. Then, semi-quantitative analyses were conducted to provide a first indication to whether local climate change policies promote or conflict with wellbeing through altering these conditions. Our findings suggested: (i) Socio-demographic (age, job satisfaction, health), psychosocial (satisfaction with social life, ontological security/resilience) and environmental conditions (distance to busy road, noise annoyance and range hoods in the kitchen) were significantly associated with wellbeing; (ii) None of existing climate change strategies in Suzhou conflict with wellbeing. Three mitigation policies (promotion of tertiary and high–tech industry, increased renewable energy in buildings, and restrictions on car use) and one adaption policy (increasing resilience) brought positive co–benefits for wellbeing, through the availability of high-satisfied jobs, reduced dependence on range hoods, noise reduction, and valuing citizens, respectively. This study also provided implications for other similar Chinese cities that potential consequences of climate change interventions for wellbeing should be considered.

Original languageEnglish
Article number344
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

Climate Change
China
Noise
Renewable Energy
Job Satisfaction
Policy Making
Health
Decision Making
Industry
Public Health
Demography
Conflict (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Chinese city
  • Climate change
  • Co-benefits
  • Policy implications
  • Wellbeing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Do climate change policies promote or conflict with subjective wellbeing : A case study of Suzhou, China. / Liu, Miaomiao; Huang, Yining; Hiscock, Rosemary; Li, Qin; Bi, Jun; Kinney, Patrick L.; Sabel, Clive E.

In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 13, No. 3, 344, 21.03.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{648f1ae908df44799ccfc0b15f4fd63a,
title = "Do climate change policies promote or conflict with subjective wellbeing: A case study of Suzhou, China",
abstract = "As public expectations for health rise, health measurements broaden from a focus on death, disease, and disability to wellbeing. However, wellbeing hasn’t been incorporated into the framework of climate change policy decision-making in Chinese cities. Based on survey data (n = 763) from Suzhou, this study used Generalized Estimation Equation approach to model external conditions associated with wellbeing. Then, semi-quantitative analyses were conducted to provide a first indication to whether local climate change policies promote or conflict with wellbeing through altering these conditions. Our findings suggested: (i) Socio-demographic (age, job satisfaction, health), psychosocial (satisfaction with social life, ontological security/resilience) and environmental conditions (distance to busy road, noise annoyance and range hoods in the kitchen) were significantly associated with wellbeing; (ii) None of existing climate change strategies in Suzhou conflict with wellbeing. Three mitigation policies (promotion of tertiary and high–tech industry, increased renewable energy in buildings, and restrictions on car use) and one adaption policy (increasing resilience) brought positive co–benefits for wellbeing, through the availability of high-satisfied jobs, reduced dependence on range hoods, noise reduction, and valuing citizens, respectively. This study also provided implications for other similar Chinese cities that potential consequences of climate change interventions for wellbeing should be considered.",
keywords = "Chinese city, Climate change, Co-benefits, Policy implications, Wellbeing",
author = "Miaomiao Liu and Yining Huang and Rosemary Hiscock and Qin Li and Jun Bi and Kinney, {Patrick L.} and Sabel, {Clive E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "21",
doi = "10.3390/ijerph13030344",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
issn = "1660-4601",
publisher = "Molecular Diversity Preservation International",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do climate change policies promote or conflict with subjective wellbeing

T2 - A case study of Suzhou, China

AU - Liu, Miaomiao

AU - Huang, Yining

AU - Hiscock, Rosemary

AU - Li, Qin

AU - Bi, Jun

AU - Kinney, Patrick L.

AU - Sabel, Clive E.

PY - 2016/3/21

Y1 - 2016/3/21

N2 - As public expectations for health rise, health measurements broaden from a focus on death, disease, and disability to wellbeing. However, wellbeing hasn’t been incorporated into the framework of climate change policy decision-making in Chinese cities. Based on survey data (n = 763) from Suzhou, this study used Generalized Estimation Equation approach to model external conditions associated with wellbeing. Then, semi-quantitative analyses were conducted to provide a first indication to whether local climate change policies promote or conflict with wellbeing through altering these conditions. Our findings suggested: (i) Socio-demographic (age, job satisfaction, health), psychosocial (satisfaction with social life, ontological security/resilience) and environmental conditions (distance to busy road, noise annoyance and range hoods in the kitchen) were significantly associated with wellbeing; (ii) None of existing climate change strategies in Suzhou conflict with wellbeing. Three mitigation policies (promotion of tertiary and high–tech industry, increased renewable energy in buildings, and restrictions on car use) and one adaption policy (increasing resilience) brought positive co–benefits for wellbeing, through the availability of high-satisfied jobs, reduced dependence on range hoods, noise reduction, and valuing citizens, respectively. This study also provided implications for other similar Chinese cities that potential consequences of climate change interventions for wellbeing should be considered.

AB - As public expectations for health rise, health measurements broaden from a focus on death, disease, and disability to wellbeing. However, wellbeing hasn’t been incorporated into the framework of climate change policy decision-making in Chinese cities. Based on survey data (n = 763) from Suzhou, this study used Generalized Estimation Equation approach to model external conditions associated with wellbeing. Then, semi-quantitative analyses were conducted to provide a first indication to whether local climate change policies promote or conflict with wellbeing through altering these conditions. Our findings suggested: (i) Socio-demographic (age, job satisfaction, health), psychosocial (satisfaction with social life, ontological security/resilience) and environmental conditions (distance to busy road, noise annoyance and range hoods in the kitchen) were significantly associated with wellbeing; (ii) None of existing climate change strategies in Suzhou conflict with wellbeing. Three mitigation policies (promotion of tertiary and high–tech industry, increased renewable energy in buildings, and restrictions on car use) and one adaption policy (increasing resilience) brought positive co–benefits for wellbeing, through the availability of high-satisfied jobs, reduced dependence on range hoods, noise reduction, and valuing citizens, respectively. This study also provided implications for other similar Chinese cities that potential consequences of climate change interventions for wellbeing should be considered.

KW - Chinese city

KW - Climate change

KW - Co-benefits

KW - Policy implications

KW - Wellbeing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961620195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph13030344

DO - 10.3390/ijerph13030344

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

SN - 1660-4601

IS - 3

M1 - 344

ER -