Do Alu repeats drive the evolution of the primate transcriptome?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)
56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Of all repetitive elements in the human genome, Alus are unusual in being enriched near to genes that are expressed across a broad range of tissues. This has led to the proposal that Alus might be modifying the expression breadth of neighboring genes, possibly by providing CpG islands, modifying transcription factor binding, or altering chromatin structure. Here we consider whether Alus have increased expression breadth of genes in their vicinity. Results: Contrary to the modification hypothesis, we find that those genes that have always had broad expression are richest in Alus, whereas those that are more likely to have become more broadly expressed have lower enrichment. This finding is consistent with a model in which Alus accumulate near broadly expressed genes but do not affect their expression breadth. Furthermore, this model is consistent with the finding that expression breadth of mouse genes predicts Alu density near their human orthologs. However, Alus were found to be related to some alternative measures of transcription profile divergence, although evidence is contradictory as to whether Alus associate with lowly or highly diverged genes. If Alu have any effect it is not by provision of CpG islands, because they are especially rare near to transcriptional start sites. Previously reported Alu enrichment for genes serving certain cellular functions, suggested to be evidence of functional importance of Alus, appears to be partly a byproduct of the association with broadly expressed genes. Conclusion: The abundance of Alu near broadly expressed genes is better explained by their preferential preservation near to housekeeping genes rather than by a modifying effect on expression of genes.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberR25
Number of pages16
JournalGenome Biology
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2008

Fingerprint

Transcriptome
transcriptome
primate
Primates
gene
Genes
genes
CpG Islands
Gene Expression
gene expression
Essential Genes
Human Genome
byproducts
Chromatin
chromatin
Transcription Factors
transcription factors
transcription (genetics)
genome
divergence

Cite this

Do Alu repeats drive the evolution of the primate transcriptome? / Urrutia, Araxi O; Ocana, L B; Hurst, L D.

In: Genome Biology, Vol. 9, No. 2, R25, 01.02.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7e58515a5f184ab2b7c9974db8804436,
title = "Do Alu repeats drive the evolution of the primate transcriptome?",
abstract = "Background: Of all repetitive elements in the human genome, Alus are unusual in being enriched near to genes that are expressed across a broad range of tissues. This has led to the proposal that Alus might be modifying the expression breadth of neighboring genes, possibly by providing CpG islands, modifying transcription factor binding, or altering chromatin structure. Here we consider whether Alus have increased expression breadth of genes in their vicinity. Results: Contrary to the modification hypothesis, we find that those genes that have always had broad expression are richest in Alus, whereas those that are more likely to have become more broadly expressed have lower enrichment. This finding is consistent with a model in which Alus accumulate near broadly expressed genes but do not affect their expression breadth. Furthermore, this model is consistent with the finding that expression breadth of mouse genes predicts Alu density near their human orthologs. However, Alus were found to be related to some alternative measures of transcription profile divergence, although evidence is contradictory as to whether Alus associate with lowly or highly diverged genes. If Alu have any effect it is not by provision of CpG islands, because they are especially rare near to transcriptional start sites. Previously reported Alu enrichment for genes serving certain cellular functions, suggested to be evidence of functional importance of Alus, appears to be partly a byproduct of the association with broadly expressed genes. Conclusion: The abundance of Alu near broadly expressed genes is better explained by their preferential preservation near to housekeeping genes rather than by a modifying effect on expression of genes.",
author = "Urrutia, {Araxi O} and Ocana, {L B} and Hurst, {L D}",
note = "ID number: ISI:000254659300008",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-r25",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Genome Biology",
issn = "1474-760X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Alu repeats drive the evolution of the primate transcriptome?

AU - Urrutia, Araxi O

AU - Ocana, L B

AU - Hurst, L D

N1 - ID number: ISI:000254659300008

PY - 2008/2/1

Y1 - 2008/2/1

N2 - Background: Of all repetitive elements in the human genome, Alus are unusual in being enriched near to genes that are expressed across a broad range of tissues. This has led to the proposal that Alus might be modifying the expression breadth of neighboring genes, possibly by providing CpG islands, modifying transcription factor binding, or altering chromatin structure. Here we consider whether Alus have increased expression breadth of genes in their vicinity. Results: Contrary to the modification hypothesis, we find that those genes that have always had broad expression are richest in Alus, whereas those that are more likely to have become more broadly expressed have lower enrichment. This finding is consistent with a model in which Alus accumulate near broadly expressed genes but do not affect their expression breadth. Furthermore, this model is consistent with the finding that expression breadth of mouse genes predicts Alu density near their human orthologs. However, Alus were found to be related to some alternative measures of transcription profile divergence, although evidence is contradictory as to whether Alus associate with lowly or highly diverged genes. If Alu have any effect it is not by provision of CpG islands, because they are especially rare near to transcriptional start sites. Previously reported Alu enrichment for genes serving certain cellular functions, suggested to be evidence of functional importance of Alus, appears to be partly a byproduct of the association with broadly expressed genes. Conclusion: The abundance of Alu near broadly expressed genes is better explained by their preferential preservation near to housekeeping genes rather than by a modifying effect on expression of genes.

AB - Background: Of all repetitive elements in the human genome, Alus are unusual in being enriched near to genes that are expressed across a broad range of tissues. This has led to the proposal that Alus might be modifying the expression breadth of neighboring genes, possibly by providing CpG islands, modifying transcription factor binding, or altering chromatin structure. Here we consider whether Alus have increased expression breadth of genes in their vicinity. Results: Contrary to the modification hypothesis, we find that those genes that have always had broad expression are richest in Alus, whereas those that are more likely to have become more broadly expressed have lower enrichment. This finding is consistent with a model in which Alus accumulate near broadly expressed genes but do not affect their expression breadth. Furthermore, this model is consistent with the finding that expression breadth of mouse genes predicts Alu density near their human orthologs. However, Alus were found to be related to some alternative measures of transcription profile divergence, although evidence is contradictory as to whether Alus associate with lowly or highly diverged genes. If Alu have any effect it is not by provision of CpG islands, because they are especially rare near to transcriptional start sites. Previously reported Alu enrichment for genes serving certain cellular functions, suggested to be evidence of functional importance of Alus, appears to be partly a byproduct of the association with broadly expressed genes. Conclusion: The abundance of Alu near broadly expressed genes is better explained by their preferential preservation near to housekeeping genes rather than by a modifying effect on expression of genes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43549086436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-r25

U2 - 10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-r25

DO - 10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-r25

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Genome Biology

JF - Genome Biology

SN - 1474-760X

IS - 2

M1 - R25

ER -