Distributed Leadership; Friend or Foe?

Alma Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Distributed leadership is now widely known and variously enacted in schools and school systems. Distributed leadership implies a fundamental re-conceptualisation of leadership as practice and challenges conventional wisdom about the relationship between formal leadership and organisational performance. There has been much debate, speculation and discussion about its positive and negative aspects. This article considers the evidence. It examines the facts concerning distributed leadership. It does not claim to be a systematic review of the literature but rather draws upon the available empirical evidence to highlight what we know. The article considers the implications, arising from the evidence for those in formal leadership positions. It concludes by reflecting upon the role of the formal leader within distributed leadership and outlines some of the challenges and tensions associated with distributed leadership practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)545 - 554
Number of pages10
JournalEducational Management Administration and Leadership
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Sep 2013

Fingerprint

leadership
evidence
Distributed leadership
speculation
school system
wisdom
leader
school
performance

Cite this

Distributed Leadership; Friend or Foe? / Harris, Alma.

In: Educational Management Administration and Leadership, Vol. 41, No. 5, 03.09.2013, p. 545 - 554.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harris, Alma. / Distributed Leadership; Friend or Foe?. In: Educational Management Administration and Leadership. 2013 ; Vol. 41, No. 5. pp. 545 - 554.
@article{adcbc3a603b14259ad557487ab2a0efb,
title = "Distributed Leadership; Friend or Foe?",
abstract = "Distributed leadership is now widely known and variously enacted in schools and school systems. Distributed leadership implies a fundamental re-conceptualisation of leadership as practice and challenges conventional wisdom about the relationship between formal leadership and organisational performance. There has been much debate, speculation and discussion about its positive and negative aspects. This article considers the evidence. It examines the facts concerning distributed leadership. It does not claim to be a systematic review of the literature but rather draws upon the available empirical evidence to highlight what we know. The article considers the implications, arising from the evidence for those in formal leadership positions. It concludes by reflecting upon the role of the formal leader within distributed leadership and outlines some of the challenges and tensions associated with distributed leadership practice.",
author = "Alma Harris",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1177/1741143213497635",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "545 -- 554",
journal = "Educational Management Administration and Leadership",
issn = "1741-1432",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distributed Leadership; Friend or Foe?

AU - Harris, Alma

PY - 2013/9/3

Y1 - 2013/9/3

N2 - Distributed leadership is now widely known and variously enacted in schools and school systems. Distributed leadership implies a fundamental re-conceptualisation of leadership as practice and challenges conventional wisdom about the relationship between formal leadership and organisational performance. There has been much debate, speculation and discussion about its positive and negative aspects. This article considers the evidence. It examines the facts concerning distributed leadership. It does not claim to be a systematic review of the literature but rather draws upon the available empirical evidence to highlight what we know. The article considers the implications, arising from the evidence for those in formal leadership positions. It concludes by reflecting upon the role of the formal leader within distributed leadership and outlines some of the challenges and tensions associated with distributed leadership practice.

AB - Distributed leadership is now widely known and variously enacted in schools and school systems. Distributed leadership implies a fundamental re-conceptualisation of leadership as practice and challenges conventional wisdom about the relationship between formal leadership and organisational performance. There has been much debate, speculation and discussion about its positive and negative aspects. This article considers the evidence. It examines the facts concerning distributed leadership. It does not claim to be a systematic review of the literature but rather draws upon the available empirical evidence to highlight what we know. The article considers the implications, arising from the evidence for those in formal leadership positions. It concludes by reflecting upon the role of the formal leader within distributed leadership and outlines some of the challenges and tensions associated with distributed leadership practice.

U2 - 10.1177/1741143213497635

DO - 10.1177/1741143213497635

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 545

EP - 554

JO - Educational Management Administration and Leadership

JF - Educational Management Administration and Leadership

SN - 1741-1432

IS - 5

ER -