Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Abstract

Quantifying the dynamics of macroevolutionary trends, such as changes in body size and complexity, is vital for understanding the processes that have shaped patterns of extant and extinct biodiversity. For example, whilst maximum body size may tend to increase within lineages (the Cope-Depéret rule), it is still unclear whether such patterns are driven by selection preferentially operating in one direction or are passive outcomes of diffusive processes. Increasingly, empirical studies reveal the need for better models of these processes, especially when phylogenies are incomplete or unavailable. Here, we present a flexible, non-phylogenetic model that captures key macroevolutionary processes—speciation, extinction and both passive (unbiased) and driven (biased) trait evolution—whilst accounting for physical and biological constraints. Our model incorporates three types of boundary condition: Dirichlet, Neumann and zero-flux, to represent real-world limits on trait evolution, such as biomechanical constraints on body size. We demonstrate the utility of our modelling approach by applying it to two distinct datasets: the body mass distribution of extant mammals and the size evolution of bivalves and brachiopods over geological time. In mammals, we detect driven trait evolution towards smaller body masses, but this is counteracted by passive diffusion, bounded by a lower mass limit, resulting in increased modal, mean and maximum body masses over time. In bivalves and brachiopods, the model captures a consistent evolution towards larger body sizes, revealing that both modern bivalves and brachiopods appear limited by an upper size boundary. Notably, the Permian-Trassic mass extinction triggered a significant shift in brachiopod evolutionary dynamics, emphasising how environmental upheavals can alter trait evolution. These results demonstrate how a small number of mechanisms can model the processes producing various trait distributions when boundaries are imposed to limit the range of possible traits. Importantly, our approach allows us to detect multiple, overlapping processes, apparently acting in opposition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2067-2081
Number of pages15
JournalMethods in Ecology and Evolution
Volume16
Issue number9
Early online date17 Jul 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2025

Data Availability Statement

The mammal data underlying this publication are available in figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3297995.v1 (Smith et al., 2003). The bivalve and brachiopod size data are permanently archived in the Stanford Digital Repository at http://purl.stanford.edu/hs422jm3330 (Payne et al., 2014). The first and last appearance dates for each bivalve and brachiopod genus included in our analysis are available through the Paleobiology Database at https://doi.org/10.15468/jfqhiu (McClennen et al., 2024).

Funding

Matthew Wills would like to acknowledge the support of the John Templeton Foundation Grant (grant number: 61408). Elliot Butterworth would like to acknowledge EPSRC\u2010SCI\u2010DTA funding (EP/W524712/1).

FundersFunder number
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
John Templeton Foundation61408

Keywords

  • evolution
  • modelling
  • passive and driven trait evolution
  • trait boundaries
  • trait diversity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecological Modelling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Distinguishing Passive and Driven Trait Evolution in the presence of Boundaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this