Disposal or dispersal?

Environmentalism and final treatment of the British dead

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)
257 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In current environmental discourse, disposal does not remove and destroy waste but rather transforms it into something useful or harmful and/or re-locates it. This article shows how this operates when the ‘waste’ comprises human remains, specifically how innovative ‘dispersal’ practices are now challenging the ‘disposal’ discourse of nineteenth-century burial and twentieth-century cremation which contained the dead within special death spaces separated from everyday environments for living. Since the 1990s, disposal practices have been supplemented by practices with an entirely different rationale. Instead of containing the dead in safe, out of the way places, new practices disperse human remains back into environments that sustain the living, whether this be via natural burial, new cremation practices or new technologies currently being developed, namely alkaline hydrolysis and freeze-drying. Promoters of all these innovations appeal to ecological usefulness, blurring the boundary between the living and the dead, thereby positioning the dead body as a gift to the living and/or to the planet. Thus, a new ecological mentality is increasingly framing the management of all the dead – not just those interred in natural burial grounds. In the light of this, we reconsider land use policy, and question death studies’ use of the term ‘disposal’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-260
Number of pages18
JournalMortality
Volume19
Issue number3
Early online date28 May 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2014

Fingerprint

Burial
Cremation
funeral
Planets
Gift Giving
Freeze Drying
death
Hydrolysis
Therapeutics
discourse
Technology
mentality
gift
new technology
appeal
nineteenth century
twentieth century
land use
Environmentalism
innovation

Keywords

  • cremation
  • ecology
  • gift
  • natural burial
  • promession
  • Resomation
  • sequestration

Cite this

Disposal or dispersal? Environmentalism and final treatment of the British dead. / Rumble, Hannah; Troyer, John; Walter, Tony; Woodthorpe, Kate.

In: Mortality, Vol. 19, No. 3, 31.12.2014, p. 243-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cb4cffb94ed24355b27ddde6f00f291a,
title = "Disposal or dispersal?: Environmentalism and final treatment of the British dead",
abstract = "In current environmental discourse, disposal does not remove and destroy waste but rather transforms it into something useful or harmful and/or re-locates it. This article shows how this operates when the ‘waste’ comprises human remains, specifically how innovative ‘dispersal’ practices are now challenging the ‘disposal’ discourse of nineteenth-century burial and twentieth-century cremation which contained the dead within special death spaces separated from everyday environments for living. Since the 1990s, disposal practices have been supplemented by practices with an entirely different rationale. Instead of containing the dead in safe, out of the way places, new practices disperse human remains back into environments that sustain the living, whether this be via natural burial, new cremation practices or new technologies currently being developed, namely alkaline hydrolysis and freeze-drying. Promoters of all these innovations appeal to ecological usefulness, blurring the boundary between the living and the dead, thereby positioning the dead body as a gift to the living and/or to the planet. Thus, a new ecological mentality is increasingly framing the management of all the dead – not just those interred in natural burial grounds. In the light of this, we reconsider land use policy, and question death studies’ use of the term ‘disposal’.",
keywords = "cremation, ecology, gift, natural burial, promession, Resomation, sequestration",
author = "Hannah Rumble and John Troyer and Tony Walter and Kate Woodthorpe",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/13576275.2014.920315",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "243--260",
journal = "Mortality",
issn = "1357-6275",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disposal or dispersal?

T2 - Environmentalism and final treatment of the British dead

AU - Rumble, Hannah

AU - Troyer, John

AU - Walter, Tony

AU - Woodthorpe, Kate

PY - 2014/12/31

Y1 - 2014/12/31

N2 - In current environmental discourse, disposal does not remove and destroy waste but rather transforms it into something useful or harmful and/or re-locates it. This article shows how this operates when the ‘waste’ comprises human remains, specifically how innovative ‘dispersal’ practices are now challenging the ‘disposal’ discourse of nineteenth-century burial and twentieth-century cremation which contained the dead within special death spaces separated from everyday environments for living. Since the 1990s, disposal practices have been supplemented by practices with an entirely different rationale. Instead of containing the dead in safe, out of the way places, new practices disperse human remains back into environments that sustain the living, whether this be via natural burial, new cremation practices or new technologies currently being developed, namely alkaline hydrolysis and freeze-drying. Promoters of all these innovations appeal to ecological usefulness, blurring the boundary between the living and the dead, thereby positioning the dead body as a gift to the living and/or to the planet. Thus, a new ecological mentality is increasingly framing the management of all the dead – not just those interred in natural burial grounds. In the light of this, we reconsider land use policy, and question death studies’ use of the term ‘disposal’.

AB - In current environmental discourse, disposal does not remove and destroy waste but rather transforms it into something useful or harmful and/or re-locates it. This article shows how this operates when the ‘waste’ comprises human remains, specifically how innovative ‘dispersal’ practices are now challenging the ‘disposal’ discourse of nineteenth-century burial and twentieth-century cremation which contained the dead within special death spaces separated from everyday environments for living. Since the 1990s, disposal practices have been supplemented by practices with an entirely different rationale. Instead of containing the dead in safe, out of the way places, new practices disperse human remains back into environments that sustain the living, whether this be via natural burial, new cremation practices or new technologies currently being developed, namely alkaline hydrolysis and freeze-drying. Promoters of all these innovations appeal to ecological usefulness, blurring the boundary between the living and the dead, thereby positioning the dead body as a gift to the living and/or to the planet. Thus, a new ecological mentality is increasingly framing the management of all the dead – not just those interred in natural burial grounds. In the light of this, we reconsider land use policy, and question death studies’ use of the term ‘disposal’.

KW - cremation

KW - ecology

KW - gift

KW - natural burial

KW - promession

KW - Resomation

KW - sequestration

U2 - 10.1080/13576275.2014.920315

DO - 10.1080/13576275.2014.920315

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 243

EP - 260

JO - Mortality

JF - Mortality

SN - 1357-6275

IS - 3

ER -