Disk Kinematics at High Redshift: DysmalPy’s Extension to 3D Modeling and Comparison with Different Approaches

Lilian l. Lee, Natascha m. Förster schreiber, Sedona h. Price, Daizhong Liu, Reinhard Genzel, Ric Davies, Linda j. Tacconi, Taro t. Shimizu, Amit Nestor shachar, Juan m. Espejo salcedo, Stavros Pastras, Stijn Wuyts, Dieter Lutz, Alvio Renzini, Hannah Übler, Rodrigo Herrera-Camus, Amiel Sternberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Spatially resolved emission-line kinematics are invaluable for investigating fundamental galaxy properties and have become increasingly accessible for galaxies at z ≳0.5 through sensitive near-infrared imaging spectroscopy and millimeter interferometry. Kinematic modeling is at the core of the analysis and interpretation of such data sets, which at high z present challenges due to the lower signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) and resolution compared to the data of local galaxies. We present and test the 3D fitting functionality of DysmalPy, examining how well it recovers the intrinsic disk rotation velocity and velocity dispersion, using a large suite of axisymmetric models, covering a range of galaxy properties and observational parameters typical of z ∼ 1−3 star-forming galaxies. We also compare DysmalPy's recovery performance to that of two other commonly used codes, GalPak3D and 3DBarolo, which we use in turn to create additional sets of models to benchmark DysmalPy. Over the ranges of S/N, resolution, mass, and velocity dispersion explored, the rotation velocity is accurately recovered by all tools. The velocity dispersion is recovered well at high S/N, but the impact of methodology differences is more apparent. In particular, template differences for parametric tools and S/N sensitivity for the nonparametric tool can lead to differences of up to a factor of 2. Our tests highlight and the importance of deep, high-resolution data and the need for careful consideration of (i) the choice of priors (parametric approaches); and (ii) the masking (all approaches); and (iii), more generally, the evaluating of the suitability of each approach to the specific data at hand. This paper accompanies the public release of DysmalPy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14
JournalThe Astrophysical Journal
Volume978
Issue number1
Early online date1 Jan 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2025

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous referee for the constructive comments. We are very grateful for the useful discussions with and insightful comments at various stages of this work from Tim de Zeeuw, Stéphane Courteau, Nathan Deg, Nicolas Bouché, Emily Wisnioski, Jianhang Chen, and Minju Lee.

Funding

N.M.F.S. and J.M.E.S. acknowledge financial support from the European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Grant under the European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation programme (grant agreement AdG GALPHYS, No. 101055023). H.Ü. gratefully acknowledges support by the Isaac Newton Trust and by the Kavli Foundation through a Newton–Kavli Junior Fellowship.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disk Kinematics at High Redshift: DysmalPy’s Extension to 3D Modeling and Comparison with Different Approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this