Discussion paper: Identifying and resolving methodological issues in previous Africa-wide electricity planning optimisation research - A comment of Sanoh et al. (2014)

Philipp A. Trotter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An enormous gap exists between Africa's current electrification rate and the 2030 UN goal to ensure universal access to modern energy. A study by Sanoh et al. published in Renewable Energy in 2014 [1] is a rare example of finding a cost minimal solution for the Africa-wide generation and transmission network. Unfortunately, however, the paper exhibits a number of relatively serious flaws that demand attention given the alarming paucity of such research on Africa. Five issues of the study by Sanoh et al. are identified and discussed in this commentary paper. Specifically, the study does not account for capacity factors when deriving required capacity additions, misses transmission losses when sizing generation capacity, models country-level import constraints incorrectly, introduces a supply option redundancy, and reports optimisation results that can be shown to be mathematically sub-optimal. As a result of some of these issues, the Sanoh et al. significantly underreport the required capacity to meet additional African demand in 2025. In addition to discussing these flaws, this paper provides potential approaches to avoid each of the five issues.

Original languageEnglish
JournalRenewable Energy
Volume114
Issue numberPart B
Early online date11 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Discussion paper: Identifying and resolving methodological issues in previous Africa-wide electricity planning optimisation research - A comment of Sanoh et al. (2014)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this