Disabled asylum seekers as experimental subjects in a broader systemic agenda of inequality

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The reduction in public services since 2008 has undoubtedly affected some
groups, such as disabled people, more than others. Many of these cuts,
ostensibly imposed in response to recession, bear similarities to measures
previously tried and tested on disabled asylum seekers. I argue that the
perception of national crisis was used by government as a smokescreen to
expand the population affected by such policies, thereby asserting a predetermined neoliberal agenda of public expenditure cuts.

The inequality of this situation is compounded by the entitlements granted to
people deemed exceptionally worthy. The Vulnerable Persons Relocation
Scheme for Syrian nationals includes disability among the eligibility criteria,
offering considerably greater entitlements than available to asylum seekers.
If the response to certain people is markedly different to that offered to
others, then negative consequences can be anticipated, as from any other
example of inequality. Furthermore, this scheme promotes a significant shift
in migrant entitlement. The UK government has no legal obligation towards
this group; therefore, those people who are selected are recipients of gifts
rather than people claiming their rights. I explore the nature and implications
of such differences in entitlement, arguing that inequality in all its manifestations must be challenged to reduce deprivation and to avoid negative consequences for the wider population.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationInequalities in the UK
Subtitle of host publicationNew discourses, evolutions and actions
EditorsDavid Fee, Anemone Kober-Smith
PublisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Pages235-252
ISBN (Print)9781787144804
DOIs
StatusPublished - 12 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

asylum seeker
public expenditures
move
gift
recession
deprivation
public service
obligation
migrant
recipient
Group
disability
human being

Cite this

Yeo, R. A. (2017). Disabled asylum seekers as experimental subjects in a broader systemic agenda of inequality. In D. Fee, & A. Kober-Smith (Eds.), Inequalities in the UK: New discourses, evolutions and actions (pp. 235-252). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-479-820171012

Disabled asylum seekers as experimental subjects in a broader systemic agenda of inequality. / Yeo, Rebecca Amani.

Inequalities in the UK: New discourses, evolutions and actions. ed. / David Fee; Anemone Kober-Smith. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2017. p. 235-252.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Yeo, RA 2017, Disabled asylum seekers as experimental subjects in a broader systemic agenda of inequality. in D Fee & A Kober-Smith (eds), Inequalities in the UK: New discourses, evolutions and actions. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., pp. 235-252. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-479-820171012
Yeo RA. Disabled asylum seekers as experimental subjects in a broader systemic agenda of inequality. In Fee D, Kober-Smith A, editors, Inequalities in the UK: New discourses, evolutions and actions. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. 2017. p. 235-252 https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-479-820171012
Yeo, Rebecca Amani. / Disabled asylum seekers as experimental subjects in a broader systemic agenda of inequality. Inequalities in the UK: New discourses, evolutions and actions. editor / David Fee ; Anemone Kober-Smith. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2017. pp. 235-252
@inbook{4e9026ce54c14f5aac15dc5c49af18e6,
title = "Disabled asylum seekers as experimental subjects in a broader systemic agenda of inequality",
abstract = "The reduction in public services since 2008 has undoubtedly affected somegroups, such as disabled people, more than others. Many of these cuts,ostensibly imposed in response to recession, bear similarities to measurespreviously tried and tested on disabled asylum seekers. I argue that theperception of national crisis was used by government as a smokescreen toexpand the population affected by such policies, thereby asserting a predetermined neoliberal agenda of public expenditure cuts.The inequality of this situation is compounded by the entitlements granted topeople deemed exceptionally worthy. The Vulnerable Persons RelocationScheme for Syrian nationals includes disability among the eligibility criteria,offering considerably greater entitlements than available to asylum seekers.If the response to certain people is markedly different to that offered toothers, then negative consequences can be anticipated, as from any otherexample of inequality. Furthermore, this scheme promotes a significant shiftin migrant entitlement. The UK government has no legal obligation towardsthis group; therefore, those people who are selected are recipients of giftsrather than people claiming their rights. I explore the nature and implicationsof such differences in entitlement, arguing that inequality in all its manifestations must be challenged to reduce deprivation and to avoid negative consequences for the wider population.",
author = "Yeo, {Rebecca Amani}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1108/978-1-78714-479-820171012",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781787144804",
pages = "235--252",
editor = "David Fee and Anemone Kober-Smith",
booktitle = "Inequalities in the UK",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
address = "UK United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Disabled asylum seekers as experimental subjects in a broader systemic agenda of inequality

AU - Yeo, Rebecca Amani

PY - 2017/11/12

Y1 - 2017/11/12

N2 - The reduction in public services since 2008 has undoubtedly affected somegroups, such as disabled people, more than others. Many of these cuts,ostensibly imposed in response to recession, bear similarities to measurespreviously tried and tested on disabled asylum seekers. I argue that theperception of national crisis was used by government as a smokescreen toexpand the population affected by such policies, thereby asserting a predetermined neoliberal agenda of public expenditure cuts.The inequality of this situation is compounded by the entitlements granted topeople deemed exceptionally worthy. The Vulnerable Persons RelocationScheme for Syrian nationals includes disability among the eligibility criteria,offering considerably greater entitlements than available to asylum seekers.If the response to certain people is markedly different to that offered toothers, then negative consequences can be anticipated, as from any otherexample of inequality. Furthermore, this scheme promotes a significant shiftin migrant entitlement. The UK government has no legal obligation towardsthis group; therefore, those people who are selected are recipients of giftsrather than people claiming their rights. I explore the nature and implicationsof such differences in entitlement, arguing that inequality in all its manifestations must be challenged to reduce deprivation and to avoid negative consequences for the wider population.

AB - The reduction in public services since 2008 has undoubtedly affected somegroups, such as disabled people, more than others. Many of these cuts,ostensibly imposed in response to recession, bear similarities to measurespreviously tried and tested on disabled asylum seekers. I argue that theperception of national crisis was used by government as a smokescreen toexpand the population affected by such policies, thereby asserting a predetermined neoliberal agenda of public expenditure cuts.The inequality of this situation is compounded by the entitlements granted topeople deemed exceptionally worthy. The Vulnerable Persons RelocationScheme for Syrian nationals includes disability among the eligibility criteria,offering considerably greater entitlements than available to asylum seekers.If the response to certain people is markedly different to that offered toothers, then negative consequences can be anticipated, as from any otherexample of inequality. Furthermore, this scheme promotes a significant shiftin migrant entitlement. The UK government has no legal obligation towardsthis group; therefore, those people who are selected are recipients of giftsrather than people claiming their rights. I explore the nature and implicationsof such differences in entitlement, arguing that inequality in all its manifestations must be challenged to reduce deprivation and to avoid negative consequences for the wider population.

UR - https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-479-820171012

UR - http://books.emeraldinsight.com/page/detail/Inequalities-in-the-UK/?k=9781787144804

U2 - 10.1108/978-1-78714-479-820171012

DO - 10.1108/978-1-78714-479-820171012

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781787144804

SP - 235

EP - 252

BT - Inequalities in the UK

A2 - Fee, David

A2 - Kober-Smith, Anemone

PB - Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

ER -