TY - JOUR
T1 - Directed discovery of greener cosolvents
T2 - new cosolvents for use in ionic liquid based organic electrolyte solutions for cellulose dissolution
AU - Gale, Ella
AU - Wirawan, Remigius H.
AU - Silveira, Rodrigo L.
AU - Pereira, Caroline S.
AU - Johns, Marcus A.
AU - Skaf, Munir S.
AU - Scott, Janet L.
PY - 2016/11/7
Y1 - 2016/11/7
N2 - Cellulose is an abundant, cheap, renewable, yet recalcitrant, material, which, if dissolved, may be formed into a wide range of materials, composites and mixtures. Much attention has recently been focused on the use of mixtures of ionic liquids and some solvents (so-called organic electrolyte solutions, OESs) as efficient cellulose dissolution solvents, but many of the cosolvents used lack green credentials – a perennial problem where dipolar aprotic solvents are the solvents of choice. We present a rational approach, based on definition of ranges of solvent parameters gathered together in recently published databases, to find ‘greener’ cosolvents for OES formation. Thus, γ-butyrolactone is identified as a suitable OES former for dissolution of microcrystalline cellulose and biobased γ-valerolactone as a marginally less efficient, but significantly safer, alternative. Comparison of cosolvent efficiency reveals that previous use of measures of mass, or concentration, of cellulose dissolved may have masked the similarities between 1-methylimidazole, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylformamide, N-N’-dimethylimidazolidinone, N,N-dimethylacetamide, N-methylpyrrolidinone and sulfolane (seldom considered), while comparison on a molar basis reveals that the molar volume of the solvent is an important factor. Reference-interaction site model (RISM) calculations for the DMSO/1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate OES suggest competition between DMSO and the acetate anion and preferential solvation of cellulose by the ionic liquid.
AB - Cellulose is an abundant, cheap, renewable, yet recalcitrant, material, which, if dissolved, may be formed into a wide range of materials, composites and mixtures. Much attention has recently been focused on the use of mixtures of ionic liquids and some solvents (so-called organic electrolyte solutions, OESs) as efficient cellulose dissolution solvents, but many of the cosolvents used lack green credentials – a perennial problem where dipolar aprotic solvents are the solvents of choice. We present a rational approach, based on definition of ranges of solvent parameters gathered together in recently published databases, to find ‘greener’ cosolvents for OES formation. Thus, γ-butyrolactone is identified as a suitable OES former for dissolution of microcrystalline cellulose and biobased γ-valerolactone as a marginally less efficient, but significantly safer, alternative. Comparison of cosolvent efficiency reveals that previous use of measures of mass, or concentration, of cellulose dissolved may have masked the similarities between 1-methylimidazole, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylformamide, N-N’-dimethylimidazolidinone, N,N-dimethylacetamide, N-methylpyrrolidinone and sulfolane (seldom considered), while comparison on a molar basis reveals that the molar volume of the solvent is an important factor. Reference-interaction site model (RISM) calculations for the DMSO/1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate OES suggest competition between DMSO and the acetate anion and preferential solvation of cellulose by the ionic liquid.
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02020
U2 - 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02020
DO - 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02020
M3 - Article
VL - 4
SP - 6200
EP - 6207
JO - ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering
JF - ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering
IS - 11
ER -