Dilemmas of public participation in science policy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Public participation is ubiquitous in many contemporary democratic societies – used for many purposes, and in many contexts, with particular and growing relevance for policy-making on science and technology issues. However, there is a dearth of evidence as to its qualities and benefits. We contend that the implementation and interpretation of participation faces a number of dilemmas that – together –undermine its successful adoption. In this paper, we identify and discuss six specific dilemmas that – together – may militate against the practice and development of good quality participation in science and technology policy, notably dilemmas of Timing; of Relevance; of Representation; of Evaluation; of Criticism; and of Impact. We theoretically account for these dilemmas and discuss their likely impacts. Finally, we provide some suggestions as to how the participation community might attempt to pre-empt difficulties due to these dilemmas and demonstrate participation effectiveness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)204-221
Number of pages18
JournalPolicy Studies
Volume39
Issue number2
Early online date20 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

science policy
participation
science
criticism
interpretation
evaluation
society
community
evidence

Keywords

  • Public participation
  • dilemmas
  • evaluation
  • impact
  • public engagement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Dilemmas of public participation in science policy. / Rowe, Gene; Watermeyer, Richard.

In: Policy Studies, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2018, p. 204-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1285a0ce9b1a47e19f77e762356e3ce3,
title = "Dilemmas of public participation in science policy",
abstract = "Public participation is ubiquitous in many contemporary democratic societies – used for many purposes, and in many contexts, with particular and growing relevance for policy-making on science and technology issues. However, there is a dearth of evidence as to its qualities and benefits. We contend that the implementation and interpretation of participation faces a number of dilemmas that – together –undermine its successful adoption. In this paper, we identify and discuss six specific dilemmas that – together – may militate against the practice and development of good quality participation in science and technology policy, notably dilemmas of Timing; of Relevance; of Representation; of Evaluation; of Criticism; and of Impact. We theoretically account for these dilemmas and discuss their likely impacts. Finally, we provide some suggestions as to how the participation community might attempt to pre-empt difficulties due to these dilemmas and demonstrate participation effectiveness.",
keywords = "Public participation, dilemmas, evaluation, impact, public engagement",
author = "Gene Rowe and Richard Watermeyer",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/01442872.2018.1451502",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "204--221",
journal = "Policy Studies",
issn = "0144-2872",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dilemmas of public participation in science policy

AU - Rowe, Gene

AU - Watermeyer, Richard

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Public participation is ubiquitous in many contemporary democratic societies – used for many purposes, and in many contexts, with particular and growing relevance for policy-making on science and technology issues. However, there is a dearth of evidence as to its qualities and benefits. We contend that the implementation and interpretation of participation faces a number of dilemmas that – together –undermine its successful adoption. In this paper, we identify and discuss six specific dilemmas that – together – may militate against the practice and development of good quality participation in science and technology policy, notably dilemmas of Timing; of Relevance; of Representation; of Evaluation; of Criticism; and of Impact. We theoretically account for these dilemmas and discuss their likely impacts. Finally, we provide some suggestions as to how the participation community might attempt to pre-empt difficulties due to these dilemmas and demonstrate participation effectiveness.

AB - Public participation is ubiquitous in many contemporary democratic societies – used for many purposes, and in many contexts, with particular and growing relevance for policy-making on science and technology issues. However, there is a dearth of evidence as to its qualities and benefits. We contend that the implementation and interpretation of participation faces a number of dilemmas that – together –undermine its successful adoption. In this paper, we identify and discuss six specific dilemmas that – together – may militate against the practice and development of good quality participation in science and technology policy, notably dilemmas of Timing; of Relevance; of Representation; of Evaluation; of Criticism; and of Impact. We theoretically account for these dilemmas and discuss their likely impacts. Finally, we provide some suggestions as to how the participation community might attempt to pre-empt difficulties due to these dilemmas and demonstrate participation effectiveness.

KW - Public participation

KW - dilemmas

KW - evaluation

KW - impact

KW - public engagement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045747459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2018.1451502

DO - 10.1080/01442872.2018.1451502

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 204

EP - 221

JO - Policy Studies

JF - Policy Studies

SN - 0144-2872

IS - 2

ER -