Dietary approaches to weight-loss, Health At Every Size® and beyond

rethinking the war on obesity

Andrea Bombak, Lee F. Monaghan, Emma Rich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Despite considerable contestation, ‘excess’ weight/fatness is commonly framed as fatal and in need of behavioural interventions. This article reviews literature which places a question mark over or challenges dietary approaches to weight-loss before critically discussing an alternative weight-inclusive intervention, Health At Every Size®, which is filtering into mainstream discourse while also becoming increasingly fractious. After discussing principles, tensions, resonance and controversies, we reflect on the politics of health and the need to reject the all-too-common definition of weight/fatness as a proxy for individuals’ unhealthy lifestyles and personal irresponsibility. In conclusion, we tease out some of the implications of our discussion for social theorizing of health and efforts to rethink the war on obesity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-108
Number of pages20
JournalSocial Theory and Health
Volume17
Issue number1
Early online date19 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Weight Loss
Obesity
Weights and Measures
Health
health
Proxy
Politics
Life Style
politics
discourse
Warfare
literature

Keywords

  • Critique
  • Dieting
  • Fatness
  • Health At Every Size
  • Obesity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Dietary approaches to weight-loss, Health At Every Size® and beyond : rethinking the war on obesity. / Bombak, Andrea; Monaghan, Lee F.; Rich, Emma.

In: Social Theory and Health, Vol. 17, No. 1, 01.03.2019, p. 89-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{62dece52b34b416e9b4e1c8f0a4c7bc2,
title = "Dietary approaches to weight-loss, Health At Every Size{\circledR} and beyond: rethinking the war on obesity",
abstract = "Despite considerable contestation, ‘excess’ weight/fatness is commonly framed as fatal and in need of behavioural interventions. This article reviews literature which places a question mark over or challenges dietary approaches to weight-loss before critically discussing an alternative weight-inclusive intervention, Health At Every Size{\circledR}, which is filtering into mainstream discourse while also becoming increasingly fractious. After discussing principles, tensions, resonance and controversies, we reflect on the politics of health and the need to reject the all-too-common definition of weight/fatness as a proxy for individuals’ unhealthy lifestyles and personal irresponsibility. In conclusion, we tease out some of the implications of our discussion for social theorizing of health and efforts to rethink the war on obesity.",
keywords = "Critique, Dieting, Fatness, Health At Every Size, Obesity",
author = "Andrea Bombak and Monaghan, {Lee F.} and Emma Rich",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/s41285-018-0070-9",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "89--108",
journal = "Social Theory & Health",
issn = "1477-8211",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dietary approaches to weight-loss, Health At Every Size® and beyond

T2 - rethinking the war on obesity

AU - Bombak, Andrea

AU - Monaghan, Lee F.

AU - Rich, Emma

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Despite considerable contestation, ‘excess’ weight/fatness is commonly framed as fatal and in need of behavioural interventions. This article reviews literature which places a question mark over or challenges dietary approaches to weight-loss before critically discussing an alternative weight-inclusive intervention, Health At Every Size®, which is filtering into mainstream discourse while also becoming increasingly fractious. After discussing principles, tensions, resonance and controversies, we reflect on the politics of health and the need to reject the all-too-common definition of weight/fatness as a proxy for individuals’ unhealthy lifestyles and personal irresponsibility. In conclusion, we tease out some of the implications of our discussion for social theorizing of health and efforts to rethink the war on obesity.

AB - Despite considerable contestation, ‘excess’ weight/fatness is commonly framed as fatal and in need of behavioural interventions. This article reviews literature which places a question mark over or challenges dietary approaches to weight-loss before critically discussing an alternative weight-inclusive intervention, Health At Every Size®, which is filtering into mainstream discourse while also becoming increasingly fractious. After discussing principles, tensions, resonance and controversies, we reflect on the politics of health and the need to reject the all-too-common definition of weight/fatness as a proxy for individuals’ unhealthy lifestyles and personal irresponsibility. In conclusion, we tease out some of the implications of our discussion for social theorizing of health and efforts to rethink the war on obesity.

KW - Critique

KW - Dieting

KW - Fatness

KW - Health At Every Size

KW - Obesity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048710955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/s41285-018-0070-9

DO - 10.1057/s41285-018-0070-9

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 89

EP - 108

JO - Social Theory & Health

JF - Social Theory & Health

SN - 1477-8211

IS - 1

ER -