Developments in phased retirement

Robert Hutchens, Kerry L Papps

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter explores why employers might permit phased retirement only after employees officially retire. This issue is addressed based on interviews with close to 1,000 establishments regarding their phased retirement policies. Employers were asked whether they would permit an older worker to reduce hours, and, if so, whether they favoured reduction in hours before or after official retirement. Results show that many employers do not indicate a strong preference; rather, they seem open to informally arranged reductions in hours, both before and after official retirement. Statistical methods were used to analyze what types of employers might permit hour reductions to occur before and/or after official retirement. The findings suggest that the preference for retire/rehire is at the individual rather than the establishment level, often due to pension and other benefit plan inducements. Government policy could enhance work/retirement flexibility by clarifying the meaning of what constitutes retirement under tax and labour law.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationReinventing the Retirement Paradigm
EditorsRobert L Clark, Olivia S Mitchell
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages133-159
Number of pages27
ISBN (Print)0-19-928460-1
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Retirement
Employers
Older workers
Labour law
Pensions
Tax
Retirement policies
Government policy
Statistical methods
Employees
Inducement

Cite this

Hutchens, R., & Papps, K. L. (2005). Developments in phased retirement. In R. L. Clark, & O. S. Mitchell (Eds.), Reinventing the Retirement Paradigm (pp. 133-159). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199284601.001.0001

Developments in phased retirement. / Hutchens, Robert; Papps, Kerry L.

Reinventing the Retirement Paradigm. ed. / Robert L Clark; Olivia S Mitchell. Oxford University Press, 2005. p. 133-159.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Hutchens, R & Papps, KL 2005, Developments in phased retirement. in RL Clark & OS Mitchell (eds), Reinventing the Retirement Paradigm. Oxford University Press, pp. 133-159. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199284601.001.0001
Hutchens R, Papps KL. Developments in phased retirement. In Clark RL, Mitchell OS, editors, Reinventing the Retirement Paradigm. Oxford University Press. 2005. p. 133-159 https://doi.org/10.1093/0199284601.001.0001
Hutchens, Robert ; Papps, Kerry L. / Developments in phased retirement. Reinventing the Retirement Paradigm. editor / Robert L Clark ; Olivia S Mitchell. Oxford University Press, 2005. pp. 133-159
@inbook{8fd2e2b6d6734f5d8c2ca68d73bf5154,
title = "Developments in phased retirement",
abstract = "This chapter explores why employers might permit phased retirement only after employees officially retire. This issue is addressed based on interviews with close to 1,000 establishments regarding their phased retirement policies. Employers were asked whether they would permit an older worker to reduce hours, and, if so, whether they favoured reduction in hours before or after official retirement. Results show that many employers do not indicate a strong preference; rather, they seem open to informally arranged reductions in hours, both before and after official retirement. Statistical methods were used to analyze what types of employers might permit hour reductions to occur before and/or after official retirement. The findings suggest that the preference for retire/rehire is at the individual rather than the establishment level, often due to pension and other benefit plan inducements. Government policy could enhance work/retirement flexibility by clarifying the meaning of what constitutes retirement under tax and labour law.",
author = "Robert Hutchens and Papps, {Kerry L}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1093/0199284601.001.0001",
language = "English",
isbn = "0-19-928460-1",
pages = "133--159",
editor = "Clark, {Robert L} and Mitchell, {Olivia S}",
booktitle = "Reinventing the Retirement Paradigm",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "UK United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Developments in phased retirement

AU - Hutchens, Robert

AU - Papps, Kerry L

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This chapter explores why employers might permit phased retirement only after employees officially retire. This issue is addressed based on interviews with close to 1,000 establishments regarding their phased retirement policies. Employers were asked whether they would permit an older worker to reduce hours, and, if so, whether they favoured reduction in hours before or after official retirement. Results show that many employers do not indicate a strong preference; rather, they seem open to informally arranged reductions in hours, both before and after official retirement. Statistical methods were used to analyze what types of employers might permit hour reductions to occur before and/or after official retirement. The findings suggest that the preference for retire/rehire is at the individual rather than the establishment level, often due to pension and other benefit plan inducements. Government policy could enhance work/retirement flexibility by clarifying the meaning of what constitutes retirement under tax and labour law.

AB - This chapter explores why employers might permit phased retirement only after employees officially retire. This issue is addressed based on interviews with close to 1,000 establishments regarding their phased retirement policies. Employers were asked whether they would permit an older worker to reduce hours, and, if so, whether they favoured reduction in hours before or after official retirement. Results show that many employers do not indicate a strong preference; rather, they seem open to informally arranged reductions in hours, both before and after official retirement. Statistical methods were used to analyze what types of employers might permit hour reductions to occur before and/or after official retirement. The findings suggest that the preference for retire/rehire is at the individual rather than the establishment level, often due to pension and other benefit plan inducements. Government policy could enhance work/retirement flexibility by clarifying the meaning of what constitutes retirement under tax and labour law.

U2 - 10.1093/0199284601.001.0001

DO - 10.1093/0199284601.001.0001

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0-19-928460-1

SP - 133

EP - 159

BT - Reinventing the Retirement Paradigm

A2 - Clark, Robert L

A2 - Mitchell, Olivia S

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -