Development and the limits of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

The paper analyzes the contribution of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice for development studies. The influence of Sen’s book for thinking about development is likely to parallel that of John Rawls’s Theory of Justice in political theory. This paper argues that The Idea of Justice has a limited reach in relation to addressing concrete cases of injustice because it is built only on the dual foundations of freedom and reasoning. On the basis of real world examples of unjust situations derived from Sen’s body of writings itself, the paper discusses the limits of The Idea of Justice. It contends that remedying injustice requires an understanding of how justice is structural and which recognizes that discussion of justice is inseparable from reasoning about the nature of the good society. The paper concludes by pointing out The Idea of Justice’s ambiguous relationship with liberalism.
LanguageEnglish
Place of PublicationBath, U. K.
PublisherBath Papers in International Development. Centre for Development Studies, University of Bath
StatusPublished - Aug 2010

Fingerprint

justice
political theory
liberalism

Keywords

  • Amartya Sen
  • reasoning
  • freedom
  • structural injustice
  • Justice
  • liberalism

Cite this

Deneulin, S. (2010). Development and the limits of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice. Bath, U. K.: Bath Papers in International Development. Centre for Development Studies, University of Bath.

Development and the limits of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice. / Deneulin, Severine.

Bath, U. K. : Bath Papers in International Development. Centre for Development Studies, University of Bath, 2010.

Research output: Working paper

Deneulin, S 2010 'Development and the limits of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice' Bath Papers in International Development. Centre for Development Studies, University of Bath, Bath, U. K.
Deneulin S. Development and the limits of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice. Bath, U. K.: Bath Papers in International Development. Centre for Development Studies, University of Bath. 2010 Aug.
Deneulin, Severine. / Development and the limits of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice. Bath, U. K. : Bath Papers in International Development. Centre for Development Studies, University of Bath, 2010.
@techreport{18af54c3540649e09112f386780489f3,
title = "Development and the limits of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice",
abstract = "The paper analyzes the contribution of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice for development studies. The influence of Sen’s book for thinking about development is likely to parallel that of John Rawls’s Theory of Justice in political theory. This paper argues that The Idea of Justice has a limited reach in relation to addressing concrete cases of injustice because it is built only on the dual foundations of freedom and reasoning. On the basis of real world examples of unjust situations derived from Sen’s body of writings itself, the paper discusses the limits of The Idea of Justice. It contends that remedying injustice requires an understanding of how justice is structural and which recognizes that discussion of justice is inseparable from reasoning about the nature of the good society. The paper concludes by pointing out The Idea of Justice’s ambiguous relationship with liberalism.",
keywords = "Amartya Sen, reasoning, freedom, structural injustice, Justice, liberalism",
author = "Severine Deneulin",
note = "ID number: Working Paper no. 9",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
language = "English",
publisher = "Bath Papers in International Development. Centre for Development Studies, University of Bath",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Bath Papers in International Development. Centre for Development Studies, University of Bath",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - Development and the limits of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice

AU - Deneulin, Severine

N1 - ID number: Working Paper no. 9

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - The paper analyzes the contribution of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice for development studies. The influence of Sen’s book for thinking about development is likely to parallel that of John Rawls’s Theory of Justice in political theory. This paper argues that The Idea of Justice has a limited reach in relation to addressing concrete cases of injustice because it is built only on the dual foundations of freedom and reasoning. On the basis of real world examples of unjust situations derived from Sen’s body of writings itself, the paper discusses the limits of The Idea of Justice. It contends that remedying injustice requires an understanding of how justice is structural and which recognizes that discussion of justice is inseparable from reasoning about the nature of the good society. The paper concludes by pointing out The Idea of Justice’s ambiguous relationship with liberalism.

AB - The paper analyzes the contribution of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice for development studies. The influence of Sen’s book for thinking about development is likely to parallel that of John Rawls’s Theory of Justice in political theory. This paper argues that The Idea of Justice has a limited reach in relation to addressing concrete cases of injustice because it is built only on the dual foundations of freedom and reasoning. On the basis of real world examples of unjust situations derived from Sen’s body of writings itself, the paper discusses the limits of The Idea of Justice. It contends that remedying injustice requires an understanding of how justice is structural and which recognizes that discussion of justice is inseparable from reasoning about the nature of the good society. The paper concludes by pointing out The Idea of Justice’s ambiguous relationship with liberalism.

KW - Amartya Sen

KW - reasoning

KW - freedom

KW - structural injustice

KW - Justice

KW - liberalism

UR - http://www.bath.ac.uk/cds/

M3 - Working paper

BT - Development and the limits of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice

PB - Bath Papers in International Development. Centre for Development Studies, University of Bath

CY - Bath, U. K.

ER -