Development and the limits of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 8 Citations

Abstract

The paper analyzes the contribution of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice for development studies. The influence of Sen’s book for thinking about development is likely to parallel that of John Rawls’s Theory of Justice in political theory. This paper argues that The Idea of Justice has a limited reach in relation to addressing concrete cases of injustice because it is built only on the dual foundations of freedom and reasoning. On the basis of real world examples of unjust situations derived from Sen’s body of writings itself, the paper discusses the limits of The Idea of Justice. It contends that remedying injustice requires an understanding of how justice is structural and which recognizes that discussion of justice is inseparable from reasoning about the nature of the good society. The paper concludes by pointing out The Idea of Justice’s ambiguous relationship with liberalism.
LanguageEnglish
Pages787-797
Number of pages11
JournalThird World Quarterly
Volume32
Issue number4
Early online date25 May 2011
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

justice
political theory
liberalism

Keywords

  • Amartya Sen
  • reasoning
  • freedom
  • structural injustice
  • Justice
  • liberalism

Cite this

Development and the limits of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice. / Deneulin, Severine.

In: Third World Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2011, p. 787-797.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e3f7be798baf46499550193787c880e1,
title = "Development and the limits of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice",
abstract = "The paper analyzes the contribution of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice for development studies. The influence of Sen’s book for thinking about development is likely to parallel that of John Rawls’s Theory of Justice in political theory. This paper argues that The Idea of Justice has a limited reach in relation to addressing concrete cases of injustice because it is built only on the dual foundations of freedom and reasoning. On the basis of real world examples of unjust situations derived from Sen’s body of writings itself, the paper discusses the limits of The Idea of Justice. It contends that remedying injustice requires an understanding of how justice is structural and which recognizes that discussion of justice is inseparable from reasoning about the nature of the good society. The paper concludes by pointing out The Idea of Justice’s ambiguous relationship with liberalism.",
keywords = "Amartya Sen, reasoning, freedom, structural injustice, Justice, liberalism",
author = "Severine Deneulin",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1080/01436597.2011.567008",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "787--797",
journal = "Third World Quarterly",
issn = "0143-6597",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and the limits of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice

AU - Deneulin,Severine

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The paper analyzes the contribution of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice for development studies. The influence of Sen’s book for thinking about development is likely to parallel that of John Rawls’s Theory of Justice in political theory. This paper argues that The Idea of Justice has a limited reach in relation to addressing concrete cases of injustice because it is built only on the dual foundations of freedom and reasoning. On the basis of real world examples of unjust situations derived from Sen’s body of writings itself, the paper discusses the limits of The Idea of Justice. It contends that remedying injustice requires an understanding of how justice is structural and which recognizes that discussion of justice is inseparable from reasoning about the nature of the good society. The paper concludes by pointing out The Idea of Justice’s ambiguous relationship with liberalism.

AB - The paper analyzes the contribution of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice for development studies. The influence of Sen’s book for thinking about development is likely to parallel that of John Rawls’s Theory of Justice in political theory. This paper argues that The Idea of Justice has a limited reach in relation to addressing concrete cases of injustice because it is built only on the dual foundations of freedom and reasoning. On the basis of real world examples of unjust situations derived from Sen’s body of writings itself, the paper discusses the limits of The Idea of Justice. It contends that remedying injustice requires an understanding of how justice is structural and which recognizes that discussion of justice is inseparable from reasoning about the nature of the good society. The paper concludes by pointing out The Idea of Justice’s ambiguous relationship with liberalism.

KW - Amartya Sen

KW - reasoning

KW - freedom

KW - structural injustice

KW - Justice

KW - liberalism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958019485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.567008

U2 - 10.1080/01436597.2011.567008

DO - 10.1080/01436597.2011.567008

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 787

EP - 797

JO - Third World Quarterly

T2 - Third World Quarterly

JF - Third World Quarterly

SN - 0143-6597

IS - 4

ER -