Development and preliminary validation of the food intolerance Quality of Life Questionnaire (FIQLQ): Adult Form

Audrey DunnGalvin, Julie Barnett, Fiona M. Begen, Kathleen Ryan, Jane S. Lucas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Approximately 20% of children and adults avoid certain foods because of perceived food intolerance. Valid and reliable health-related quality of life instruments are needed to measure changes following clinical, therapeutic or policy interventions. However, there are no disease-specific quality of life instruments for adults with food intolerances. Objective: To develop the Food Intolerance Quality of Life Questionnaire FIQLQ. Then to conduct psychometric validation including reliability and construct validity. Methods: We adapted the existing Food Allergy Quality of Life questionnaire (FAQLQ) for interviews with 14 adults with food intolerance. For preliminary psychometric validation, 229 adults with food intolerances completed the online electronic version of FIQLQ. Results: The resultant FIQLQ had 18 items which loaded onto 3 subscales—Emotional Impact, Social and Dietary Restrictions, Reactions and Avoidance. Each subscale had excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α 0.81–0.94). Content, convergent and construct validity was supported by significant correlations of FIQLQ subscale scores with hypothesised variables including age, numbers of symptoms and level of stress experienced due to intolerance. Conclusion: The FIQLQ has good reliability, construct validity and internal consistency. It is short and easy to use, providing a good tool for evaluating quality of life in the clinical research setting and to inform health and regulatory policies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1109-1116
Number of pages8
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume27
Issue number4
Early online date18 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Food Quality
Quality of Life
Food
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
Food Hypersensitivity
Health Policy
Interviews

Keywords

  • Consumer
  • Food intolerance
  • Food venues
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Measurement
  • Outcomes
  • Patient
  • Regulation
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Development and preliminary validation of the food intolerance Quality of Life Questionnaire (FIQLQ) : Adult Form. / DunnGalvin, Audrey; Barnett, Julie; Begen, Fiona M.; Ryan, Kathleen; Lucas, Jane S.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 27, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 1109-1116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DunnGalvin, Audrey ; Barnett, Julie ; Begen, Fiona M. ; Ryan, Kathleen ; Lucas, Jane S. / Development and preliminary validation of the food intolerance Quality of Life Questionnaire (FIQLQ) : Adult Form. In: Quality of Life Research. 2018 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 1109-1116.
@article{f4de8c6fea604a409b086b797de40c4e,
title = "Development and preliminary validation of the food intolerance Quality of Life Questionnaire (FIQLQ): Adult Form",
abstract = "Background: Approximately 20{\%} of children and adults avoid certain foods because of perceived food intolerance. Valid and reliable health-related quality of life instruments are needed to measure changes following clinical, therapeutic or policy interventions. However, there are no disease-specific quality of life instruments for adults with food intolerances. Objective: To develop the Food Intolerance Quality of Life Questionnaire FIQLQ. Then to conduct psychometric validation including reliability and construct validity. Methods: We adapted the existing Food Allergy Quality of Life questionnaire (FAQLQ) for interviews with 14 adults with food intolerance. For preliminary psychometric validation, 229 adults with food intolerances completed the online electronic version of FIQLQ. Results: The resultant FIQLQ had 18 items which loaded onto 3 subscales—Emotional Impact, Social and Dietary Restrictions, Reactions and Avoidance. Each subscale had excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α 0.81–0.94). Content, convergent and construct validity was supported by significant correlations of FIQLQ subscale scores with hypothesised variables including age, numbers of symptoms and level of stress experienced due to intolerance. Conclusion: The FIQLQ has good reliability, construct validity and internal consistency. It is short and easy to use, providing a good tool for evaluating quality of life in the clinical research setting and to inform health and regulatory policies.",
keywords = "Consumer, Food intolerance, Food venues, Health-related quality of life, Measurement, Outcomes, Patient, Regulation, Validation",
author = "Audrey DunnGalvin and Julie Barnett and Begen, {Fiona M.} and Kathleen Ryan and Lucas, {Jane S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-017-1732-0",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1109--1116",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and preliminary validation of the food intolerance Quality of Life Questionnaire (FIQLQ)

T2 - Adult Form

AU - DunnGalvin, Audrey

AU - Barnett, Julie

AU - Begen, Fiona M.

AU - Ryan, Kathleen

AU - Lucas, Jane S.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Background: Approximately 20% of children and adults avoid certain foods because of perceived food intolerance. Valid and reliable health-related quality of life instruments are needed to measure changes following clinical, therapeutic or policy interventions. However, there are no disease-specific quality of life instruments for adults with food intolerances. Objective: To develop the Food Intolerance Quality of Life Questionnaire FIQLQ. Then to conduct psychometric validation including reliability and construct validity. Methods: We adapted the existing Food Allergy Quality of Life questionnaire (FAQLQ) for interviews with 14 adults with food intolerance. For preliminary psychometric validation, 229 adults with food intolerances completed the online electronic version of FIQLQ. Results: The resultant FIQLQ had 18 items which loaded onto 3 subscales—Emotional Impact, Social and Dietary Restrictions, Reactions and Avoidance. Each subscale had excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α 0.81–0.94). Content, convergent and construct validity was supported by significant correlations of FIQLQ subscale scores with hypothesised variables including age, numbers of symptoms and level of stress experienced due to intolerance. Conclusion: The FIQLQ has good reliability, construct validity and internal consistency. It is short and easy to use, providing a good tool for evaluating quality of life in the clinical research setting and to inform health and regulatory policies.

AB - Background: Approximately 20% of children and adults avoid certain foods because of perceived food intolerance. Valid and reliable health-related quality of life instruments are needed to measure changes following clinical, therapeutic or policy interventions. However, there are no disease-specific quality of life instruments for adults with food intolerances. Objective: To develop the Food Intolerance Quality of Life Questionnaire FIQLQ. Then to conduct psychometric validation including reliability and construct validity. Methods: We adapted the existing Food Allergy Quality of Life questionnaire (FAQLQ) for interviews with 14 adults with food intolerance. For preliminary psychometric validation, 229 adults with food intolerances completed the online electronic version of FIQLQ. Results: The resultant FIQLQ had 18 items which loaded onto 3 subscales—Emotional Impact, Social and Dietary Restrictions, Reactions and Avoidance. Each subscale had excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α 0.81–0.94). Content, convergent and construct validity was supported by significant correlations of FIQLQ subscale scores with hypothesised variables including age, numbers of symptoms and level of stress experienced due to intolerance. Conclusion: The FIQLQ has good reliability, construct validity and internal consistency. It is short and easy to use, providing a good tool for evaluating quality of life in the clinical research setting and to inform health and regulatory policies.

KW - Consumer

KW - Food intolerance

KW - Food venues

KW - Health-related quality of life

KW - Measurement

KW - Outcomes

KW - Patient

KW - Regulation

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034241888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-017-1732-0

DO - 10.1007/s11136-017-1732-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85034241888

VL - 27

SP - 1109

EP - 1116

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 4

ER -