Determinants of PhD student satisfaction:

The roles of supervisor, department, and peer qualities

Gerard H Dericks, Edmund R Thompson, Margaret Roberts, Florence T T Phua

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding the determinants of PhD student satisfaction is likely to become increasingly vital for universities as student satisfaction rankings already ubiquitous at undergraduate and master degree levels extend more broadly to the PhD level. Moreover, as PhD student populations and university competition become increasingly transnational, there is a growing need to understand cross-nationally common determinants of satisfaction. Building on prior research into PhD student satisfaction, and drawing upon relevant conceptual and metrical refinements in the measurement of satisfaction from cognate domains of psychology, we use cross-sectional data (N=409) from PhD candidates across the sciences, social sciences, and humanities in 63 universities from 20 countries to examine how overall PhD student satisfaction is determined by, respectively and in combination, supervisor, department, and peer-group, in terms of both their academic qualities and supportiveness. Taken together, we find that supervisor supportiveness is the greatest predictor of PhD student satisfaction, but that supervisor academic qualities have no significant effect. However, both the academic qualities and supportiveness of departments significantly predict PhD student satisfaction, suggesting university departments and PhD supervisors would ideally work jointly, and perhaps more closely than many currently do, to achieve competitive levels of PhD student satisfaction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1053-1068
Number of pages17
JournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume44
Issue number7
Early online date3 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Oct 2019

Keywords

  • PhD-doctoral student satisfaction
  • academic qualities
  • department
  • peers
  • supervisor
  • supportiveness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Determinants of PhD student satisfaction: The roles of supervisor, department, and peer qualities. / Dericks, Gerard H; Thompson, Edmund R; Roberts, Margaret; Phua, Florence T T.

In: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 44, No. 7, 03.10.2019, p. 1053-1068.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e6d92195fd704e3ba8b0e68b80569766,
title = "Determinants of PhD student satisfaction:: The roles of supervisor, department, and peer qualities",
abstract = "Understanding the determinants of PhD student satisfaction is likely to become increasingly vital for universities as student satisfaction rankings already ubiquitous at undergraduate and master degree levels extend more broadly to the PhD level. Moreover, as PhD student populations and university competition become increasingly transnational, there is a growing need to understand cross-nationally common determinants of satisfaction. Building on prior research into PhD student satisfaction, and drawing upon relevant conceptual and metrical refinements in the measurement of satisfaction from cognate domains of psychology, we use cross-sectional data (N=409) from PhD candidates across the sciences, social sciences, and humanities in 63 universities from 20 countries to examine how overall PhD student satisfaction is determined by, respectively and in combination, supervisor, department, and peer-group, in terms of both their academic qualities and supportiveness. Taken together, we find that supervisor supportiveness is the greatest predictor of PhD student satisfaction, but that supervisor academic qualities have no significant effect. However, both the academic qualities and supportiveness of departments significantly predict PhD student satisfaction, suggesting university departments and PhD supervisors would ideally work jointly, and perhaps more closely than many currently do, to achieve competitive levels of PhD student satisfaction.",
keywords = "PhD-doctoral student satisfaction, academic qualities, department, peers, supervisor, supportiveness",
author = "Dericks, {Gerard H} and Thompson, {Edmund R} and Margaret Roberts and Phua, {Florence T T}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/02602938.2019.1570484",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1053--1068",
journal = "Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education",
issn = "1469-297X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinants of PhD student satisfaction:

T2 - The roles of supervisor, department, and peer qualities

AU - Dericks, Gerard H

AU - Thompson, Edmund R

AU - Roberts, Margaret

AU - Phua, Florence T T

PY - 2019/10/3

Y1 - 2019/10/3

N2 - Understanding the determinants of PhD student satisfaction is likely to become increasingly vital for universities as student satisfaction rankings already ubiquitous at undergraduate and master degree levels extend more broadly to the PhD level. Moreover, as PhD student populations and university competition become increasingly transnational, there is a growing need to understand cross-nationally common determinants of satisfaction. Building on prior research into PhD student satisfaction, and drawing upon relevant conceptual and metrical refinements in the measurement of satisfaction from cognate domains of psychology, we use cross-sectional data (N=409) from PhD candidates across the sciences, social sciences, and humanities in 63 universities from 20 countries to examine how overall PhD student satisfaction is determined by, respectively and in combination, supervisor, department, and peer-group, in terms of both their academic qualities and supportiveness. Taken together, we find that supervisor supportiveness is the greatest predictor of PhD student satisfaction, but that supervisor academic qualities have no significant effect. However, both the academic qualities and supportiveness of departments significantly predict PhD student satisfaction, suggesting university departments and PhD supervisors would ideally work jointly, and perhaps more closely than many currently do, to achieve competitive levels of PhD student satisfaction.

AB - Understanding the determinants of PhD student satisfaction is likely to become increasingly vital for universities as student satisfaction rankings already ubiquitous at undergraduate and master degree levels extend more broadly to the PhD level. Moreover, as PhD student populations and university competition become increasingly transnational, there is a growing need to understand cross-nationally common determinants of satisfaction. Building on prior research into PhD student satisfaction, and drawing upon relevant conceptual and metrical refinements in the measurement of satisfaction from cognate domains of psychology, we use cross-sectional data (N=409) from PhD candidates across the sciences, social sciences, and humanities in 63 universities from 20 countries to examine how overall PhD student satisfaction is determined by, respectively and in combination, supervisor, department, and peer-group, in terms of both their academic qualities and supportiveness. Taken together, we find that supervisor supportiveness is the greatest predictor of PhD student satisfaction, but that supervisor academic qualities have no significant effect. However, both the academic qualities and supportiveness of departments significantly predict PhD student satisfaction, suggesting university departments and PhD supervisors would ideally work jointly, and perhaps more closely than many currently do, to achieve competitive levels of PhD student satisfaction.

KW - PhD-doctoral student satisfaction

KW - academic qualities

KW - department

KW - peers

KW - supervisor

KW - supportiveness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063900479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02602938.2019.1570484

DO - 10.1080/02602938.2019.1570484

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 1053

EP - 1068

JO - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

JF - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

SN - 1469-297X

IS - 7

ER -