Abstract
In response to the plastic waste crisis, teabag producers have substituted the petrochemical-plastic content of their products with bio-based, biodegradable polymers such as polylactic acid (PLA). Despite widespread use, the degradation rate of PLA/PLA-blended materials in natural soil and their effects on soil biota are poorly understood. This study examined the percentage mass deterioration of teabags with differing cellulose:PLA compositions following burial (−10 cm depth) in an arable field margin for 7-months, using a suite of analytical techniques, such as size exclusion chromatography, 1H nuclear magnetic resonance, dynamic scanning calorimetry, and scanning electron microscopy. The effect of 28-d exposure to teabag discs at environmentally relevant concentrations (0.02 %, 0.04 % and 0.07 % w/w) on the survival, growth and reproduction (OECD TG 222 protocol) of the key soil detritivore Eisenia fetida was assessed in laboratory trials. After 7-month burial, Tbag-A (2.4:1 blend) and Tbag-B (3.5:1 cellulose:PLA blend) lost 66 ± 5 % and 78 ± 4 % of their total mass, primarily attributed to degradation of cellulose as identified by FTIR spectroscopy and a reduction in the cellulose:PLA mass ratio, while Tbag-C (PLA) remained unchanged. There were clear treatment and dose-specific effects on the growth and reproductive output of E. fetida. At 0.07 % w/w of Tbag-A adult mortality marginally increased (15 %) and both the quantity of egg cocoons and the average mass of juveniles also increased, while at concentrations ≥0.04 % w/w of Tbag-C, the quantity of cocoons was suppressed. Adverse effects are comparable to those reported for non-biodegradable petrochemical-based plastic, demonstrating that bio-based PLA does not offer a more ‘environmentally friendly’ alternative. Our study emphasises the necessity to better understand the environmental fate and ecotoxicity of PLA/PLA-blends to ensure interventions developed through the UN Plastic Pollution Treaty to use alternatives and substitutes to conventional plastics do not result in unintended negative consequences.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 172806 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Science of the Total Environment |
Volume | 934 |
Early online date | 20 May 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 15 Jul 2024 |
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.Funding
Thanks are extended to Martin Howlett of Deer Park Farm for use of his land, and to Dr. Andy Atfield for laboratory and animal husbandry support. This research is part of the BIO-PLASTIC-RISK project, supported by the Natural Environment Research Council through the grants NE/V007556/1 and NE/V007246/1 .
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Natural Environment Research Council | NE/V007556/1, NE/V007246/1 |
Natural Environment Research Council |
Keywords
- Biopolymer
- Compostable plastic
- Ecotoxicology
- Microplastics
- Plastic alternative
- Plastic substitute
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Engineering
- Environmental Chemistry
- Waste Management and Disposal
- Pollution