Design and Technology: Two Cultures or Unitary Concept?

Daniel Davies, John Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this paper a secondary technology educator from Western Australia argues that design and technology have, in reality, little in common; design being rooted in an 'arts' culture whilst technologists are commonly trained as engineers or scientists. This, he contends, creates tensions in the curriculum when we ask children to 'design and make', activities which are seldom integrated in industry. The converse position is argued by a primary design and technology educator from England, who argues that this essentially educational model can be illustrated with industrial examples. In conclusion, both authors agree that there is indeed a strong educational rationale for the integration of designing and making in furthering pupils' technological capability, but that the purposes of technology curricula must be made explicit before introducing the complexity of the profess
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)213-216
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Design & Technology Education
Volume6
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2001

Cite this

Design and Technology: Two Cultures or Unitary Concept? / Davies, Daniel; Williams, John.

In: Journal of Design & Technology Education, Vol. 6, No. 3, 01.11.2001, p. 213-216.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5d0df28283f64496b9d9980135993a0f,
title = "Design and Technology: Two Cultures or Unitary Concept?",
abstract = "In this paper a secondary technology educator from Western Australia argues that design and technology have, in reality, little in common; design being rooted in an 'arts' culture whilst technologists are commonly trained as engineers or scientists. This, he contends, creates tensions in the curriculum when we ask children to 'design and make', activities which are seldom integrated in industry. The converse position is argued by a primary design and technology educator from England, who argues that this essentially educational model can be illustrated with industrial examples. In conclusion, both authors agree that there is indeed a strong educational rationale for the integration of designing and making in furthering pupils' technological capability, but that the purposes of technology curricula must be made explicit before introducing the complexity of the profess",
author = "Daniel Davies and John Williams",
year = "2001",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "213--216",
journal = "Journal of Design & Technology Education",
issn = "1360-1431",
publisher = "Trentham Books Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Design and Technology: Two Cultures or Unitary Concept?

AU - Davies, Daniel

AU - Williams, John

PY - 2001/11/1

Y1 - 2001/11/1

N2 - In this paper a secondary technology educator from Western Australia argues that design and technology have, in reality, little in common; design being rooted in an 'arts' culture whilst technologists are commonly trained as engineers or scientists. This, he contends, creates tensions in the curriculum when we ask children to 'design and make', activities which are seldom integrated in industry. The converse position is argued by a primary design and technology educator from England, who argues that this essentially educational model can be illustrated with industrial examples. In conclusion, both authors agree that there is indeed a strong educational rationale for the integration of designing and making in furthering pupils' technological capability, but that the purposes of technology curricula must be made explicit before introducing the complexity of the profess

AB - In this paper a secondary technology educator from Western Australia argues that design and technology have, in reality, little in common; design being rooted in an 'arts' culture whilst technologists are commonly trained as engineers or scientists. This, he contends, creates tensions in the curriculum when we ask children to 'design and make', activities which are seldom integrated in industry. The converse position is argued by a primary design and technology educator from England, who argues that this essentially educational model can be illustrated with industrial examples. In conclusion, both authors agree that there is indeed a strong educational rationale for the integration of designing and making in furthering pupils' technological capability, but that the purposes of technology curricula must be made explicit before introducing the complexity of the profess

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 213

EP - 216

JO - Journal of Design & Technology Education

JF - Journal of Design & Technology Education

SN - 1360-1431

IS - 3

ER -