Derogating innocent victims: The effects of relative versus absolute character judgments

Rael J. Dawtry, Mitchell J. Callan, Annelie J. Harvey, James M Olson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Drawing on just-world theory and research into the suppression and justification of prejudice, we propose that the use of relative compared to absolute measures of an innocent victim’s character enables observers to derogate the victim without transparently violating social norms or values proscribing derogation. In Study 1, we found that positive feelings expressed toward victims mirrored social norms proscribing negative reactions toward them. In Studies 2a, 2b and 3, innocent victims were evaluated more negatively when ratings were made using relative (i.e., compared to evaluations of the average student or the self) versus absolute scales. In Study 4, this effect of scale type on derogation was stronger for people higher in the motivation to avoid prejudiced reactions to victims. Relative judgments seem to allow individuals to enact their counter-normative motivation to derogate the victim under the cover of ambiguity and ostensibly rationally motivated social comparison processes.
LanguageEnglish
Pages186-199
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume44
Issue number2
Early online date3 Oct 2017
StatusPublished - Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Motivation
Social Values
Emotions
Students
Research
Social Norms

Cite this

Derogating innocent victims: The effects of relative versus absolute character judgments. / Dawtry, Rael J.; Callan, Mitchell J.; Harvey, Annelie J.; Olson, James M.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 44, No. 2, 01.2018, p. 186-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da87f0d832ca4b1da5ef61d2861b4aee,
title = "Derogating innocent victims: The effects of relative versus absolute character judgments",
abstract = "Drawing on just-world theory and research into the suppression and justification of prejudice, we propose that the use of relative compared to absolute measures of an innocent victim’s character enables observers to derogate the victim without transparently violating social norms or values proscribing derogation. In Study 1, we found that positive feelings expressed toward victims mirrored social norms proscribing negative reactions toward them. In Studies 2a, 2b and 3, innocent victims were evaluated more negatively when ratings were made using relative (i.e., compared to evaluations of the average student or the self) versus absolute scales. In Study 4, this effect of scale type on derogation was stronger for people higher in the motivation to avoid prejudiced reactions to victims. Relative judgments seem to allow individuals to enact their counter-normative motivation to derogate the victim under the cover of ambiguity and ostensibly rationally motivated social comparison processes.",
author = "Dawtry, {Rael J.} and Callan, {Mitchell J.} and Harvey, {Annelie J.} and Olson, {James M}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "186--199",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Derogating innocent victims: The effects of relative versus absolute character judgments

AU - Dawtry, Rael J.

AU - Callan, Mitchell J.

AU - Harvey, Annelie J.

AU - Olson, James M

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - Drawing on just-world theory and research into the suppression and justification of prejudice, we propose that the use of relative compared to absolute measures of an innocent victim’s character enables observers to derogate the victim without transparently violating social norms or values proscribing derogation. In Study 1, we found that positive feelings expressed toward victims mirrored social norms proscribing negative reactions toward them. In Studies 2a, 2b and 3, innocent victims were evaluated more negatively when ratings were made using relative (i.e., compared to evaluations of the average student or the self) versus absolute scales. In Study 4, this effect of scale type on derogation was stronger for people higher in the motivation to avoid prejudiced reactions to victims. Relative judgments seem to allow individuals to enact their counter-normative motivation to derogate the victim under the cover of ambiguity and ostensibly rationally motivated social comparison processes.

AB - Drawing on just-world theory and research into the suppression and justification of prejudice, we propose that the use of relative compared to absolute measures of an innocent victim’s character enables observers to derogate the victim without transparently violating social norms or values proscribing derogation. In Study 1, we found that positive feelings expressed toward victims mirrored social norms proscribing negative reactions toward them. In Studies 2a, 2b and 3, innocent victims were evaluated more negatively when ratings were made using relative (i.e., compared to evaluations of the average student or the self) versus absolute scales. In Study 4, this effect of scale type on derogation was stronger for people higher in the motivation to avoid prejudiced reactions to victims. Relative judgments seem to allow individuals to enact their counter-normative motivation to derogate the victim under the cover of ambiguity and ostensibly rationally motivated social comparison processes.

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 186

EP - 199

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

T2 - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 2

ER -