TY - JOUR
T1 - Depression screening using a non-verbal self-association task
T2 - A machine-learning based pilot study
AU - Liu, Yang S.
AU - Song, Yipeng
AU - Lee, Naomi A.
AU - Bennett, Daniel M.
AU - Button, Katherine S.
AU - Greenshaw, Andrew
AU - Cao, Bo
AU - Sui, Jie
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was undertaken, in part, thanks to funding from the Canada Research Chairs program (BC), Alberta Innovates (BC), Mental Health Foundation (BC), MITACS Accelerate program (YL. BC), Simon & Martina Sochatsky Fund for Mental Health (BC), the Alberta Synergies in Alzheimer's and Related Disorders (SynAD) program (YL, BC) and University of Alberta Hospital Foundation (BC). The funding sources had no impact on the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
PY - 2022/8/1
Y1 - 2022/8/1
N2 - Background: Effective screening is important to combat the raising burden of depression and opens a critical time window for early intervention. Clinical use of non-verbal depression screening is nascent, yet a promising and viable candidate to supplement verbal screening. Differential self- and emotion-processing in depression patients were previously reported by non-verbal behavioural assessments, corroborated by neuroimaging findings of distinct neuroanatomical markers. Thus non-verbal validated brain-behaviour based self-emotion-related assessment data reflect physiological differences and may support individual level screening of depression. Methods: In this pilot study (n = 84) we collected two longitudinal sessions of behavioural assessment data in a laboratory setting. Depression was assessed using Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), to explore optimal screening methods with machine-learning, and to establish the validity of adapting a novel behavioural assessment focusing on self and emotions for depression screening. Results: The best machine-learning model achieved high performance in depression screening, 10-Fold cross-validation (CV) Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC) of 0.90 and balanced accuracy of 0.81, using a Gradient Boosting algorithm. Prospective prediction using a model trained with session 1 data to predict session 2 depression status achieved a 10-Fold CV AUC of 0.77 and balanced accuracy of 0.66. We also identified interpretable behavioural signatures for depression patients based on the best model. Conclusion: The study supports the utility of using behavioural data as a viable and cost-effective solution for depression screening, with a potential wide range of applications in clinical settings.
AB - Background: Effective screening is important to combat the raising burden of depression and opens a critical time window for early intervention. Clinical use of non-verbal depression screening is nascent, yet a promising and viable candidate to supplement verbal screening. Differential self- and emotion-processing in depression patients were previously reported by non-verbal behavioural assessments, corroborated by neuroimaging findings of distinct neuroanatomical markers. Thus non-verbal validated brain-behaviour based self-emotion-related assessment data reflect physiological differences and may support individual level screening of depression. Methods: In this pilot study (n = 84) we collected two longitudinal sessions of behavioural assessment data in a laboratory setting. Depression was assessed using Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), to explore optimal screening methods with machine-learning, and to establish the validity of adapting a novel behavioural assessment focusing on self and emotions for depression screening. Results: The best machine-learning model achieved high performance in depression screening, 10-Fold cross-validation (CV) Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC) of 0.90 and balanced accuracy of 0.81, using a Gradient Boosting algorithm. Prospective prediction using a model trained with session 1 data to predict session 2 depression status achieved a 10-Fold CV AUC of 0.77 and balanced accuracy of 0.66. We also identified interpretable behavioural signatures for depression patients based on the best model. Conclusion: The study supports the utility of using behavioural data as a viable and cost-effective solution for depression screening, with a potential wide range of applications in clinical settings.
KW - Depression
KW - Machine-learning
KW - Matching technique
KW - Self
KW - Sensitive objective measurement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129754217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.122
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.122
M3 - Article
C2 - 35472473
AN - SCOPUS:85129754217
SN - 0165-0327
VL - 310
SP - 87
EP - 95
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
ER -