Abstract
The dynamic structural load identification capabilities of the gated recurrent unit, long short-term memory, and convolutional neural networks are examined herein. The examination is on realistic small dataset training conditions and on a comparative view to the physics-based residual Kalman filter (RKF). The dynamic load identification suffers from the uncertainty related to obtaining poor predictions when in civil engineering applications only a low number of tests are performed or are available, or when the structural model is unidentifiable. In considering the methods, first, a simulated structure is investigated under a shaker excitation at the top floor. Second, a building in California is investigated under seismic base excitation, which results in loading for all degrees of freedom. Finally, the International Association for Structural Control-American Society of Civil Engineers (IASC-ASCE) structural health monitoring benchmark problem is examined for impact and instant loading conditions. Importantly, the methods are shown to outperform each other on different loading scenarios, while the RKF is shown to outperform the networks in physically parametrized identifiable cases.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1752-1782 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | Structural Health Monitoring |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 27 Jul 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 May 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2024.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to gratefully acknowledge thereviewers for their constructive comments, Editor T.C. for
the friendly communication, Andrew W. Smyth for the previous insightful discussions on residual-based Kalman filtering,
and the Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data and the
Structural Health Monitoring Task Group for providing the
data.
Funding
The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Keywords
- Dynamic load identification
- Structural health monitoring (SHM)
- Structural dynamics
- System identification
- Inverse problems in engineering
- Deep learning
- Artificial neural networks (ANN)
- Recurrent neural networks (RNN)
- Long short-term memory (LSTM)
- Gated recurrent unit (GRU)
- Convolutional neural networks (CNN)
- 1D CNN
- Physics-informed neural networks
- Data-driven modeling
- Sequence modeling
- Time-series prediction
- Kalman filter
- Residual-based Kalman filter (RKF)
- State-space modeling
- Joint input–state–parameter estimation
- Sensitivity analysis
- Parameter estimation
- Civil engineering structures
- Building structures
- Seismic excitation
- Base excitation
- Hammer impact loading
- Shaker excitation
- Benchmark problems (IASC-ASCE)
- Structural load prediction
- Real-time load estimation
- Small dataset learning
- Limited data scenarios
- Noise robustness
- Uncertainty quantification
- Overfitting prevention
- Identifiability issues
- Sensor placement optimization
- Convergence time
- Computational cost
- Error metrics (e.g., accumulated error)
- Validation and prediction accuracy
- Hybrid physics–data-driven approaches
- Reduced-order modeling
- Extrapolation capability
- Uncertainty propagation
- Optimal hyperparameter tuning
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Engineering(all)
- Computer Science(all)
- Chemical Engineering(all)
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
- Energy(all)
- Mathematics(all)
- Materials Science(all)
- Physics and Astronomy(all)
- Decision Sciences(all)
- Environmental Science(all)